Lee, Kerry L.

Background The impact of diabetes mellitus on the clinical presentation and noninvasive test ( NIT ) results among stable outpatients presenting with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease ( CAD ) has not been well described. Methods and Results The PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial enrolled 10 003 patients with known diabetic status, of whom 8966 were tested as randomized and had interpretable NIT results (1908 with diabetes mellitus, 21%). Differences in symptoms and NIT results were evaluated using logistic regression. Patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) were similar in age (median 61 versus 60 years) and sex (female 54% versus 52%), had a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities, and had a similar likelihood of nonchest pain symptoms (29% versus 27%). The Diamond‐Forrester/Coronary Artery Surgery Study score predicted that patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) had similar likelihood of obstructive CAD (low 1.8% versus 2.7%; intermediate 92.3% versus 92.6%; high 5.9% versus 4.7%). Physicians estimated patients with diabetes mellitus to have a higher likelihood of obstructive CAD (low to very low: 28.3% versus 40.1%; intermediate 63.9% versus 55.9%; high to very high 7.8% versus 4.0%). Patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) were more likely to have a positive NIT result (15% versus 11%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; P =0.01). Conclusions Stable chest pain patients with and without diabetes mellitus have similar presentation and pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD ; however, physicians perceive that patients with diabetes mellitus have a higher pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD , an assessment supported by increased risk of a positive NIT . Further evaluation of diabetes mellitus's influence on CAD assessment is required. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01174550.

Background— Oxidative stress may contribute to heart failure (HF) progression. Inhibiting xanthine oxidase in hyperuricemic HF patients may improve outcomes. Methods and Results— We randomly assigned 253 patients with symptomatic HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, and serum uric acid levels ≥9.5 mg/dL to receive allopurinol (target dose, 600 mg daily) or placebo in a double-blind, multicenter trial. The primary composite end point at 24 weeks was based on survival, worsening HF, and patient global assessment. Secondary end points included change in quality of life, submaximal exercise capacity, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Uric acid levels were significantly reduced with allopurinol in comparison with placebo (treatment difference, –4.2 [–4.9, –3.5] mg/dL and –3.5 [–4.2, –2.7] mg/dL at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively, both P <0.0001). At 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in clinical status between the allopurinol- and placebo-treated patients (worsened 45% versus 46%, unchanged 42% versus 34%, improved 13% versus 19%, respectively; P =0.68). At 12 and 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores or 6-minute walk distances between the 2 groups. At 24 weeks, left ventricular ejection fraction did not change in either group or between groups. Rash occurred more frequently with allopurinol (10% versus 2%, P =0.01), but there was no difference in serious adverse event rates between the groups (20% versus 15%, P =0.36). Conclusions— In high-risk HF patients with reduced ejection fraction and elevated uric acid levels, xanthine oxidase inhibition with allopurinol failed to improve clinical status, exercise capacity, quality of life, or left ventricular ejection fraction at 24 weeks. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00987415.

Background— Congestion is a primary driver of symptoms in patients with acute heart failure, and relief of congestion is a critical goal of therapy. Monitoring of response to therapy through the assessment of daily weights and net fluid loss is the current standard of care, yet the relationship between commonly used markers of decongestion and both patient reported symptom relief and clinical outcomes are unknown. Methods and Results— We performed a retrospective analysis of the randomized clinical trial, Diuretic Optimization Strategy Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF), enrolling patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure. We assessed the relationship among 3 markers of decongestion at 72 hours—weight loss, net fluid loss, and percent reduction in serum N terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level—and relief of symptoms as defined by the dyspnea visual analog scale area under the curve. We also determined the relationship between each marker of decongestion and 60-day clinical outcomes defined as time to death, first rehospitalization or emergency department visit. Mean age was 66 years, mean ejection fraction was 35%, and 27% had ejection fraction ≥50%. Of the 3 measures of decongestion assessed, only percent reduction in NT-proBNP was significantly associated with symptom relief ( r =0.13; P =0.04). There was no correlation between either weight loss or net fluid loss and symptom relief, ( r =0.04; P =0.54 and r =0.07; P =0.27, respectively). Favorable changes in each of the 3 markers of decongestion were associated with improvement in time to death, rehospitalization, or emergency department visit at 60 days (weight: hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.85–0.97 per 4 lbs; weight lost; fluid hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–0.99 per 1000 mL fluid loss; NT-proBNP hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–0.99 per 10% reduction). These associations were unchanged after multivariable adjustment with the exception that percent reduction in NT-proBNP was no longer a significant predictor (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.93–1.02). The rates of death, HF hospitalization, or emergency department visit at 60 days for patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 markers of decongestion (above the median) were 67%, 64%, 46%, and 38%, respectively (log rank P value=0.05). Figure. Relationship between number of markers of decongestion above median* and time to 60-day risk of emergency department (ED) visit, rehospitalization, or death. *Median net fluid loss, 3.8 L; median net weight loss, 6.5 lbs; median percent reduction in N terminal B-type natriuretic peptide 24.3%. Conclusions— Weight loss, fluid loss, and NT-proBNP reduction at 72 hours are poorly correlated with dyspnea relief. However, favorable improvements in each of the 3 markers were associated with improved clinical outcomes at 60 days. These data suggest the need for ongoing research to understand the relationships among symptom relief, congestion, and outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00577135.

Background— Whether mitral valve repair during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves survival in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) remains unknown. Methods and Results— Patients with ejection fraction ≤35% and coronary artery disease amenable to CABG were randomized at 99 sites worldwide to medical therapy with or without CABG. The decision to treat the mitral valve during CABG was left to the surgeon. The primary end point was mortality. Of 1212 randomized patients, 435 (36%) had none/trace MR, 554 (46%) had mild MR, 181 (15%) had moderate MR, and 39 (3%) had severe MR. In the medical arm, 70 deaths (32%) occurred in patients with none/trace MR, 114 (44%) in those with mild MR, and 58 (50%) in those with moderate to severe MR. In patients with moderate to severe MR, there were 29 deaths (53%) among 55 patients randomized to CABG who did not receive mitral surgery (hazard ratio versus medical therapy, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.87) and 21 deaths (43%) among 49 patients who received mitral surgery (hazard ratio versus medical therapy, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.35–1.08). After adjustment for baseline prognostic variables, the hazard ratio for CABG with mitral surgery versus CABG alone was 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.22–0.77; P =0.006). Conclusion— Although these observational data suggest that adding mitral valve repair to CABG in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and moderate to severe MR may improve survival compared with CABG alone or medical therapy alone, a prospective randomized trial is necessary to confirm the validity of these observations. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00023595.