Chen, Weina

Background: Anaplastic large cell lymphomas represent a group of T-cell lymphomas that have long been broadly classified by the presence or absence of ALK fusion proteins (ALK+ or ALK−, respectively). However, recent discovery of extensive additional molecular heterogeneity has both promoted refinement of disease classification and uncovered new opportunities for biomarker-guided targeted therapy. In addition to recognition of a new genetic subtype, ALK− ALCL with DUSP22 rearrangement (R), a new molecular classification has been proposed based on the recent discovery of 2 overarching molecular types of ALCL, defined by the presence (Type I) or absence (Type II) of a gene expression signature highly enriched for JAK-STAT3 activation. BCL2 is a mitochondrial membrane protein that functions to inhibit the actions of pro-apoptotic proteins such as BAX and BAK and can be targeted clinically by BCL2 small molecule inhibitors. BCL2 has been reported to be expressed more frequently in ALK− ALCL than in ALK+ ALCL, but its expression in the context of current molecular findings is unknown. Methods: ALCLs were centrally reviewed and classified by current WHO/ICC criteria. BCL2 was performed using IHC and scored as positive if ≥30% of tumor cells showed staining. DUSP22-R was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a breakapart probe set and a dual-color, dual-fusion (D) probe set for the most common DUSP22 translocation, t(6;7)(p25.3;q32.3). pSTAT3Y705 IHC, which is >90% accurate for Type I/II assignment based on gene expression, was performed and scored based on a previously validated cut-off of ≥30%. Results: We evaluated 217 ALCLs (148M/69F; age: mean, 57 y; range, 5-93 y), including 55 systemic ALK+ ALCLs, 127 systemic ALK− ALCLs, and 35 primary cutaneous (pc) ALCLs. Overall, 86/217 cases were positive for BCL2 (40%). BCL2 was positive in 67/127 ALK− ALCLs (53%) and 15/35 pcALCLs (43%; P=NS), but in only 4/51 ALK+ (7%; P<0.0001). DUSP22-R was present in 90 cases (63 ALK− ALCL and 27 pcALCL). BCL2 was positive in 57/90 cases with DUSP22-R (63%) compared to 29/127 without DUSP22-R (23%; P<0.0001). Among 85 cases with DUSP22-R and informative D-FISH testing, BCL2 was positive in 24/36 cases with t(6;7)(p25.3;q32.3) (67%) and 31/49 cases without t(6;7)(p25.3;q32.3) (63%; P=NS). Among 213 cases with informative pSTAT3Y705 staining, BCL2 was positive in 13/88 pSTAT3+ cases (Type I, 15%) and 70/125 pSTAT3− cases (Type II, 56%; P<0.0001). Conclusions: We identified a complex pattern of BCL2 expression across ALCLs that strongly correlates with a recently introduced molecular classification based on gene expression profiling. While our findings are in keeping with the previously reported low expression in ALK+ ALCL, we found that the higher expression in both systemic ALK− ALCL and pcALCL is particularly associated with DUSP22-R and the absence of pSTAT3Y705 expression (Type II ALCLs). The discovery of 2 overarching types of ALCL associated with the presence or absence JAK-STAT3 pathway activation represents a new conceptual framework for classifying ALCL and understanding its therapeutic vulnerabilities. Of note, previous data demonstrated that Type II ALCLs are enriched for epigenetic alterations and particularly overexpress the histone methyltransferase EZH2. Correlation between BCL2 expression and EZH2 expression also is observed in other lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, where dual targeting with EZH2 and BCL2 inhibitors has been proposed. Thus, our findings provide further rationale for stratifying Type I and Type II ALCLs and identify BCL2 as a differentially expressed oncoprotein that might represent a target for precision therapy approaches.

Background: Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) represent a heterogeneous group of T-cell lymphomas that currently are classified by the presence or absence of ALK tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes (ALK+ or ALK−) and clinical presentation (systemic, cutaneous, or breast implant-associated). Two overarching molecular types of ALCL recently were discovered, defined by the presence (Type I) or absence (Type II) of a gene expression signature highly enriched for JAK-STAT3 activation. Fusions involving non-ALK TK genes occur in some ALK− cases, but the fusion landscape of ALCL remains incompletely characterized. Methods: Expert consensus pathology review was conducted in the Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP). RNAseq was performed and fusions were identified using FusionCatcher. Here, we focused on recurrent in-frame coding fusions. Previously unreported fusions were validated by RT-PCR. Type I/II was assigned using a previously validated gene expression-based model. Genes with adjusted (adj) P<0.05 were considered differentially expressed. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for systemic ALCL, when available. Results: We evaluated 379 ALCLs (229M/150F; mean age, 56 y). Of 199 candidate fusions (excluding reciprocal events), 28 were recurrent and passed quality metrics. At least 1 of these 28 fusions was present in 150 cases (40%). ALK fusions were present in 106 ALK+ ALCLs (all Type I; P<0.0001). Of these, NPM1::ALK was seen in 68/106 (64%). Alternate partners (X::ALK) included ATIC (N=24) and CTLC, COL1A2, MSN, MYH9, RNF213, SATB1, TFH, TPM3, and TRAF1 (1-3 cases each). X::ALK was associated with older age (mean, 52 y) than NPM1::ALK (32 y; P<0.0001) and showed relative overexpression of 49 genes, including multiple activators of small GTPases such as CGNL1 (FC, 5.6; Padj=2.4×10-6), SRGAP1, ALS2, DOCK1, and NCKAP1. ALK expression was similar in cases with NPM1::ALK and X::ALK and there was no significant difference in OS. Non-ALK TK fusions were seen in 17/273 ALK− cases (6%), including TYK2 (N=9); JAK2 (N=6); and ROS1 (N=2). All were Type I ALCLs (P<0.0001). ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions overexpressed 38 genes compared to ALK− cases without TK fusions, including cytokines involved in the IL17 signaling pathway such as CXCL6 (FC, 12.5; Padj=4.2×10-3), CXCL1, and CSF3. We then assessed the relationship between ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions and ALK+ cases by separately comparing each subset to ALK− cases without TK fusions. FC values for ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions were significantly correlated with FC values for ALK+ ALCLs over the set of expressed genes (R=0.54; P<0.0001). At a median follow-up of 32 months, 0/4 systemic ALCL patients with non-ALK TK fusions had died, while 30% of those with ALK− ALCL without TK fusions had died, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.26). The other 13 ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions were either localized ALCLs or did not have outcome data available. Of 20 TP63 fusions, 17 (85%) were TBL1XR1::TP63 and 3 were X::TP63. As previously reported, TP63 fusions were associated with poor OS (median OS, 10 months; not reached for other ALK− ALCLs; P=0.007). Four ALCLs had a novel NCL::UBTF fusion involving genes encoding the nucleolar proteins nucleolin and nucleolar (upstream binding) transcription factor-1. Four cases each had PARG::BMS1 and TNK1::GPS2 (the latter seen only in Type I ALCLs). Conclusions: This large consortium-based analysis of coding fusions further elucidates the molecular distinction between Type I and Type II ALCLs. Both ALK and non-ALK TK fusions were seen exclusively in Type I ALCLs, which we have shown previously are enriched for JAK-STAT3 pathway genes and correlate strongly with pSTAT3Y705 positivity by immunohistochemistry. These fusions were not identified in Type II ALCLs, which previous data suggest are associated with epigenetic alterations. ALK+ ALCLs with NPM1::ALK and X::ALK showed differences in gene expression, suggesting biological differences. Furthermore, ALCLs with non-ALK TK fusions shared gene expression features with ALK+ ALCL. Clinical fusion detection could enhance molecular classification of Type I and Type II ALCLs and may guide precision therapy.

Background: Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) are CD30-positive T-cell lymphomas that share pathologic features but differ in clinical presentation, outcome, and molecular features. The World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) classify ALCLs by presence or absence of ALK rearrangements (R) and clinical presentation (systemic, cutaneous [c], or breast implant-associated [BIA]). ICC, but not WHO, recognizes DUSP22-R as defining a new genetic subtype of ALK- ALCL. The classifications otherwise do not reflect additional molecular heterogeneity in genetics (e.g., TP63-R) or therapeutic vulnerabilities (e.g., JAK-STAT3 pathway activation). Methods: ALCLs (N=689) underwent expert consensus review (WHO/ICC) through the Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP). All cases also underwent genetic subtyping (ALK, DUSP22, TP63, and triple-negative [TN]) using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as IHC for phospho-STAT3 Tyr705 (pSTAT3). RNAseq was performed and evaluable in 393 cases; the remaining cases had insufficient tissue, tumor content, RNA yield or quality, and/or sequencing data quality. Sequenced and non-sequenced sub-cohorts had similar demographics and subtype distribution. Results: Unsupervised gene expression profiling (GEP) identified 2 main molecular types of ALCL. Type I ALCLs predominantly included ALK+ ALCLs, BIA-ALCLs, and a subset of TN ALCLs (designated TN-I), whereas Type II ALCLs predominantly included ALCLs with DUSP22-R, TP63-R, or both (double-hit; DH), and the remaining TN ALCLs (TN-II). Type I ALCLs were strongly associated with pSTAT3 expression (74.2±26.4% positive malignant cells vs 9.9±22.7% for Type II; P<0.0001). An independently derived pSTAT3 staining threshold of 30% assigned Type I vs II with 91% accuracy. A third cluster of ALCLs, mostly cALCL, showed an epithelial GEP signature rather than a lymphoma signature; these cases were assigned to Types I or II based on pSTAT3 IHC. Distinct sub-signatures were identified for ALK+, DUSP22-R, TP63-R, and BIA ALCL (Fig. 1), but not ALK- ALCL or cALCL. Gene set enrichment analysis showed Type I ALCLs to be enriched for JAK-STAT3 signaling genes (normalized enrichment score [NES], 2.22; FDR<0.0001) and related pathways, such as TNFα-NFκB signaling (NES, 2.21; FDR<0.0001). In contrast, Type II ALCLs were enriched for cell cycle, DNA repair, epigenetic, and metabolic pathway genes, but not for major tyrosine kinase-mediated signaling pathway genes. Enriched epigenetic pathways included chromatin modifying enzymes (NES, -1.86; FDR=0.002) and histone methylation (NES, -1.71; FDR=0.002). EZH2 was the most overexpressed gene in Type II ALCLs (fold-change, 7.74; FDR=8.84×10 -306). At the protein level, EZH2 IHC H-scores were 275±45 in Type II and 168±70 in Type I ALCLs (P<0.0001); H3K27me3 H-scores were 170±81 and 76±63, respectively (P<0.001). The top metabolic gene set involved cholesterol biosynthesis (NES, -1.88; FDR=0.002). Overall survival (OS) data were available in 257 systemic ALCL patients (145 sequenced and 112 non-sequenced; cALCL and BIA-ALCL were excluded). Non-sequenced TN ALCLs were assigned to TN-I or TN-II using pSTAT3 IHC. The results supported earlier data indicating favorable prognosis of DUSP22-R ALCL (5 y OS, 95%) and ALK+ ALCL (87%), intermediate prognosis of TN ALCL (TN-I, 52% and TN-II, 38%; P=NS), and poor prognosis of TP63-R/DH ALCL (0%)(P<0.0001; Fig. 2). Conclusions: Two overarching molecular types of ALCL exist, predominantly associated with the presence (Type I) or absence (Type II) of the JAK-STAT3 signaling program. Distinct GEP signatures exist for ALK+ ALCL and BIA-ALCL (predominantly Type I), and DUSP22-R ALCL and TP63-R ALCL (predominantly Type II). TN ALCLs lacking ALK-R, DUSP22-R, and TP63-R can be stratified into TN-I and TN-II subtypes. pSTAT3 IHC has >90% accuracy as a surrogate for GEP-based subtyping. ALK- ALCL and cALCL cluster by molecular subtype rather than by defining GEP signatures. Type II ALCLs are enriched for targetable epigenetic and metabolic pathways, including EZH2/histone methylation and cholesterol biosynthesis. This molecular classification is diagnostically, prognostically, and potentially therapeutically relevant, and can be applied using FISH and IHC in routine practice and in the clinical trial setting.

Background: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is characterized by the presence of a clone with somatic mutations in genes associated with myeloid neoplasms (MN) or abnormal cytogenetics, along with unexplained and persistent cytopenias in the absence of significant marrow dysplasia. CCUS is considered a premalignant state with a risk of progression to MN. The clinical outcomes of patients (pts) with high risk CCUS (Weeks et al, NEJM Evidence 2023) may be similar that of some patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This study aims to predict the outcomes of CCUS patients using the molecular international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-M) developed for MDS. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients diagnosed with CCUS between 2015 and 2023, we included patients harboring pathogenic mutations (MUT) identified through next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing at two institutions: Mayo Clinic and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA were included. Progression was considered present if patients with CCUS progressed into myeloid neoplasm at follow up. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP® 17.1.0 Software. IPSS-M risk scores were calculated via the IPSS-M Risk Calculator (mds-risk-model.com). Results: A total of 103 patients were included in the study. The median age was 72 years, the majority were male patients (73%), and the median bone marrow blast % at the time of NGS was 1%. Forty-five % had an isolated mutation in a single gene, and 55% had co-mutations in ≥1 gene. The median number of mutations was 2 (range 1 - 5), occurring across 43 different genes. The most common mutations were in TET2 (N=28; 27%), ASXL1 (N=21; 20%), SRSF2 (N=21; 20%), U2AF1 (N=18; 17%), DNMT3A (N=16; 16%), and TP53 (N=12; 12%). Additionally, 25% of patients had an abnormal karyotype. Hematologic and genetic characteristics are summarized in (Table 1A). The median IPSS-M score was -0.9 (-3 to +2.34) and the median IPSS- Revised (R) score was 2 (0 - 6). The majority of patients had low (L) IPSS-M risk category (53%), followed by moderate low (ML) (19%) and very low (VL) (17%). Per IPSS-R, the majority had low-risk category (47%), followed by VL (38%) and intermediate (14%). Overall, 26 (25%) pt died after a median follow-up of 34 months and 21% progressed to MN (MDS 14 & CMML 8), and 1 patient with MDS and 1 with CMML progressed to secondary AML (2%). The median overall survival (mOS) was not reached, with a 2-year estimated (YE) OS and leukemia-free survival (LFS) of 80%. Predictive Power: When utilizing the IPSS-M risk category ( L, M, H) * by combining the risk categories into L *(L+VL), M * (ML+MH), and H *(H+VH) to overcome the low sample size limitation, it significantly predicted OS (p < .0001) ( Figure 1A) and median MN-free survival (FS) (p < .0001) ( Figure 1B). The 2YE-OS rates by IPSS-M risk category were as follows: VL - 93%, L - 87%, ML - 75%, high (H) - 25%, very high (VH) - 0% and the 2YE-OS rates by IPSS-M ( L, M, H) are summarized in Table 1B. IPSS-M hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.6 for ( M*) compared to 25 for ( H *) risk category (p < .0001). The ( L *) category, being the largest, was used as the reference level. Conclusion: This study provides the first real-world experience of using the IPSS-M and a modified version of the IPSS-M ( L, M, H) * risk category model to predict survival and progression into MN in CCUS (MUT) pt. The IPSS-M risk category was found to be a significant predictor of OS and MN-free survival. We propose that larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings.

Abstract The dismal outcome of acute leukemia undergoing immunophenotype-switch, compounded by the increased incidence in the era of immunotherapy, highlights the need for in-depth systemic studies. We investigated the clinicopathological, cytogenetic, and molecular features of 33 patients experiencing switch between acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The median duration from the primary diagnosis to lineage switch was 7.8 months, with the subsequent median survival being < 3 months. The majority experienced a transition from B-ALL to AML. The AML cases demonstrated a spectrum of differentiation, ranging from minimal to erythroid, with monocytic being the most common. Cytogenetic analysis revealed 11q23/KMT2A fusions as the most recurrent abnormalities (n = 18); also observed were complex karyotype, 7/7q-, 9p-/CDKN2A deletion, t(5;14)/TCLX3::BCL11b, t(8;9)/PCM1::JAK2, t(9;22)/BCR::ABL1, and t(12;19)/TCF3::ZNF384. Remarkably, in 60% of patients lacking KMT2A fusions, a chronic myeloid neoplasm was observed preceding the first leukemia. In contrast, no prior hematological malignancies were observed in KMT2A cases. Deep mutational profiling reinforced the inherent clonal relationship between the initial and subsequent leukemias, evident from the overlapping mutational signatures. The presence of distinct additional mutations across the two phases supports the long-standing theory of lineage switch emerging via divergent evolution of a multipotential progenitor.

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon malignancy of B-cell origin. Classical HL (cHL) and nodular lymphocyte–predominant HL are the 2 main types of HL. The cure rates for HL have increased so markedly with the advent of modern treatment options that overriding treatment considerations often relate to long-term toxicity. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for HL focusing on (1) radiation therapy dose constraints in the management of patients with HL, and (2) the management of advanced-stage and relapsed or refractory cHL.

AbstractBackgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluated by flow cytometry is a surrogate for progression‐free and overall survival in clinical trials. However, analysis and reporting between centers lack uniformity. We designed and evaluated a consensus protocol for MM MRD analysis to reduce inter‐laboratory variation in MM MRD reporting.MethodsSeventeen participants from 13 countries performed blinded analysis of the same eight de‐identified flow cytometry files from patients with/without MRD using their own method (Stage 1). A consensus gating protocol was then designed following survey and discussions, and the data re‐analyzed for MRD and other bone marrow cells (Stage 2). Inter‐laboratory variation using the consensus strategy was reassessed for another 10 cases and compared with earlier results (Stage 3).ResultsIn Stage 1, participants agreed on MRD+/MRD− status 89% and 68% of the time respectively. Inter‐observer variation was high for total numbers of analyzed cells, total and normal plasma cells (PCs), limit of detection, lower limit of quantification, and enumeration of cell populations that determine sample adequacy. The identification of abnormal PCs remained relatively consistent. By consensus method, average agreement on MRD− status improved to 74%. Better consistency enumerating all parameters among operators resulted in near‐unanimous agreement on sample adequacy.ConclusionUniform flow cytometry data analysis substantially reduced inter‐laboratory variation in reporting multiple components of the MM MRD assay. Adoption of a harmonized approach would meet an important need for conformity in reporting MM MRD for clinical trials, and wider acceptance of MM MRD as a surrogate clinical endpoint.

AimsIt is unknown whether Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection can occur in high‐grade B cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, also known as double‐ or triple‐hit lymphoma (DHL/THL).Methods and resultsHere we report 16 cases of EBV+ DHL/THL from screening 846 cases of DHL/THL and obtaining additional EBV+ cases through multi‐institutional collaboration: eight MYC and BCL2 DHL, six MYC and BCL6 DHL and two THL. There were eight men and eight women, with a median age of 65 years (range = 32–86). Two patients had a history of follicular lymphoma and one had AIDS. Nine of 14 patients had an International Prognostic Index of ≥3. Half of the cases showed high‐grade/Burkitt‐like morphology and the other half diffuse large B cell lymphoma morphology. Using immunohistochemistry, the lymphoma cells were positive for MYC (n = 14 of 16), BCL2 (n = 12 of 16), BCL6 (n = 14 of 16), CD10 (n = 13 of 16) and MUM1 (n = six of 14). Using Hans’ algorithm, 13 cases were classified as germinal centre B cell (GCB) and three as non‐GCB. The lymphomas frequently showed an EBV latency Type I with a median EBV‐encoded small RNAs of 80% positive cells (range = 20–100%). After a median follow‐up of 36.3 months (range = 2.0–41.6), seven patients died, with a median survival of 15.4 months (range = 3.4–47.3) after diagnosis of EBV+ DHL/THL. Five of six patients with MYC and BCL6 DHL were alive, including four in complete remission. In contrast, only four of 10 patients with MYC and BCL2 DHL or THL were alive, including two in complete remission. The median survival in patients with MYC and BCL6 DHL was unreached and was 21.6 months in patients with MYC and BCL2 DHL or THL.ConclusionsEBV infection in DHL/THL is rare (~1.5%). Cases of EBV+ DHL/THL are largely similar to their EBV– counterparts clinicopathologically. Our findings expand the spectrum of EBV+ B cell lymphomas currently recognised in the World Health Organisation classification and suggest differences between EBV+ MYC and BCL2 DHL versus EBV+MYC and BCL6 DHL that may have therapeutic implications.