Back to Authors

Zumstein, Matthias A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5480-6008

Mayo Clinic

the Swiss Orthopaedics Shoulder Elbow and Expert Group

Citations 2

The role of platelet-rich plasma in shoulder pathologies: a critical review of the literature
Schär, Michael , Grezda, Kushtrim , _, _, _, _, Bouaicha, Samy , Buess, Eduard, Bühler, Martin, Cikes, Alec, Farron, Alain , Jost, Bernhard , Lädermann, Alexandre , Meyer, Philipp T. , Puskàs, Gàbor, Riand, N., Schneeberger, Alberto G. , Simmen, Beat R., Wieser, Karl , Wirth, Barbara , Lädermann, Alexandre , Lädermann, Alexandre , Rosso, Claudio , Morrey, Mark E. , _, _, _, _, Candrian, Christian , Cunningham, Grégory James , Flury, Matthias P. , Hoffmeyer, Pierre , Holzer, Nicolas , Müller, Andreas Marc , Zumstein, Matthias A.

EFORT Open Reviews | April 25, 2023 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 213-222

10.1530/eor-22-0104 Get It

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a revolutionary treatment that harnesses the regenerative power of the body's own platelets to promote healing and tissue regeneration. While PRP therapy has emerged as a promising option for augmenting biologic healing in the shoulder, the complexity of shoulder disorders makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of PRP across different conditions and stages of disease. Our comprehensive review of twenty-four studies highlights the current state of PRP therapy in shoulder pathologies, revealing a wide variety of number of patients, control groups and results. Despite these challenges, the regenerative potential of PRP therapy is moderate in some conditions, with numerous studies demonstrating the positive effects. In conclusion, the authors of this study recommend the use of PRP therapy for adhesive capsulitis and rotator cuff repair of medium to large tears. However, they do not recommend the use of PRP for subacromial impingement or rotator cuff tears. It is up to the clinician's discretion to decide whether PRP therapy is appropriate for individual cases. However, there is still insufficient evidence to support the inclusion of PRP therapy in treatment protocols for other shoulder disorders. Therefore, further research is needed to fully explore the potential of PRP therapy in the treatment of various shoulder conditions.
Nonoperative and Operative Soft‐Tissue, Cartilage, and Bony Regeneration and Orthopaedic Biologics of the Shoulder: An Orthoregeneration Network (ON) Foundation Review
Condron, Nolan B. , Kester, Benjamin S., Tokish, John M. , Zumstein, Matthias A. , Gobezie, Reuben, Scheibel, Markus , Cole, Brian J. , Scheibel, Markus Thomas

Arthroscopy | July 20, 2021 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 3200-3218

10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.033 Get It

Abstract Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopaedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electro‐magnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the shoulder including the rotator cuff tendons, glenohumeral articular cartilage, glenoid labrum, the joint capsule, and bone. Promising and established treatment modalities include hyaluronic acid (HA); platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) and platelet rich concentrates (PRC); bone marrow aspirate (BMA) comprising mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs alternatively termed medicinal signaling cells and frequently, misleadingly labelled “mesenchymal stem cells”); MSC harvested from adipose, umbilical, or placental sources; factors including vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor‐beta (TGFβ), bone morphogenic protein (BMP), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs); prolotherapy; pulsed electromagnetic field therapy; microfracture and other marrow‐stimulation techniques; biologic resurfacing using acellular dermal allografts, allograft Achilles tendons, allograft lateral menisci, fascia lata autografts, and porcine xenografts; osteochondral autograft or allograft); and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Studies involving hyaluronic acid, platelet rich plasma, and medicinal signaling cells of various origin tissues have shown mixed results to‐date as isolated treatments and as surgical adjuncts. Despite varied results thus far, there is great potential for improved efficacy with refinement of current techniques and translation of burgeoning preclinical work. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.