Tan, Winston

Amplification of androgen receptor (AR) is a common genomic event in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To evaluate the prognostic value of the amplifications of specific loci in the AR gene in cell-free DNA, we developed a multiplex digital PCR (dPCR) assay that targeted AR enhancer (AR-En), AR exon 1 (AR-E1), AR exon 8 (AR-E8) and OPHN1 (downstream of AR). We selected three relatively stable genes, C2orf16, FAM111B, and GRIA3, as reference controls for copy number normalization. One hundred and eight mCRPC patients were recruited to test the association of specific AR loci amplification with clinical outcome. Using a normalized ratio ≥ 1.92 as cutoff, amplification of AR-En, AR-E1, AR-E8 and OPHN1 was observed in 28, 25, 24 and 19 of 108 mCRPC patients, respectively. Among the 41 patients with AR region amplification, 9 (21.9%) showed amplification at all four selected regions and 15 (36.6%) showed amplification at AR-En, AR-E1, and AR-E8. Six (14.6%) patients showed independent AR-En amplification, while the remaining 3 (7.3%) demonstrated AR-E8 amplification only. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed overall survival’s association with the amplification of AR-En (p = 0.02, HR = 1.68 (1.07–2.65)), AR-E8 (p = 0.02, HR = 1.78 (1.08–2.92)) and AR-En-E8 (the combination of AR-En and AR-E8 (p = 0.009, HR = 1.77 (1.15–2.73)). Multivariate models that included AR-En-E8 amplification and clinical factors significantly improved prognostic performance (p = 0.0001). With further validation, the multiplex dPCR assay may assist in prognostication of mCRPC patients.

5565 Background: mCRPC patients (pts) tend to have a poor prognosis and limited treatment (tx) options, especially those with concomitant bone metastases (mets). We explored the ability of combination tx with atezo (anti–PD-L1) and r-223 (α-particle emitter) to stimulate anti-tumor immunity in mCRPC pts. Methods: This Phase Ib study evaluated the safety and tolerability of atezo + r-223 in pts with mCRPC and multiple bone mets, visceral mets and/or lymphadenopathy who progressed after androgen pathway inhibitor tx. The initial cohort phase evaluated the safety and tolerability of a concurrent dosing schedule (CDS), in which atezo and r-223 were administered on the same day. Following assessment of CDS, pts were randomized 1:1:1 to CDS or 1 of 2 staggered dosing schedules (atezo or r-223 introduced a full cycle before the other). This was followed by an expansion of enrollment (randomized 1:1:1). Pts got atezo 840 mg IV q2w and r-223 at 55 kBq/kg IV 6 times at 4-wk intervals until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit. Exploratory measures of efficacy included investigator-assessed ORR (RECIST 1.1), PSA response rate, time to PSA progression, radiographic PFS (rPFS; PCWG2 criteria) and OS. Biopsy samples were collected at baseline and prior to cycle 2 to evaluate changes in the tumor microenvironment during tx. Results: As of Oct 4, 2019, 45 pts were enrolled and 44 had evaluable data. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across groups. All 44 evaluable pts had ≥ 1 all-cause AE; 23 (52.3%) had Gr 3-4 AE. Eight pts (18.2%) had Gr 5 AE as per protocol reporting of deaths; 4 (9.1%) were from disease progression. Median follow-up was 13.9 mo (range, 1.7–34.2). Confirmed ORR was 6.8% (95% CI: 1.43, 18.66). Confirmed PSA response rate was 4.5% and median time to PSA progression was 3.0 mo (95% CI: 2.8, 3.3). Median rPFS was 3.0 mo (95% CI: 2.8, 4.6) and median OS was 16.3 mo (95% CI: 10.9, 22.3). Changes in PD-L1 and CD8 IHC were consistent with the known mechanism of action of atezo, as were changes in alkaline phosphatase with radium. Conclusions: No dose-limiting toxicities, safety signals, or changes in serum biomarkers were observed beyond the known safety profiles of atezo and r-223. This Phase 1b study did not seem to show clinical benefit from combination tx. Ongoing subgroup and biomarker analyses may provide additional insights. Studies of PD-1/PD-L1 targeted therapies in combination with tumor-directed radiation in molecularly selected mCRPC pts are planned or underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02814669 .

e13002 Background: Despite improvement in survival in breast cancer patients from advanced therapies, rates of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity manifesting as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have offset some of these benefits in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab. Results suggesting clinical biomarkers predict cardiotoxicity are inconsistent. Recently, expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATR1) and endothelin 1 (ET1) has shown to play a role in breast tumor growth. We sought to evaluate whether the presence of ATR1 and ET1 in breast cancer tissue using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and qRT-PCR can predict chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Methods: We hypothesized that elevated expression of ATR1 and ET1 in tumor tissue is associated with chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity (LVEF < 50%) compared to tissue from controls. Preliminarily, 34 paraffin-embedded breast tissue specimens from women with breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab were retrieved for analysis. IHC and qRT-PCR for expression of ATR1 and ET1 was performed on all specimens. Results: We found that ET1 expression was significantly increased in patients with an LVEF < 50%. In addition, we noted the lower the LVEF, the higher the ET1 expression (p = 0.03). We also found patients with a change in LVEF of greater than 10% had more ET1 expression compared to those without a change in LVEF (p = 0.05). We did not find a significant relationship between ATR1 and LVEF. Conclusions: Increased ET1 expression in breast tumor tissue may predict cardiotoxicity. Our findings may aid in future research using novel biomarkers to predict breast cancer patients at risk for developing chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. In addition, targeted therapies to these biomarkers may potentially help prevent the development of cardiotoxicity.

PURPOSE To provide evidence-based guidance on the clinical management of cancer cachexia in adult patients with advanced cancer. METHODS A systematic review of the literature collected evidence regarding nutritional, pharmacologic, and other interventions, such as exercise, for cancer cachexia. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs published from 1966 through October 17, 2019. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS The review included 20 systematic reviews and 13 additional RCTs. Dietary counseling, with or without oral nutritional supplements, was reported to increase body weight in some trials, but evidence remains limited. Pharmacologic interventions associated with improvements in appetite and/or body weight include progesterone analogs and corticosteroids. The other evaluated interventions either had no benefit or insufficient evidence of benefit to draw conclusions on efficacy. Limitations of the evidence include high drop-out rates, consistent with advanced cancer, as well as variability across studies in outcomes of interest and methods for outcome assessment. RECOMMENDATIONS Dietary counseling may be offered with the goals of providing patients and caregivers with advice for the management of cachexia. Enteral feeding tubes and parenteral nutrition should not be used routinely. In the absence of more robust evidence, no specific pharmacological intervention can be recommended as the standard of care; therefore, clinicians may choose not to prescribe medications specifically for the treatment of cancer cachexia. Nonetheless, when it is decided to trial a drug to improve appetite and/or improve weight gain, currently available pharmacologic interventions that may be used include progesterone analogs and short-term (weeks) corticosteroids.

18585 Background: The Quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial needs of the 30–40% of prostate cancer patients who experience biochemical recurrence are not known. The impact of having a rising PSA, anticipation of undergoing PSA testing, and living with prostate cancer may increase psychological distress and decrease QOL. Aim: to evaluate the psychosocial treatment needs of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (br-PCa) and to develop a treatment to address these needs. Methods: 28 men with br-PCa, 58–87 years, were enrolled. A qualitative research approach was used, consisting of six, 2 hour, semi-structured, focus groups containing 4–6 men per group. Data were content coded and grouped into categories following the structure of the focus group guide. The major conceptual themes were then summarized by 2 independent reviewers. Discrepancies were discussed with a third researcher until a consensus was reached. These results were used to guide development of a multi-disciplinary quality of life intervention. Results: Participants defined QOL as the ability to stay active both physically and mentally without limitation in the performance of usual activities. There was a consensus that prostate cancer led to substantial anxiety related to PSA testing, treatment side effects, and fear of recurrence. Participants were enthusiastic about receiving adjuvant multidisciplinary treatment for prostate cancer focusing on anxiety management, nutrition, exercise, management of treatment side effects, and medical education. Participants desired a male group leader and feedback was mixed regarding whether spouses should be involved. Conclusions: Men with br-PCa report experiencing substantial anxiety and were enthusiastic about receiving a structured intervention to these needs. Based on our findings an intervention has been developed and is currently being compared to usual care. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

5082 Background: We evaluated the association of germ-line variation in 10 candidate genes important in prostate cancer biology (NKX3-1, JAK2, SLCO2B1, STAT3, CYP19A1, HSD17B4, TRMT11, PRMT3, HSD17B12, NCOA4) with failure of AA in advanced prostate cancer patients. Methods: Patients (N=619) were enrolled for genotyping at the time of AA failure. Candidate genes were selected from the literature and previous pilot studies in smaller cohorts which had identified variation in TRMT11 and HSD17B12 to be associated with AA failure. Genes were tagged using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from HapMap with minor allele frequency of >5% and r2≥0.8. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and genotyped using Illumina Veracode platform. The primary endpoint was time to failure on AA, defined as time from initiating continuous AA to two serial PSA increases over the nadir or clinical or imaging based progression, whichever came first. Principal component analysis was used for gene-levels tests. Association with the primary endpoint was assessed using proportional hazards regression models at the gene-level and at the SNP level. For SNP level results we estimated per allele (ordinal model) hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Cox regression, adjusted for Gleason score (GS). Results: We successfully genotyped 60 SNPs (from 10 genes) in 519 subjects. The median age of the cohort was 71 years (range 43, 92). The GS distribution was 51% subjects with GS≥8; 33% with GS=7 and 17% with GS<7. Median time to AA failure for the cohort was 2.3 years (IQ range: 1.0-4.5). In gene level analyses adjusting for GS, TRMT11 (p=0.004), HSD17B12 (p=0.016), and JAK2 (p=0.044) genes were associated with time to AA failure. Four of the 18 genotyped SNPs in JAK2 were associated with AA failure after adjustment for GS (Table). Conclusions: Variation in the JAK2 gene is significantly associated with time to AA failure. Validation is needed to develop these as predictive biomarkers for AA in advanced prostate cancer. [Table: see text]

e13501 Background: Loss of estrogen receptor alpha gene expression has been associated with insensitivity to endocrine therapy in human breast cancer patients. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have recently been found to restore sensitivity to the estrogen receptor by modulation of the estrogen and progesterone receptors. This had been shown with both aromatase and tamoxifen refractory and in triple negative cell lines . We performed a Phase I study of the combination of LBH589 (panobinostat) and letrozole to evaluate safety and tolerability in patients with metastatic breast cancer prior to the performance of a phase II trial. Methods: We enrolled postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, ECOG PS 0 or 1, ANC>1500/mm3, platelets>100,000/mm3, normal total bilirubin, and ALT/AST adequate laboratory tests were eligible. Letrozole dose was 2.5 mg/day orally. Dose of LBH589: Level 1, 20 mg orally three times weekly; Level 2, 30 mg orally three times a week. Results: 12 patients (dose level 1:6 patients, dose level 2: 6 patients) have been enrolled. 43 cycles of treatment have been given to these12 patients. Initial cohort of 3 patients at the 20 mg dose level had no dose limiting toxicity (DLT). At the 30 mg dose level 3/6 patients had DLT (thrombocytopenia grade 1: 2 pts; grade 3:1 pt; grade 4: 1 pt; and diarrhea grade 3: 1 pt. One pt at the 30 mg dose level has a confirmed partial response and remains on study after 6 cycles of treatment. Subsequent cohort of 3 patients had 1 dose DLT with doubling of the creatinine. The main DLT was thrombocytopenia in 3/6 pts at the 30 mg dose level. Conclusions: The recommended dose for phase II testing of LBH589 is 20 mg orally 3 times per week in combination with standard dose letrozole.

522 Background: In the adjuvant setting, patients with HER2 breast cancer treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy have superior survival compared to patients treated with chemotherapy alone. We previously showed that trastuzumab and chemotherapy induces HER2-specific antibodies which correlate with response to therapy in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. It remained unclear from those studies, however, whether the HER2-specific immunity played a role and if antibody immunity was associated with improved disease free survival in the adjuvant setting. In the present study, we addressed these questions by analyzing sera samples from a subset of patients enrolled in the NCCTG adjuvant trial, N9831, which includes an arm (Arm A) in which trastuzumab was not used. Arms B and C received trastuzumab sequentially or concurrently to chemotherapy, respectively. Methods: Pre-and post-treatment initiation sera were obtained from 50 women enrolled in N9831 (22 Arm A; 14 Arm B, and 14 Arm C). Lambda IgG antibodies (to avoid detection of trastuzumab) to HER2 were measured and presented as an index (>0.2 was considered a positive response). Results: Prior to therapy, across all three arms, N9831 patients had similar mean HER2 IgG levels (0.19 units in Arm A, 0.14 in Arm B, and 0.23 in Arm C, P=0.85). Following treatment, the mean levels of antibodies increased in Arm B to 0.35 units and in Arm C to 0.56 units and were higher (p<0.001) than in Arm A where levels did not increase. The proportion of patients who demonstrated antibody immunity increased by 9% in Arm A, 50% in Arm B and 28% in Arm C (P=0.026). Although the event rate was low in this cohort, Cox modeling suggested that larger increases in antibodies were associated with improved disease free survival (HR=0.23; p=0.04). Conclusions: These results show that the increased antibody immunity observed in adjuvant patients treated with combination trastuzumab and chemotherapy is clinically significant and results from the inclusion of trastuzumab. The findings may have important implications for improving treatment outcomes in patients treated with trastuzumab.

521 Background: The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy improves responses to therapy and extends survival among patients with metastatic HER2 breast cancer. Several mechanisms have been proposed for the activity of this combination therapy. Trastuzumab, specifically, is thought to activate NK cells and blunt HER2 signaling. Prior work from us has shown that combination trastuzumab and chemotherapy induces HER2-specific antibodies which correlate with response to therapy. Despite that, it remains unclear whether the immunity that was induced was due to complexing of non-tumor derived HER2 or antigen derived from the tumor site. In the present work, we addressed this question by assessing if combination therapy induced epitope spreading to tumor antigens other than HER2. Methods: Pre-and post-treatment sera were obtained from 56 women enrolled in 2 NCCTG clinical trials, N0337 and 98-32-52. IgG antibodies to HER2 intracellular domain (HER2), p53, IGFBP2, CEA and tetanus toxoid (TT) were examined using ELISAs. Sera from an age-matched group (N=56) of controls and 12 patients treated in the adjuvant setting were also examined. Results: Prior to therapy, metastatic patients had higher IgG levels (≥ 2-fold) to p53 and HER2 but not CEA, IGFBP2 and TT, relative to the controls. Similarly, adjuvant patients had elevated IgGs to multiple tumor antigens prior to therapy, relative to controls. Following therapy, levels of IgG to IGFBP2, HER2, and p53 increased in 81% of metastatic patients, with mean increases of 3.2 (±0.6 sem), 6.2 (±2.7) and 2.7 (±0.7) fold, respectively (p<0.05). Levels of antibodies to TT and CEA were not elevated by treatment. In contrast, IgGs were not increased in adjuvant patients; consistent with the idea that immunity depends on the presence of threshold levels of antigens. Conclusions: These results show that combination treatment induces adaptive immunity to antigens released by tumor and that metastatic patients remain capable of responding immunologically to their cancer. Thus, in metastatic breast cancer patients, combination trastuzumab and chemotherapy may behave as a vaccine.

15592 Background: Androgen deprivation (AD) is a common treatment option for asymptomatic patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Side effects such as sexual dysfunction, hot flashes, fatigue and gynecosmastia have been well documented. However, some of the side effects such as osteoporosis, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and anemia have only been recently recognized. The effects of AD on memory are not known. Aim: To determine if there is a decline in cognitive function(CF) in patients on AD using the modified MiniMental Status examination (MMSE). This test was chosen because it was simple, easy to administer and reproducible. Methods: We prospectively enrolled men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer prior to initiation of AD and monitored their MMSE at baseline, 2 ,and 4 months and while on AD (Mayo Clinic Jacksonville 8/2004- 9/2006). Results: 38 men were enrolled,however, only 20 men had at least 3 MMSE testing done. (5 withdrew consent, 13 had missing MMSE or lost to followup). The mean age was 68 years, mean baseline MMSE score was 27 and none had a clinical diagnosis of dementia or depression. Comparing the first MMSE and the 2nd MMSE score 19/20 patients had no decline of CF except for one patient who had a transient decline of 5 points in his MMSE score during a period of depression ,however, he had subsequent recovery of his score back to his normal baseline 27. Comparing the first and third MMSE score 20/20 patients had no decline of CF. The mean score change in MMSE score was -1 in 3 patients, 0 in 9 patients, +1 in 4 patients, +2 in 2 patients and +3 in 2 patients. There was no decline of 3 or more points in the mean score in any patient. Interestingly, 2 patients had an 3 point improvement of their MMSE score. We felt that it was secondary to being more familiar to the test process and not due to AD. Conclusions: There is no significant decline in MMSE score in men on AD at 2 and 4 months. MMSE might not be able to detect subtle changes in memory therefore, further study with more sensitive test to discriminate CF decline would be warranted and with longer followup cognitive impairement may be more evident. No significant financial relationships to disclose.