Ganne, Nandita

Background Acute otitis externa (AOE) is a common condition encountered in primary care. Evidence-based guidelines recommend topical antimicrobial therapy as first-line treatment for uncomplicated disease regardless of diabetes status. However, clinicians may escalate treatment in patients with diabetes because of concern for necrotizing otitis externa (NOE), a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. This study aimed to evaluate whether diabetes status influences systemic antibiotic use in uncomplicated acute otitis externa and to assess factors associated with treatment decisions. Methods A cross-sectional survey was distributed to primary care clinicians participating in a multi-state primary care practice-based research collaborative, comprising physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician associates within the specialties of family medicine, general pediatrics, and general internal medicine. The survey instrument asked clinicians what they would select as first-line treatment for uncomplicated AOE in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). It also assessed factors influencing management decisions as well as confidence in identifying NOE. The primary outcome was whether the clinician reported they would use systemic antibiotics for treatment of AOE, comparing treatment decisions using relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for antibiotic exposure given the presence of DM. Results Out of 257 invitations, 58 respondents completed the survey (22.6%). Systemic antibiotics were selected more frequently when DM was present (19.0%) compared with when DM was absent (5.2%), resulting in a significantly increased likelihood of reported systemic antibiotic use (RR = 3.67; 95% CI, 1.08–12.47; p = 0.043). Clinician confidence in identifying NOE varied, with most respondents reporting only slight or moderate confidence. Conclusions Primary care clinicians reported substantially higher use of systemic antibiotics when managing uncomplicated AOE in patients with DM, representing nearly a fourfold increase in antibiotic exposure despite guideline recommendations favoring topical therapy alone. These findings highlight practice variation which may be driven by concern for necrotizing otitis externa, underscoring opportunities to improve antibiotic stewardship and clinician confidence in risk stratification.

SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19, has caused a global pandemic resulting in over 4 million deaths globally (data current as of 14 July 2021). E-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) is a type of acute lung injury of unclear pathogenesis. The two pathologies present with overlapping clinical symptoms, laboratory values and imaging, making them difficult to distinguish, especially in the setting of a global COVID-19 pandemic. We present the case of a 32-year-old woman treated for COVID-19 despite multiple negative SARS CoV-2 PCR tests and nucleocapsid antibody test. On further investigation, she endorsed use of E-cigarettes and was subsequently diagnosed with EVALI. The patient was treated with oral and intravenous steroids, resulting in significant improvement in her symptoms. This case highlights the challenge of diagnosing rarer aetiologies of respiratory distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.