Back to Authors

Khanna, Narendra N.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6935-0039

Mayo Clinic

Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals

Citations 15

Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Diabetic Retinopathy via Atherosclerotic Pathway in COVID-19/Non-COVID-19 Frameworks Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review
Munjral, Smiksha , Maindarkar, Mahesh , Ahluwalia, Puneet , Jujaray, Tanay, Suri, Neha, Paul, Sudip , Saba, Luca , Chalakkal, Renoh Johnson , Gupta, Suneet Kumar , Faa, Gavino , Singh, Inder M. , Chadha, Paramjit S., Turk, Monika, Johri, Amer M. , Khanna, Narendra N. , Višković, Klaudija , Laird, John R. , Pareek, Gyan , Miner, Martin , Sobel, David , Balestrieri, Antonella , Sfikakis, Petros P. , Tsoulfas, George, Protogerou, Athanase D. , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Agarwal, Vikas , Teji, Jagjit S. , Al-Maini, Mustafa , Dhanjil, Surinder, Sockalingam, Meyypan, Saxena, Ajit Kumar , Rathore, Vijay , Fatemi, Mostafa , Viswanathan, Vijay , Krishnan, Padukode R., Omerzu, Tomaž , Naidu, Subbaram, Fouda, Mostafa M. , Suri, Jasjit S. , Paul, Sudip , Chalakkal, Renoh Johnson , Faa, Gavino , Viskovic, Klaudija , Sobel, David W , Tsoulfas, George , Protogerou, Athanasios , Agarwal, Vikas , Fatemi, Mostafa , Naidu, Subbaram , Fouda, Mostafa M , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Maindarkar, Mahesh A , Munjral, Smiksha , Puvvula, Anudeep , Jamthikar, Ankush D. , Pathak, Rajesh, Mavrogeni, Sophie , Kitas, George D. , Kolluri, Raghu , Sharma, Aditya , Alizad, Azra , Nicolaides, Andrew , Suri, Jasjit S.

Diagnostics | May 15, 2022 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1234

10.3390/diagnostics12051234 Get It

Diabetes is one of the main causes of the rising cases of blindness in adults. This microvascular complication of diabetes is termed diabetic retinopathy (DR) and is associated with an expanding risk of cardiovascular events in diabetes patients. DR, in its various forms, is seen to be a powerful indicator of atherosclerosis. Further, the macrovascular complication of diabetes leads to coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, the timely identification of cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications in DR patients is of utmost importance. Since CAD risk assessment is expensive for low-income countries, it is important to look for surrogate biomarkers for risk stratification of CVD in DR patients. Due to the common genetic makeup between the coronary and carotid arteries, low-cost, high-resolution imaging such as carotid B-mode ultrasound (US) can be used for arterial tissue characterization and risk stratification in DR patients. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques has facilitated the handling of large cohorts in a big data framework to identify atherosclerotic plaque features in arterial ultrasound. This enables timely CVD risk assessment and risk stratification of patients with DR. Thus, this review focuses on understanding the pathophysiology of DR, retinal and CAD imaging, the role of surrogate markers for CVD, and finally, the CVD risk stratification of DR patients. The review shows a step-by-step cyclic activity of how diabetes and atherosclerotic disease cause DR, leading to the worsening of CVD. We propose a solution to how AI can help in the identification of CVD risk. Lastly, we analyze the role of DR/CVD in the COVID-19 framework.
COVLIAS 1.0 vs. MedSeg: Artificial Intelligence-Based Comparative Study for Automated COVID-19 Computed Tomography Lung Segmentation in Italian and Croatian Cohorts
Suri, Jasjit S. , Agarwal, Sushant , Carriero, Alessandro , Paschè, Alessio , Danna, Pietro , Columbu, Marta, Saba, Luca , Višković, Klaudija , Mehmedović, Armin , Agarwal, Samriddhi, Gupta, Lakshya, Faa, Gavino , Singh, Inder M. , Turk, Monika, Chadha, Paramjit S., Johri, Amer M. , Khanna, Narendra N. , Laird, John R. , Pareek, Gyan , Miner, Martin , Sobel, David , Balestrieri, Antonella , Sfikakis, Petros P. , Tsoulfas, George, Protogerou, Athanase D. , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Agarwal, Vikas , Teji, Jagjit S. , Al-Maini, Mustafa , Dhanjil, Surinder, Rathore, Vijay , Fatemi, Mostafa , Krishnan, Pudukode R., Nagy, F. , Ruzsa, Zoltán , Naidu, Subbaram , Paraskevas, Kosmas I. , Danna, Pietro S C , Tsoulfas, George , Protogerou, Athanasios , Fatemi, Mostafa , Alizad, Azra , Ferenc, Nagy , Ruzsa, Zoltan , Paraskevas, Kosmas I , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Agarwal, Vikas , Faa, Gavino , Mehmedović, Armin , Agarwal, Sushant , Suri, Jasjit S. , Saba, Luca , Mavrogeni, Sophie , Kitas, George D. , Nicolaides, Andrew , Sharma, Aditya , Alizad, Azra , Gupta, Archna , Kalra, Mannudeep K.

Diagnostics | December 15, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2367

10.3390/diagnostics11122367 Get It

(1) Background: COVID-19 computed tomography (CT) lung segmentation is critical for COVID lung severity diagnosis. Earlier proposed approaches during 2020–2021 were semiautomated or automated but not accurate, user-friendly, and industry-standard benchmarked. The proposed study compared the COVID Lung Image Analysis System, COVLIAS 1.0 (GBTI, Inc., and AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA, USA, referred to as COVLIAS), against MedSeg, a web-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) segmentation tool, where COVLIAS uses hybrid deep learning (HDL) models for CT lung segmentation. (2) Materials and Methods: The proposed study used 5000 ITALIAN COVID-19 positive CT lung images collected from 72 patients (experimental data) that confirmed the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Two hybrid AI models from the COVLIAS system, namely, VGG-SegNet (HDL 1) and ResNet-SegNet (HDL 2), were used to segment the CT lungs. As part of the results, we compared both COVLIAS and MedSeg against two manual delineations (MD 1 and MD 2) using (i) Bland–Altman plots, (ii) Correlation coefficient (CC) plots, (iii) Receiver operating characteristic curve, and (iv) Figure of Merit and (v) visual overlays. A cohort of 500 CROATIA COVID-19 positive CT lung images (validation data) was used. A previously trained COVLIAS model was directly applied to the validation data (as part of Unseen-AI) to segment the CT lungs and compare them against MedSeg. (3) Result: For the experimental data, the four CCs between COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MD 1, COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MD 2, COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MD 1, and COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MD 2 were 0.96, 0.96, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively. The mean value of the COVLIAS system for the above four readings was 0.96. CC between MedSeg vs. MD 1 and MedSeg vs. MD 2 was 0.98 and 0.98, respectively. Both had a mean value of 0.98. On the validation data, the CC between COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MedSeg and COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MedSeg was 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. For the experimental data, the difference between the mean values for COVLIAS and MedSeg showed a difference of <2.5%, meeting the standard of equivalence. The average running times for COVLIAS and MedSeg on a single lung CT slice were ~4 s and ~10 s, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The performances of COVLIAS and MedSeg were similar. However, COVLIAS showed improved computing time over MedSeg.
Nutrition, atherosclerosis, arterial imaging, cardiovascular risk stratification, and manifestations in COVID-19 framework: a narrative review
Munjral, Smiksha , Ahluwalia, Puneet , Saba, Luca , Singh, Inder M. , Chadha, Paramjit S., Turk, Monika, Johri, Amer M. , Khanna, Narendra N. , Višković, Klaudija , Laird, John R , Pareek, Gyan , Miner, Martin , Sobel, David , Balestrieri, Antonella , Sfikakis, Petros P. , Tsoulfas, George, Protogerou, Athanasios, Misra, Prasanna, Agarwal, Vikas , Teji, Jagjit S. , Al-Maini, Mustafa , Dhanjil, Surinder, Sockalingam, Meyypan, Saxena, Ajit Kumar , Rathore, Vijay , Fatemi, Mostafa , Viswanathan, Vijay , Krishnan, Pudukode, Omerzu, Tomaž , Naidu, Subbaram, Suri, Jasjit S. , Fatemi, Mostafa , Agarwal, Vikas , Munjral, Smiksha , Jamthikar, Ankush D. , Puvvula, Anudeep , Faa, Gavino , Mavrogeni, Sophie , Protogerou, Athanasios, Kitas, George D. , Kolluri, Raghu , Sharma, Aditya , Alizad, Azra , Krishnan, Pudukode R., Nicolaides, Andrew , Suri, Jasjit S.

Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark | December 1, 2021 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.52586/5026 Get It

Background: Atherosclerosis is the primary cause of the cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several risk factors lead to atherosclerosis, and altered nutrition is one among those. Nutrition has been ignored quite often in the process of CVD risk assessment. Altered nutrition along with carotid ultrasound imaging-driven atherosclerotic plaque features can help in understanding and banishing the problems associated with the late diagnosis of CVD. Artificial intelligence (AI) is another promisingly adopted technology for CVD risk assessment and management. Therefore, we hypothesize that the risk of atherosclerotic CVD can be accurately monitored using carotid ultrasound imaging, predicted using AI-based algorithms, and reduced with the help of proper nutrition. Layout: The review presents a pathophysiological link between nutrition and atherosclerosis by gaining a deep insight into the processes involved at each stage of plaque development. After targeting the causes and finding out results by low-cost, user-friendly, ultrasound-based arterial imaging, it is important to (i) stratify the risks and (ii) monitor them by measuring plaque burden and computing risk score as part of the preventive framework. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based strategies are used to provide efficient CVD risk assessments. Finally, the review presents the role of AI for CVD risk assessment during COVID-19. Conclusions: By studying the mechanism of low-density lipoprotein formation, saturated and trans fat, and other dietary components that lead to plaque formation, we demonstrate the use of CVD risk assessment due to nutrition and atherosclerosis disease formation during normal and COVID times. Further, nutrition if included, as a part of the associated risk factors can benefit from atherosclerotic disease progression and its management using AI-based CVD risk assessment.
Inter-Variability Study of COVLIAS 1.0: Hybrid Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Lung Segmentation in Computed Tomography
Suri, Jasjit S. , Agarwal, Sushant , Elavarthi, Pranav, Ketireddy, Vedmanvitha, Columbu, Marta, Saba, Luca , Gupta, Suneet Kumar , Faa, Gavino , Singh, Inder M. , Turk, Monika, Chadha, Paramjit S., Johri, Amer M. , Khanna, Narendra N. , Višković, Klaudija , Laird, John R. , Pareek, Gyan , Miner, Martin , Sobel, David , Balestrieri, Antonella , Sfikakis, Petros P. , Tsoulfas, George, Protogerou, Athanase D. , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Agarwal, Vikas , Teji, Jagjit S. , Al-Maini, Mustafa , Dhanjil, Surinder, Rathore, Vijay , Fatemi, Mostafa , Krishnan, Pudukode, Nagy, F. , Naidu, Subbaram, Gupta, Suneet K , Faa, Gavino , Tsoulfas, George , Protogerou, Athanasios , Agarwal, Vikas , Fatemi, Mostafa , Alizad, Azra , Ferenc, Nagy , Naidu, Subbaram , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Agarwal, Sushant , Suri, Jasjit S. , Pathak, Rajesh, Saba, Luca , Mavrogeni, Sophie , Kitas, George D. , Nicolaides, Andrew , Sharma, Aditya , Alizad, Azra , Krishnan, Pudukode R., Ruzsa, Zoltán , Gupta, Archna , Kalra, Mannudeep K.

Diagnostics | November 1, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2025

10.3390/diagnostics11112025 Get It

Background: For COVID-19 lung severity, segmentation of lungs on computed tomography (CT) is the first crucial step. Current deep learning (DL)-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have a bias in the training stage of segmentation because only one set of ground truth (GT) annotations are evaluated. We propose a robust and stable inter-variability analysis of CT lung segmentation in COVID-19 to avoid the effect of bias. Methodology: The proposed inter-variability study consists of two GT tracers for lung segmentation on chest CT. Three AI models, PSP Net, VGG-SegNet, and ResNet-SegNet, were trained using GT annotations. We hypothesized that if AI models are trained on the GT tracings from multiple experience levels, and if the AI performance on the test data between these AI models is within the 5% range, one can consider such an AI model robust and unbiased. The K5 protocol (training to testing: 80%:20%) was adapted. Ten kinds of metrics were used for performance evaluation. Results: The database consisted of 5000 CT chest images from 72 COVID-19-infected patients. By computing the coefficient of correlations (CC) between the output of the two AI models trained corresponding to the two GT tracers, computing their differences in their CC, and repeating the process for all three AI-models, we show the differences as 0%, 0.51%, and 2.04% (all < 5%), thereby validating the hypothesis. The performance was comparable; however, it had the following order: ResNet-SegNet > PSP Net > VGG-SegNet. Conclusions: The AI models were clinically robust and stable during the inter-variability analysis on the CT lung segmentation on COVID-19 patients.
COVLIAS 1.0: Lung Segmentation in COVID-19 Computed Tomography Scans Using Hybrid Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Models
Suri, Jasjit S. , Agarwal, Sushant , Ketireddy, Vedmanvitha, Columbu, Marta, Saba, Luca , Gupta, Suneet Kumar , Singh, Inder M. , Turk, Monika, Chadha, Paramjit S., Johri, Amer M. , Khanna, Narendra N. , Višković, Klaudija , Laird, John R. , Pareek, Gyan , Miner, Martin , Sobel, David , Balestrieri, Antonella , Sfikakis, Petros P. , Tsoulfas, George, Protogerou, Athanase D. , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Agarwal, Vikas , Teji, Jagjit S. , Al-Maini, Mustafa , Dhanjil, Surinder, Nicolaides, Andrew , Rathore, Vijay , Fatemi, Mostafa , Krishnan, Pudukode R., Frence, Nagy, Naidu, Subbaram, Nagy, F. , Tsoulfas, George , Protogerou, Athanasios , Misra, Durga Prasanna , Agarwal, Vikas , Nicolaides, Andrew , Alizad, Azra , Fatemi, Mostafa , Ferenc, Nagy , Agarwal, Sushant , Suri, Jasjit S. , Pathak, Rajesh, Faa, Gavino , Mavrogeni, Sophie , Kitas, George D. , Sharma, Aditya , Alizad, Azra , Frence, Nagy, Ruzsa, Zoltán , Gupta, Archna , Kalra, Mannudeep K.

Diagnostics | August 4, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1405

10.3390/diagnostics11081405 Get It

Background: COVID-19 lung segmentation using Computed Tomography (CT) scans is important for the diagnosis of lung severity. The process of automated lung segmentation is challenging due to (a) CT radiation dosage and (b) ground-glass opacities caused by COVID-19. The lung segmentation methodologies proposed in 2020 were semi- or automated but not reliable, accurate, and user-friendly. The proposed study presents a COVID Lung Image Analysis System (COVLIAS 1.0, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA) consisting of hybrid deep learning (HDL) models for lung segmentation. Methodology: The COVLIAS 1.0 consists of three methods based on solo deep learning (SDL) or hybrid deep learning (HDL). SegNet is proposed in the SDL category while VGG-SegNet and ResNet-SegNet are designed under the HDL paradigm. The three proposed AI approaches were benchmarked against the National Institute of Health (NIH)-based conventional segmentation model using fuzzy-connectedness. A cross-validation protocol with a 40:60 ratio between training and testing was designed, with 10% validation data. The ground truth (GT) was manually traced by a radiologist trained personnel. For performance evaluation, nine different criteria were selected to perform the evaluation of SDL or HDL lung segmentation regions and lungs long axis against GT. Results: Using the database of 5000 chest CT images (from 72 patients), COVLIAS 1.0 yielded AUC of ~0.96, ~0.97, ~0.98, and ~0.96 (p-value < 0.001), respectively within 5% range of GT area, for SegNet, VGG-SegNet, ResNet-SegNet, and NIH. The mean Figure of Merit using four models (left and right lung) was above 94%. On benchmarking against the National Institute of Health (NIH) segmentation method, the proposed model demonstrated a 58% and 44% improvement in ResNet-SegNet, 52% and 36% improvement in VGG-SegNet for lung area, and lung long axis, respectively. The PE statistics performance was in the following order: ResNet-SegNet > VGG-SegNet > NIH > SegNet. The HDL runs in <1 s on test data per image. Conclusions: The COVLIAS 1.0 system can be applied in real-time for radiology-based clinical settings.