Hoefner, Daniel M

Abstract Background: Recent evidence suggests that the presence of small, dense LDL is independently associated with increased risk of developing coronary artery disease. Current methods to subfractionate LDL are time-consuming and/or technically demanding. Therefore, we have sought the development of a less complex LDL subfractionation procedure. Methods: LDL subfractions were separated using the Quantimetrix LipoprintTM LDL System. High-resolution 3% polyacrylamide gel tubes were scanned densitometrically (610 nm) with a Helena EDC system. A computerized method to identify and quantitatively score the resolved LDL subfractions was developed. Results from the Quantimetrix method were compared using 51 plasma samples with values obtained by nondenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (NDGGE) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Results: LDL subfractionation scores correlated significantly (P <0.05) with triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B100, and LDL-cholesterol/apolipoprotein B100 (r = 0.591, −0.392, 0.454, and −0.411, respectively). For 51 samples, the Quantimetrix method classified 21 with small, 14 with intermediate, and 16 with large LDL. Of the 21 samples classified as small by Quantimetrix, 20 (95%) were classified as small (n = 18) or intermediate (n = 2) by NDGGE. All of the 16 specimens classified as large by Quantimetrix were either large (n = 14) or intermediate (n = 2) by NDGGE. LDL score was inversely correlated (r = −0.674; P <0.0001) with LDL particle size determined by NMR spectroscopy. Conclusions: A quantitative method for the assessment of LDL particle size phenotype was developed using the Quantimetrix Lipoprint LDL System. The method can be performed in less than 3 h in batch mode and is suitable for routine use in clinical laboratories.

Abstract Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been the cornerstone measurement for assessing cardiovascular risk for nearly 20 years. Content: Recent data demonstrate that apolipoprotein B (apo B) is a better measure of circulating LDL particle number (LDL-P) concentration and is a more reliable indicator of risk than LDL-C, and there is growing support for the idea that addition of apo B measurement to the routine lipid panel for assessing and monitoring patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) would enhance patient management. In this report, we review the studies of apo B and LDL-P reported to date, discuss potential advantages of their measurement over that of LDL-C, and present information related to standardization. Conclusions: In line with recently adopted Canadian guidelines, the addition of apo B represents a logical next step to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATPIII) and other guidelines in the US. Considering that it has taken years to educate physicians and patients regarding the use of LDL-C, changing perceptions and practices will not be easy. Thus, it appears prudent to consider using apo B along with LDL-C to assess LDL-related risk for an interim period until the superiority of apo B is generally recognized.