Rosenberg, Alex

OBJECTIVES: Among patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) admitted to the ICU in high-income countries, regional practice variations for fluid balance (FB) management, timing, and choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality may be significant. DESIGN: Secondary post hoc analysis of the STandard vs. Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02568722). SETTING: One hundred-fifty-three ICUs in 13 countries. PATIENTS: Altogether 2693 critically ill patients with AKI, of whom 994 were North American, 1143 European, and 556 from Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total mean FB to a maximum of 14 days was +7199 mL in North America, +5641 mL in Europe, and +2211 mL in ANZ (p < 0.001). The median time to RRT initiation among patients allocated to the standard strategy was longest in Europe compared with North America and ANZ (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Continuous RRT was the initial RRT modality in 60.8% of patients in North America and 56.8% of patients in Europe, compared with 96.4% of patients in ANZ (p < 0.001). After adjustment for predefined baseline characteristics, compared with North American and European patients, those in ANZ were more likely to survive to ICU (p < 0.001) and hospital discharge (p < 0.001) and to 90 days (for ANZ vs. Europe: risk difference [RD], –11.3%; 95% CI, –17.7% to –4.8%; p < 0.001 and for ANZ vs. North America: RD, –10.3%; 95% CI, –17.5% to –3.1%; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Among STARRT-AKI trial centers, significant regional practice variation exists regarding FB, timing of initiation of RRT, and initial use of continuous RRT. After adjustment, such practice variation was associated with lower ICU and hospital stay and 90-day mortality among ANZ patients compared with other regions.

Abstract Background: Young doctors have made up a substantial part of healthcare forces during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and level of psychological distress among young doctors during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: This cross-sectional cohort study, dedicated to doctors, at or below the age of 40, was conducted in 62 countries as an online survey between September – November 2020. Survey questions covered the following areas: 1. demographics 2. work environment 3.the ‘Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)’ and the ‘Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10)’. The primary outcome was the rate and level of anxiety/depression and stress among surveyed population defined according to adopted cut off values (HADS>13, PSS-10>14). Secondary outcomes included risk factors for increased HADS and PSS-10 scores.Results: Among 1186 respondents, median aged 32 [29–36], 675 (44.5%) females, 96% reported a high level of anxiety/depression and 97% reported a high level of stress. Factors associated with significantly higher scores for anxiety/depression were increased work hours [OR 1.61 95%CI (1.12–2.34);p=0.01] and loss of pay [OR 5.53, 95% CI (1.57–19.47);p=0.008], while reduced work hours [OR 0.68 95% CI (0.48 - 0.98);p=0.03], increased salaries [OR 0.54 95% CI (0.35–0.85);p=0.003) and good training [OR 0.99 95%CI (0.99– 1.00);p=0.002] were associated with lower scores. Higher scores for stress were associated with higher professional experience [OR 1.08 95% CI (1.02–1.14);p=0.008], reduced salaries [OR 1.74 95% CI (1.01–2.92);p=0.04] and living with a partner [OR 1.53 95% CI (1.08–2.17);p=0.01]. Conclusions: A high rate of young doctors working clinically during the COVID-19 pandemic reported a persistently high level of psychological distress more than six months after the initial outbreak. Improvements in work organization, including reduced work hours and financial security are essential to prevent further psychological suffering among young doctors worldwide.