Iftikhar, M

Abstract Background The relationship between office vs ambulatory blood pressure (BP) indices is well-studied in patients with idiopathic hypertension, and based on these data, it is known that average 24-hour ambulatory BP is typically lower than office BP. However, emerging data show that office systolic BP (SBP) underestimates arterial afterload in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA), and minimal increase in stroke volume during low intensity exercise results in exaggerated rise in SBP as compared to those with idiopathic hypertension. We hypothesized that COA patients will have higher ambulatory SBP and a higher prevalence of masked hypertension compared to patients with idiopathic hypertension. Methods Case-control study of 118 COA patients and 118 patients with idiopathic hypertension matched by age, sex, body mass index and office SBP. Results Although both groups had similar office SBP (132±17 mmHg) by design, the COA group had paradoxical increases in 24-hour ambulatory SBP (135±14 vs 126±13, p<0.001) and daytime ambulatory SBP (142±16 vs 130±13, p<0.001), and less nocturnal dipping (−3±5 vs −9±4, p<0.001). The COA group also had a higher prevalence of masked hypertension (36 [31%] vs 14 [12%], p<0.001), and worse arterial function indices. Conclusion These findings underscore the potential limitations of relying on office SBP for screening/monitoring of hypertension in COA and potential pitfalls in extrapolating idiopathic hypertension guidelines recommendations to the treatment of COA. It also provides rationale for further studies to determine if pharmacologic BP interventions guided by ambulatory BP data will improve clinical outcomes in the COA population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Abstract Background Left atrial dysfunction (LAD) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) has been described in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA). However, it is unknown whether LA function and LV diastolic function indices can be used for prognostication in this population. The purpose of this study was to determine whether LAD and LVDD were associated with mortality in adults with COA. We hypothesized that LA and LV diastolic function indices will predict transplant-free survival in COA patients. Methods Retrospective study of COA patients (age ≥18) at Mayo Clinic (2000–2018). LVDD was determined using the 2016 guidelines for LVDD assessment, and LAD was assessed using LA reservoir strain. Results Of 721 patients, LV diastolic function could be determined in 635 (88%), while 86 (12%) were classified as indeterminate diastolic function. Of 635 patients, 414 (65%) had no LVDD, while 146 (23%), 53 (8%), and 22 (4%) had grade I/II/III LVDD respectively. The mean LA reservoir strain was −39±11%, and patients were divided into quartiles: top quartile (reference group), mild LAD, moderate LAD, and severe LAD. Of 635 patients, 49 died and 4 underwent heart transplant. On multivariate analysis, Grade III diastolic dysfunction (but not Grade I and II) was associated with mortality as compared to normal diastolic function. On the other hand, there was an incremental risk of mortality across LA strain quartiles: mild LAD (HR 1.16, 1.04–2.06), moderate LAD (HR 1.75, 1.27–3.58), and severe LAD (HR 3.49, 1.88–7.16). Of the 86 patients with indeterminate diastolic function, LAD was associated with a lower 5-year transplant-free survival as compared to normal LA function (83% vs 91%, p=0.06). Conclusions LAD (but not LVDD) was associated with incremental risk of mortality, and thus can be used for prognostication in all patients including those with indeterminate diastolic function. Although the current study did not identify a consistent relationship between LVDD severity classifications and mortality among COA patients, it does not imply that LVDD is benign. Rather it suggests that the conventional criteria for LVDD severity classifications may not be generalizable to every disease subgroup Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Abstract Background There are limited data about outcomes after repair of native coarctation of aorta (COA) in adulthood. The purpose of this study was to describe the procedural outcomes, hemodynamic improvement, regression of LV hypertrophy and cardiovascular events in adults undergoing repair of native COA. Methods The primary outcomes were procedural complications, re-interventions, and hemodynamic improvement (residual COA gradient <20 mmHg) after COA repair. The secondary outcomes were improvement in the severity of hypertension, regression of left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and incidence of cardiovascular events (atrial fibrillation, heart failure hospitalization, and cardiovascular death) after COA repair. Clinical and imaging indices were assessed pre-intervention, and at 1-year (Y1) and 3-years (Y3) post-intervention. Results A total of 172 patients (age 38 [27–48]) underwent COA repair (surgical 161; transcatheter 11). There were no procedural deaths, and all patients had residual COA gradient <20 mmHg. One patients that received transcatheter stent therapy required re-dilation of stent at 12 months post-intervention. There as a reduction in the prevalence of patients requiring anti-hypertensive therapy from 73% (pre-intervention) to 59% and 64% at Y1 and Y3 respectively. However, 72% and 69% of the patients still had systolic blood pressure >130 mmHg (stage 1 and 2 hypertension) at Y1 and Y3 respectively. As compared to patients without hypertension at Y1, patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension had less robust LVMI regression (% change in LVMI 12±5% vs 9±6% vs 5±3%, p<0.001). Hypertension (HR 1.16, 1.05–1.27) and LVMI regression (HR 0.86, 0.81–0.90) were independently associated with cardiovascular events. Conclusions Persistent hypertension was common after repair of native COA in adults. Hypertension (including stage 1 hypertension) was associated with suboptimal regression of LVMI and cardiovascular events. These results are concerning, and highlight the importance of early COA diagnosis and repair, and optimal medical therapy for hypertension after COA repair. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.