Mitzman, Brian

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery in the US, disparities in its use persist. One unexplored contributor is geographic access to robotic surgical systems. This study evaluates the geospatial association between: (1) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and open surgery rates, (2) availability of robotic systems and open surgery, and (3) open surgery rates in demographically similar areas with differing robotic access. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 6 sources were linked at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level to identify hospitals and to extract procedure modality, presence of robotic systems, and area characteristics. Regression analysis assessed the association between SVI and open surgery rates. Open rates were then compared between hospitals with and without robotic systems. Propensity score matching was used to compare open rates across matched ZCTAs by robotic access and SVI levels. RESULTS: Higher social vulnerability was associated with increased open surgery rates (estimate = 0.20; p < 0.01), with rates ranging from 18.3% in low-vulnerability areas to 32.7% in high-vulnerability areas. Among 3,446 eligible ZCTAs, 57% had at least 1 robotic system. ZCTAs without robotic systems had higher open surgery rates (42.9 vs 19.4 per 100 procedures; relative rate = 2.21; p < 0.01). This association remained significant after matching (relative rate = 1.66; p < 0.01), for the low-mid- and high-SVI strata, and 3 of the 5 procedures examined. CONCLUSIONS: When correcting for geographic variation, the availability of robotic surgery was associated with a decrease in open surgery rates.

Importance: Many patients who would benefit from minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have open surgery; robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) addresses some of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery and could increase rates of MIS across different patient populations. Objective: To determine whether the introduction of RAS increases MIS rates and whether increases are seen across different patient populations undergoing common general surgery procedures. Design: A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare rates of MIS in the year before and after the index date for hospitals that did and did not introduce RAS. Generalized estimating equation regression models were used to compare rates in MIS over time. Setting: PINC AI Healthcare Database, an all-payor discharge database of hospitals in the United States. Participants: Hospitals that performed cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, ventral hernia repair, and colorectal resection from 2016 to 2022. Exposure: RAS hospitals performing at least 1 common general surgery procedure using RAS. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary analysis examined rates of MIS, defined as the rate of common general surgeries that were minimally invasive (laparoscopic or RAS) in a hospital. The secondary analysis examined MIS rates for common general surgeries, across age, sex, race, ethnicity, and payor. Results: Of 408 hospitals included in the study, 153 (38%) introduced RAS for common general surgeries. The relative MIS rate for hospitals that introduced RAS compared with hospitals that did not went from 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.14; P < 0.01) before the index date to 1.15 (95% CI, 1.09–1.22; P < 0.01) after the index date (P interaction < 0.01), indicating a larger increase in MIS rates among hospitals introducing RAS. MIS rates increased significantly more in hospitals that introduced RAS across patient age, sex, ethnicity, race, and payor compared with hospitals that did not introduce RAS. Conclusions and Relevance: Hospitals that introduced RAS for common general surgery procedures were associated with an increase in MIS rates across different patient populations compared with hospitals that did not introduce RAS.

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of open lobectomy (OL), VATS, and robotic-assisted lobectomy (RL). Summary Background Data: Robotic-assisted lobectomy has seen increasing adoption for treatment of early-stage lung cancer. Comparative data regarding these approaches is largely from single-institution case series or administrative datasets. Methods: Retrospective data was collected from 21 institutions from 2013 to 2019. All consecutive cases performed for clinical stage IA-IIIA lung cancer were included. Neoadjuvant cases were excluded. Propensity-score matching (1:1) was based on age, sex, race, smoking-status, FEV1%, Zubrod score, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size, and clinical T and N stage. Results: A total of 2391 RL, 2174 VATS, and 1156 OL cases were included. After propensity-score matching there were 885 pairs of RL vs OL, 1,711 pairs of RL vs VATS, and 952 pairs of VATS vs OL. Operative time for RL was shorter than VATS (P < 0.0001) and OL (P = 0.0004). Compared to OL, RL and VATS had less overall postoperative complications, shorter hospital stay (LOS), and lower transfusion rates (all P<0.02). Compared to VATS, RL had lower conversion rate (P<0.0001), shorter hospital stay (P<0.0001) and a lower postoperative transfusion rate (P =0.01). RL and VATS cohorts had comparable postoperative complication rates. In-hospital mortality was comparable between all groups. Conclusions: RL and VATS approaches were associated with favorable perioperative outcomes compared to OL. Robotic-assisted lobectomy was also associated with a reduced length of stay and decreased conversion rate when compared to VATS.