Driscoll, Colin L.

ObjectivesIdentify predictors of high‐cost otolaryngology care.Study DesignCross‐sectional.SettingTertiary academic multispecialty hospital.Subjects/MethodsAll patients undergoing ≥1 otolaryngologic procedures from 2011 to 2015. Encounter costs were standardized using previously described methods approximating Medicare reimbursement. Patients were stratified by adult/pediatric and inpatient/outpatient. “Outliers” were defined as total encounter costs ≥95th percentile. Logistic regression measured predictors of outlier status.ResultsIn total, 2433 adult inpatient encounters (95th percentile $57,611), 10,031 adult outpatient encounters ($10,772), 346 pediatric inpatient encounters ($84,639), and 3027 pediatric outpatient encounters ($8978) were included. For adult inpatient and outpatient, isolated head and neck oncologic procedures were the reference group. Among adult inpatients, laryngology and facial plastics procedures predicted higher odds of outlier status (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1 and 7.2). Involvement of multiple otolaryngology subspecialties increased the odds (OR = 4.7). Neck dissection and reconstructive procedures were the most common primary operations for adult inpatient outliers. For adult outpatients, several subspecialties had lower odds than head and neck (OR ≤0.44). Increased comorbidities predicted outliers for adult inpatient care (OR = 1.5); sex, age, race, and ethnicity did not. Cochlear implant was the most common primary operation among adult and pediatric outpatient outliers. Greater subspecialty involvement and increasing age predicted pediatric outpatient outliers (OR = 8.0 and 1.1); younger age and female sex predicted pediatric inpatient outliers (OR = 0.8 and 3.5). Airway procedures dominated pediatric inpatient outliers.ConclusionThis is the first large‐scale study of high‐cost otolaryngology care across multiple subspecialties. Specific procedures and subspecialties and increased comorbidities predicted high‐cost care. Contrary to previous studies, patient sex, race, and ethnicity did not.

Abstract Selected upper cerebellopontine angle (CPA)/petroclival region lesions can be visualized and resected through a middle fossa approach with anterior petrosectomy. This approach is particularly well suited for tumors that extend from the CPA into Meckel's cave or the middle cranial fossa. We present the case of a 55-yr-old man who presented with sudden left-sided hearing loss, with complete recovery after medical treatment. MRI demonstrated a left 1.8 cm contrast-enhancing upper CPA lesion with extension into Meckel's cave most consistent with a trigeminal schwannoma. The patient initially opted for observation. MRI 11 mo later showed notable enlargement in the tumor, and the patient started to experience left-sided neuralgic face pain. The decision was made to perform surgery. Documented and verified informed consent was obtained A step-by-step surgical video with surgical anatomy images highlights the 5 steps followed by the authors to perform an anterior petrosectomy. The dura mater was opened parallel to the superior petrosal sinus both in the infratentorial and supratentorial spaces in order to clip and coagulate the superior petrosal sinus and divide the tentorium. The lesion was fully visualized and the trigeminal nerve was clearly identified displaced inferiorly but not splayed by the tumor, making the diagnosis of trigeminal schwannoma unlikely. The lesion was debulked and dissected off the brainstem as well as the trigeminal nerve with the final view of intact nerve fascicles entering the posterior aspect of Meckel's cave. Pathology returned as a WHO grade 1 meningioma. The patient recovered well with only mild facial hypesthesia and complete tumor resection on follow-up imaging.

Objective(1) Assess 3‐dimensional volumetric growth of untreated sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VSs) in a large cohort of patients treated with conservative observation. (2) Compare volumetric and conventional linear diameter measurements for detecting tumor growth.Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingTertiary skull base referral center.Subjects and MethodsPatients with sporadic VS who elected initial conservative treatment with at least 2 serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were included. Tumor volume was determined with 3‐dimensional segmentation of MRI sequences. The volumetric threshold for tumor growth was an increase ≥20% from baseline tumor volume. Tumor size based on linear diameter was assessed with the 1995 American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation guidelines for VS outcome reporting, with growth defined as an increase ≥2 mm.ResultsA total of 361 patients were included with a median radiologic follow‐up of 4.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5‐6.8). At diagnosis, 232 VSs (64%) were purely intracanalicular, and 129 (36%) extended into the cerebellopontine angle. The median baseline tumor volume was 0.161 cm3 (IQR, 0.054‐0.418). Overall, 69% of tumors demonstrated volumetric growth at a median of 1.1 years (IQR, 0.6‐2.1) after initial MRI. In contrast, based on linear measurement assessment, 48% of tumors demonstrated growth at a median of 1.8 years (IQR, 0.8‐3.1) from first MRI scan. Disequilibrium, facial hypoesthesia, aural fullness, initial tumor size, and nonincidental diagnosis were associated with tumor growth.ConclusionThree‐dimensional volumetric assessment of VS provides a more sensitive measure of tumor growth when compared with linear diameter assessment. Through volumetric analysis, the current study revealed that a significant proportion of VSs demonstrate growth during observation.

Introduction Vestibular schwannoma (VS) behavior following subtotal resection (STR) is highly variable. Overall progression rates have been reported as high as 44%, and optimal treatment is controversial. Correspondingly, identification of a reliable clinical or pathologic marker associated with progression after STR would help guide decision-making. Methods A prospectively maintained institutional VS registry from 1999 to 2014 was retrospectively reviewed for sporadic VS patients who underwent primary STR without preceding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) by a single neurosurgery-neurotology team. Primary endpoints included tumor progression and postoperative facial nerve function. Pathologic specimens were stained for Ki67, CD68, S100, and SOX10 and were quantitated by digital imaging analysis. Macrophage density was defined as the ratio of CD68+ macrophages to S100+ macrophages and Schwannian tumor cells. Clinical outcomes were correlated with pathologic markers. Results Forty-six patients met the study inclusion criteria. Thirteen (28%) progressed during a mean 57 months of follow-up (range 15–149). Favorable postoperative facial nerve function (House–Brackmann I–II) was achieved in 37 (80%). CD68+ cells were present at significantly higher concentrations in tumors that progressed (p = 0.03). Higher macrophage density was significantly associated with both tumor progression (p = 0.02) and unfavorable facial nerve function (p = 0.02). Ki67 percent positivity was not significantly associated with either primary endpoint (p = 0.83; p = 0.58). Conclusions Macrophage density may provide an important marker for individuals at the highest risk for progression of VS after STR, potentially prompting closer surveillance or consideration for upfront SRS following STR. This finding supports preceding conclusions that an intratumoral macrophage-predominant inflammatory response may be a marker for tumor growth and a potential therapeutic target.

Objective: To examine practice variance of cochlear implant candidacy assessment and off-label indications across centers in the United States. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of the American Neurotology Society (ANS). Results: A total of 81 surveys were returned from ANS members who report regular involvement in cochlear implant care. Overall there was a broad distribution in age and clinical experience, with most respondents reporting ACGME accreditation in neurotology and employment at an academic center. The annual volume of cochlear implant surgeries varied considerably across centers. Seventy-eight percent of respondents performed cochlear implantation for at least one of the following indications within the last 2 years: profound hearing loss in children less than 12 months of age (35, 43%), children with asymmetrical hearing loss where at least one ear was better than performance cutoff for age (25, 31%), adults with asymmetrical hearing where at least one ear was better than the performance cutoff for adult criteria (49, 61%), single-sided deafness (37, 46%), and ipsilateral vestibular schwannoma (28, 35%). Centers with a higher annual implant volume more frequently performed off-label implantation in all queried populations (all, p≤0.001), and performed surgery on infants with congenital deafness at a younger age (p = 0.013), compared with centers with lower surgical volume. When surveyed regarding speech perception testing practices for adult candidacy assessment, 75 (100%) respondents who answered this question reported routine use of AzBio sentences, 42 (56%) CNC word scores, and 26 (35%) HINT testing; only 7 (9%) reported using BKB-SIN testing and 6 (8%) reported using CUNY scores. Fifty-one (68%) reported routine use of speech-in-noise testing to determine adult cochlear implant candidacy, 21 (28%) reported selective use only when patient scores were borderline in quiet, and 3 (4%) reported that their center does not currently use testing in noise for candidacy determination. Nineteen (26%) solely used +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), 12 (16%) solely used +5 dB SNR, and 41 (55%) used both +10 and +5 dB SNR. Overall, 19% (N = 14) only perform unilateral implantation in the Medicare population, while 81% (N = 58) consider bilateral implantation. Conclusion: Significant variation in cochlear implant candidacy assessment and off-label implantation exists across centers and providers in the United States resulting in healthcare inequities. The high percentage of surgeons performing implantations for off-label or nontraditional indications reflects the overly restrictive and dated status of current implant guidelines. With greater adoption of more difficult speech perception testing in noise, careful clinical judgment is needed to maintain a favorable risk–benefit balance for prospective implant candidates.

Objective: To examine surgical and device-related cochlear implant practice patterns across centers in the United States. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of the American Neurotology Society (ANS). Results: A total of 81 surveys were returned from ANS members who report regular involvement in cochlear implant care. Overall there was a broad distribution in age and clinical experience, with most respondents reporting Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation in neurotology and employment at an academic center. The annual volume of cochlear implant surgeries varied considerably across centers. Eighty percent of respondents report to offer all three Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved device brands at their center. In cases where hearing preservation is not a goal, 56% of respondents prefer a perimodiolar electrode design, while 44% prefer a lateral wall electrode. With regard to insertion technique for scala tympani access, 64% prefer inserting through the round window (RW) membrane, 26% prefer an extended round window (ERW) approach, while only 10% prefer a cochleostomy. In cases where hearing preservation is a goal of surgery, 86% of respondents prefer a lateral wall electrode design, while only 14% prefer a perimodiolar electrode design. With regard to insertion technique, 86% prefer RW insertion, while only 9% prefer an ERW approach, and only 5% prefer a cochleostomy. Respondents who prefer RW electrode insertion more commonly use a lateral wall electrode, whereas those who prefer an ERW or cochleostomy approach more commonly use a periomodiolar electrode (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant greater number of surgeons that prefer lateral wall electrodes (p < 0.001) and RW insertion (p < 0.001) for hearing preservation cases compared with non-hearing preservation cases. For implantation of a hypothetical patient with significant residual hearing, within the range of hybrid device candidacy, the great majority of surgeons prefer a conventional length electrode and only 29% prefer to implant a hybrid device. In cases where hearing preservation is a goal, the overwhelming majority of respondents (96%, n = 74) reported using at least one form of steroid application. Ninety-two percent (n = 71) used intraoperative intravenous steroids, 55% (n = 42) prescribed postoperative oral steroids, 44% (n = 34) bathed the middle ear with steroids during surgery, and 30% (n = 23) prescribed preoperative oral steroids. Together, 65% of respondents use a variation of the tight subperiosteal pocket technique for internal device fixation, 19% prefer a bony well and trough with tie-downs, 10% prefer a bony well and trough without tie-downs, and 5% prefer a screw fixation system. Of the 50 who prefer utilizing a subperiosteal pocket, 31 (62%) incorporate a bony trough and 19 (38%) perform a subperiosteal pocket alone without a bony trough. Conclusion: The results of this survey reflect the evolution in surgical and device-related preferences for cochlear implantation in the United States. An increasing number of surgeons prefer the RW approach for electrode insertion. When hearing preservation is not a goal, there is a near even preference for lateral wall and perimodiolar electrode designs; however, the great majority of surgeons prefer a lateral wall design when attempting to preserve residual acoustic hearing. Even in cases where substantial residual hearing exists, many surgeons prefer conventional length electrodes to hybrid designs. These changes reflect the prioritization of atraumatic surgery and parallel the development of thinner and more atraumatic electrodes.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the use of monosyllabic word recognition versus sentence recognition to determine candidacy and long‐term benefit for cochlear implantation.Study DesignProspective multi‐center single‐subject design.MethodsA total of 21 adults aged 18 years and older with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss and low monosyllabic word scores received unilateral cochlear implantation. The consonant‐nucleus‐consonant (CNC) word test was the central measure of pre‐ and postoperative performance. Additional speech understanding tests included the Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet and AzBio sentences in +5 dB signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). Quality of life (QoL) was measured using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Health Utilities Index.ResultsPerformance on sentence recognition reached the ceiling of the test after only 3 months of implant use. In contrast, none of the participants in this study reached a score of 80% on CNC word recognition, even at the 12‐month postoperative test interval. Measures of QoL related to hearing were also significantly improved following implantation.ConclusionResults of this study demonstrate that monosyllabic words are appropriate for determining preoperative candidate and measuring long‐term postoperative speech recognition performance.Level of Evidence2c. Laryngoscope, 127:2368–2374, 2017

Objectives/HypothesisThis study was designed to examine speech recognition and self‐perceived health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) received from cochlear implantation among a cohort of adults and children with a short duration of unilateral hearing loss greater than 6 months, but less than 2 years.Study DesignSingle‐subject repeated measures prospective study.MethodsThis study assessed changes in speech recognition and self‐perceived quality of life by prospectively analyzing data at the preoperative evaluation and at the 3‐month and 6‐month postactivation intervals. Measurement tools included Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing–Comparative, and speech recognition measures in quiet and in noise.ResultsResults indicated significant improvement in speech recognition, both in quiet and noise. Quality‐of‐life measures showed a significant increase in self‐perceived benefit with disease‐specific instruments, but remained constant with a generic HRQoL instrument.ConclusionsCochlear implantation was a successful intervention for improved hearing in quiet and noise, and a self‐perceived benefit for this group of adults and children with a short duration of unilateral hearing loss.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 127:1683–1688, 2017

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate outcomes of salvage surgery for vestibular schwannoma (VS) that failed primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).MethodsCase‐control study of 37 patients who underwent surgical resection of sporadic VS following prior SRS at two tertiary academic referral centers between 2003 and 2015. A cohort of nonirradiated control subjects, matched according to tumor size, age, and treatment center, were used as comparison.ResultsThirty‐seven patients were included. The median time from radiation to surgical salvage was 36 months (range 9.6–153 months). Following tumor progression after SRS, 18 (49%) patients underwent gross total resection, 10 (27%) underwent near‐total resection, and nine (24%) underwent subtotal resection. Postoperative complications following salvage surgery included one (3%) case of stroke, four (11%) cases of cerebrospinal fluid leak, and two (5%) cases of meningitis. Twenty‐seven (73%) patients had good postoperative facial nerve outcome (House‐Brackmann Score I–II) at long‐term follow‐up. There were no cases of tumor recurrence or regrowth after a median length of 26 months following microsurgical salvage (range 3–114 months). The rate of satisfactory postoperative facial nerve function was not different between study and control subjects (73% vs. 76%; P = 0.8); however, less‐than‐complete resection was utilized more frequently among previously radiated patients (P = 0.01).ConclusionMicrosurgical salvage of VS following primary radiation therapy is challenging. Less‐than‐complete resection is required in a greater percentage of patients to preserve facial nerve integrity and prevent neurological complications. Long‐term follow‐up is needed to determine the risk of delayed progression following incomplete tumor removal.Level of Evidence3b. Laryngoscope, 126:2580–2586, 2016