Miao, Yi

Objective: The REDISCOVER consensus conference aimed at developing and validating guidelines on the perioperative care of patients with borderline-resectable (BR-) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Background: Coupled with improvements in chemotherapy and radiation, the contemporary approach to pancreatic surgery supports the resection of BR-PDAC and, to a lesser extent, LA-PDAC. Guidelines outlining the selection and perioperative care for these patients are lacking. Methods: The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used to develop the REDISCOVER guidelines and create recommendations. The Delphi approach was used to reach a consensus (agreement ≥80%) among experts. Recommendations were approved after a debate and vote among international experts in pancreatic surgery and pancreatic cancer management. A Validation Committee used the AGREE II-GRS tool to assess the methodological quality of the guidelines. Moreover, an independent multidisciplinary advisory group revised the statements to ensure adherence to nonsurgical guidelines. Results: Overall, 34 recommendations were created targeting centralization, training, staging, patient selection for surgery, possibility of surgery in uncommon scenarios, timing of surgery, avoidance of vascular reconstruction, details of vascular resection/reconstruction, arterial divestment, frozen section histology of perivascular tissue, extent of lymphadenectomy, anticoagulation prophylaxis, and role of minimally invasive surgery. The level of evidence was however low for 29 of 34 clinical questions. Participants agreed that the most conducive means to promptly advance our understanding in this field is to establish an international registry addressing this patient population (https://rediscover.unipi.it/). Conclusions: The REDISCOVER guidelines provide clinical recommendations pertaining to pancreatectomy with vascular resection for patients with BR-PDAC and LA-PDAC, and serve as the basis of a new international registry for this patient population.

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an approved treatment for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD: Crohn’s disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]), psoriasis (PsO), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we present pooled safety analyses in these approved indications of patients (pts) with active tuberculosis (TB) and opportunistic infections (OIs) through 5 years (yrs) of UST treatment. Methods Pooled data included 13 Phase 2/3 UST studies through 5 yrs of CD and PsO, 2 yrs of UC, and 1 yr of PsA. OIs were identified by clinician review. Herpes zoster (HZ) was evaluated separately. Event rates per 100 pt yrs (PYs) are presented. Concomitant immunomodulators/corticosteroids were permitted in IBD and PsA pts. All pts who received ≥1 UST dose were included. In IBD, placebo (PBO) pts included data up to the first UST dose for pts initially treated with PBO, or >16 weeks after the last UST dose for UST pts who switched to PBO. Results Across all approved indications, 19 OIs including TB were reported, with rates in PBO of 0.40 and UST of 0.10 through 5 yrs in 13807 PYs of follow-up (Table 1); rates of HZ were 1.21 and 0.63, respectively. Of 19 OIs, 18 were in IBD pts and 1 in a PsO pt. Overall, 14/16 pts (12/13 UST) with OIs excluding TB were also receiving confounding concomitant medications. A total of 3 active TB cases (2 pts with CD and 1 pt with UC) were reported in PBO (n=2; 1 in a Hungarian CD pt 10 months after receiving last UST dose) and UST (n=1) pts (Table 1). One active TB case was reported in an asymptomatic South African CD pt treated with UST who had a positive QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test on routine screening and bronchial brushings positive for M. tuberculosis. Both CD pts completed TB treatment with disease resolution. The most common OIs were esophageal candidiasis (UST n=3; PBO n=2) and cytomegalovirus colitis (UST n=3; PBO n=1). Conclusion Rates of OIs, including active TB, in UST-treated pts were low across approved indications through up to 5 yrs with 13807 PYs of follow-up and not higher in UST pts vs PBO pts, suggesting no increased risk of OI with long-term UST treatment.

Objective: The ISGPS aimed to develop a universally accepted definition for PPAP for standardized reporting and outcome comparison. Background: : PPAP is an increasingly recognized complication after partial pancreatic resections, but its incidence and clinical impact, and even its existence are variable because an internationally accepted consensus definition and grading system are lacking. Methods: The ISGPS developed a consensus definition and grading of PPAP with its members after an evidence review and after a series of discussions and multiple revisions from April 2020 to May 2021. Results: We defined PPAP as an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreatic remnant beginning within the first 3 postoperative days after a partial pancreatic resection. The diagnosis requires (1) a sustained postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) greater than the institutional upper limit of normal for at least the first 48 hours postoperatively, (2) associated with clinically relevant features, and (3) radiologic alterations consistent with PPAP. Three different PPAP grades were defined based on the clinical impact: (1) grade postoperative hyperamylasemia, biochemical changes only; (2) grade B, mild or moderate complications; and (3) grade C, severe life-threatening complications. Discussions: The present definition and grading scale of PPAP, based on biochemical, radiologic, and clinical criteria, are instrumental for a better understanding of PPAP and the spectrum of postoperative complications related to this emerging entity. The current terminology will serve as a reference point for standard assessment and lend itself to developing specific treatments and prevention strategies.