Srihari, Ashok

Abstract Context. Thyroid nodule ultrasound findings are crucial in guiding management decisions for patients with thyroid nodules. However, the frequency with which ultrasound images are discussed and reviewed with patients during clinical visits is not well understood. Objective. To assess how often thyroid ultrasound images are shown and discussed with patients during consultations, and to identify predictors of image review during clinical visits. Design and setting. Secondary analysis of a multicenter pilot randomized clinical trial conducted at two academic medical centers in the United States. Participants. Adults undergoing evaluation for thyroid nodules. Intervention. Participants were randomized to receive either usual care or care enhanced with a conversation aid. Main Outcome Measures. The primary outcome was the frequency of thyroid nodule imaging review evaluated as a binary outcome. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of predictors of image discussion. Results. Eighty-five patients were evaluated. Most participants were women (80%), mean age (60 years, SD 16), and White (86%), undergoing new patient visits (84%). Thyroid nodule ultrasound images were reviewed with patients in 53% of visits (45/85), and in all cases, clinicians initiated the imaging discussion. Predictors of image review included type of consultation (new patient visit) (OR 10.6, 95% CI: 1.79, 62.3). Age, sex, study arm, thyroid nodule size or cancer risk and plan of care (e.g., completing a biopsy) were not statistically associated with review of clinical images. Conclusions. Review of thyroid ultrasound images during clinical visits is relatively common, with consultation type serving as significant predictor.

AbstractObjectiveTo support patient‐centred care and the collaboration of patients and clinicians, we developed and pilot tested a conversation aid for patients with thyroid nodules.Design, Patient and MeasurementsWe developed a web‐based Thyroid NOdule Conversation aid (TNOC) following a human‐centred design. A proof of concept observational pre–post study was conducted (TNOC vs. usual care [UC]) to assess the impact of TNOC on the quality of conversations. Data sources included recordings of clinical visits, post‐encounter surveys and review of electronic health records. Summary statistics and group comparisons are reported.ResultsSixty‐five patients were analysed (32 in the UC and 33 in the TNOC cohort). Most patients were women (89%) with a median age of 57 years and were incidentally found to have a thyroid nodule (62%). Most thyroid nodules were at low risk for thyroid cancer (71%) and the median size was 1.4 cm. At baseline, the groups were similar except for higher numeracy in the TNOC cohort. The use of TNOC was associated with increased involvement of patients in the decision‐making process, clinician satisfaction and discussion of relevant topics for decision making. In addition, decreased decisional conflict and fewer thyroid biopsies as the next management step were noted in the TNOC cohort. No differences in terms of knowledge transfer, length of consultation, thyroid cancer risk perception or concern for thyroid cancer diagnosis were found.ConclusionIn this pilot observational study, using TNOC in clinical practice was feasible and seemed to help the collaboration of patients and clinicians.