Peterson, Ann

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine if older adults with cochlear implants are able to take advantage of coding schemes that preserve temporal fine structure (TFS) cues. Design: A total of 19 older adults with cochlear implants participated in a prospective, repeated measures, A to B design. Participants entered the study using TFS. The participants used strategy A (high definition continuous interleaved sampling [HDCIS]) for 3 months and strategy B (TFS) for 3 months. Endpoint testing was administered at the end of each 3-month period. Testing included consonant recognition, speech understanding in noise, temporal modulation thresholds, and self-perceived benefit. Results: Older adults were able to use TFS successfully. Speech perception performance was improved using TFS compared with HDCIS for voicing, but not manner or place of articulation. There were no differences between the two strategies for speech understanding in noise, temporal modulation detection, or self-perceived benefit. At the end of the study, 13 out of 19 (68%) of participants chose to continue using TFS processing. Conclusions: Advanced age does not prevent adults with cochlear implants from using TFS coding strategies. Performance outcomes using TFS and HDCIS were similar, with the exception of voicing which was improved when using TFS. The data support the idea of using various sound processing strategies with older adults.

Objectives/HypothesisThis study was designed to examine speech recognition and self‐perceived health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) received from cochlear implantation among a cohort of adults and children with a short duration of unilateral hearing loss greater than 6 months, but less than 2 years.Study DesignSingle‐subject repeated measures prospective study.MethodsThis study assessed changes in speech recognition and self‐perceived quality of life by prospectively analyzing data at the preoperative evaluation and at the 3‐month and 6‐month postactivation intervals. Measurement tools included Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36, Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing–Comparative, and speech recognition measures in quiet and in noise.ResultsResults indicated significant improvement in speech recognition, both in quiet and noise. Quality‐of‐life measures showed a significant increase in self‐perceived benefit with disease‐specific instruments, but remained constant with a generic HRQoL instrument.ConclusionsCochlear implantation was a successful intervention for improved hearing in quiet and noise, and a self‐perceived benefit for this group of adults and children with a short duration of unilateral hearing loss.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 127:1683–1688, 2017