Maher, Steven A.

Introduction: Emergency departments (ED) are rapidly replacing conventional troponin assays with high-sensitivity troponin tests. We sought to evaluate emergency physician utilization of troponin tests before and after high-sensitivity troponin introduction in our ED. Methods: We retrospectively examined 9,477 ED encounters, identifying the percentage in which physicians ordered a serum troponin both before and after our institution adopted a high-sensitivity troponin test. Results: After introduction of high-sensitivity troponin testing, the percentage of ED encountersin which physicians ordered troponin studies decreased (28.3% before vs 22% after; P <.001),with the drop most pronounced in admitted patients (decrease of 10.9% [95% confidenceinterval [CI]: 7.3%- 14.5%] in admitted patients vs decrease of 3.6% [95% CI: 1.7%- 5.4%]in discharged patients; P<.001) Conclusion: Introduction of high-sensitivity troponin testing was associated with a decrease in troponin ordering. While the reasons for this are unclear, it is possible that physicians became more selective in their ordering behavior because of the lower specificity of high-sensitivity troponin.

Background: Extended care facilities (ECFs) house unique patient populations with increased risk of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and with unique, generally medically trained first responders initiating care prior to arrival of emergency medical services (EMS). However, little is known about bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and resuscitation outcomes in this population. Our aim is to assess rate of CPR delivery prior to EMS arrival in cases of OHCA among residents ECFs across the state of Arizona. Methods: Cases of OHCA between 2016-2018, cared for by participating Arizona EMS agencies, were included if OHCA occurred at an ECF, age 18+, and was of presumed cardiac etiology. Association between survival status at discharge and bystander CPR was examined first by Chi-squared test then by logistic regression, which adjusted for important risk factors and potential confounders including: age, gender, witnessed arrest, shockable initial rhythm, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in EMS care. Results: There were 1,046 cases included in this study after excluding 32 cases with DNR and 11 with unknown bystander CPR status. Median patient age was 74 (interquartile range 64, 83). The overall rate of CPR prior to EMS arrival was 78.4% (95% CI, 75.8%, 80.9%). Survival to hospital discharge and survival with favorable neurologic outcome were not different between nursing home patients who received CPR prior to EMS arrival and those who did not [6.2% vs. 4.4% (p = 0.34) and 3.1% vs. 1.8% (p = 0.29)]. There was no statistically significant difference in the adjusted analysis. Conclusions: In this study population CPR was commonly delivered prior to EMS arrival. However, delivery of CPR prior to EMS arrival was not associated with survival to hospital discharge or favorable neurologic outcome. The lack of positive association between CPR prior to arrival and survival to hospital discharge may be related to comorbid factors present in ECF patients or differences in the time between collapse and initiation of CPR. Further study is needed to identify factors that might improve survival in this unique population.