Back to Authors

Qi, Mia

Mayo Clinic

Janssen Research & Development (United States)

Citations 2

Prognostic value of minimal residual disease negativity in myeloma: combined analysis of POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA
Miguel, Jesús F. San , Usmani, Saad Z. , Paiva, Bruno , Plesner, Torben , Hungria, Vânia , Moreau, Philippe , Mateos, María‐Victoria , Perrot, Aurore , Iida, Shinsuke , Kumar, Shaji , Donk, Niels W.C.J. van de , Sonneveld, Pieter , Spencer, Andrew , Krevvata, Maria, Heuck, Christoph, Wang, Jianping , Ukropec, Jon, Kobos, Rachel, Sun, Steven , Qi, Mia, Munshi, Nikhil C. , San-Miguel, Jesus , Paiva, Bruno , Hungria, Vania , Mateos, María-Victoria , Perrot, Aurore , Iida, Shinsuke , Kumar, Shaji K , Moreau, Philippe , Usmani, Saad , Cavo, Michèle , Weisel, Katja C , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Avet‐Loiseau, Hervé , Bahlis, Nizar Jacques , Facon, Thierry T.F.

Blood | July 21, 2021 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 835-844

10.1182/blood.2021011101 Get It

Abstract We explored minimal residual disease (MRD) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and transplant-ineligible (TIE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) using data from 4 phase 3 studies (POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA). Each study previously demonstrated that daratumumab-based therapies improved MRD negativity rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by approximately half vs standards of care. We conducted a large-scale pooled analysis for associations between patients achieving complete response or better (≥CR) with MRD-negative status and progression-free survival (PFS). MRD was assessed via next-generation sequencing (10−5 sensitivity threshold). Patient-level data were pooled from all 4 studies and for patients with TIE NDMM and patients with RRMM who received ≤2 prior lines of therapy (≤2 PL). PFS was evaluated by response and MRD status. Median follow-up (months) was 54.8 for POLLUX, 50.2 for CASTOR, 40.1 for ALCYONE, and 36.4 for MAIA. Patients who achieved ≥CR and MRD negativity had improved PFS vs those who failed to reach CR or were MRD positive (TIE NDMM and RRMM hazard ratio [HR] 0.20, P < .0001; TIE NDMM and RRMM ≤2 PL HR 0.20, P < .0001). This benefit occurred irrespective of therapy or disease setting. A time-varying Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that ≥CR with MRD negativity was associated with improved PFS. Daratumumab-based treatment was associated with more patients reaching ≥CR and MRD negativity. These findings represent the first large-scale analysis with robust methodology to support ≥CR with MRD negativity as a prognostic factor for PFS in RRMM and TIE NDMM. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02076009, #NCT02136134, #NCT02195479, and #NCT02252172.
Sustained minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and the impact of daratumumab in MAIA and ALCYONE
Miguel, Jesús F. San , Paiva, Bruno , Kumar, Shaji , Mateos, María‐Victoria , Usmani, Saad Z. , Cook, Gordon , Cavo, Michèle , Quach, Hang , Ukropec, Jon, Ramaswami, Priya, Pei, Huiling , Qi, Mia, Sun, Steven , Wang, Jianping , Krevvata, Maria, DeAngelis, Nikki, Heuck, Christoph, Rampelbergh, Rian Van , Kudva, Anupa, Kobos, Rachel, Qi, Ming , San-Miguel, Jesus , Paiva, Bruno , Kumar, Shaji K , Mateos, María-Victoria , Quach, Hang , Cook, Gordon , Usmani, Saad , Avet‐Loiseau, Hervé , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Facon, Thierry T.F. , Touzeau, Cyrille , Jakubowiak, Andrzej , Bahlis, Nizar Jacques

Blood | July 16, 2021 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 492-501

10.1182/blood.2020010439 Get It

Abstract In patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), daratumumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 44% in MAIA (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone [D-Rd]) and 58% in ALCYONE (daratumumab/bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [D-VMP]). Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a sensitive measure of disease and response to therapy. MRD-negativity status and durability were assessed in MAIA and ALCYONE. MRD assessments using next-generation sequencing (10−5) occurred for patients achieving complete response (CR) or better and after at least CR at 12, 18, 24, and 30 months from the first dose. Progression-free survival (PFS) by MRD status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were analyzed in the intent-to-treat population and among patients achieving at least CR. In MAIA (D-Rd, n = 368; lenalidomide and dexamethasone [Rd], n = 369) and ALCYONE (D-VMP, n = 350; bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [VMP], n = 356), the median duration of follow-up was 36.4 and 40.1 months, respectively. MRD-negative status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were associated with improved PFS, regardless of treatment group. However, daratumumab-based therapy improved rates of MRD negativity lasting ≥6 months (D-Rd, 14.9% vs Rd, 4.3%; D-VMP, 15.7% vs VMP, 4.5%) and ≥12 months (D-Rd, 10.9% vs Rd, 2.4%; D-VMP, 14.0% vs VMP, 2.8%), both of which translated to improved PFS vs control groups. In a pooled analysis, patients who were MRD negative had improved PFS vs patients who were MRD positive. Patients with NDMM who achieved MRD-negative status or sustained MRD negativity had deep remission and improved clinical outcomes. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02252172 (MAIA) and #NCT02195479 (ALCYONE).