Lehto, Lauri J.

Spinal cord epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has been successfully employed to treat chronic pain and to restore lost functions after spinal cord injury. Yet, the efficacy of this approach is largely challenged by the suboptimal spatial distribution of the electrode contacts across anatomical targets, limiting the spatial selectivity of stimulation. In this study, we exploited different ESS paradigms, designed as either Spatial-Selective Stimulation (SSES) or Orientation-Selective Epidural Stimulation (OSES), and compared them to Conventional Monopolar Epidural Stimulation (CMES). SSES, OSES, and CMES were delivered with a 3- or 4-contact electrode array. Amplitudes and latencies of the Spinally Evoked Motor Potentials (SEMPs) were evaluated with different EES modalities. The results demonstrate that the amplitudes of SEMPs in hindlimb muscles depend on the orientation of the electrical field and vary between stimulation modalities. These findings show that the electric field applied with SSES or OSES provides more selective control of amplitudes of the SEMPs as compared to CMES. We demonstrate that spinal cord epidural stimulation applied with SSES or OSES paradigms in the rodent model could be tailored to the functional spinal cord neuroanatomy and can be tuned to specific target fibers and their orientation, optimizing the effect of neuromodulation.

PurposeElectrical epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used as a treatment for chronic pain as well as to partially restore motor function after a spinal cord injury. Monitoring the spinal cord activity during SCS with fMRI could provide important and objective measures of integrative responses to treatment. Unfortunately, spinal cord fMRI is severely challenged by motion and susceptibility artifacts induced by the implanted electrode and bones. This pilot study introduces multi‐band sweep imaging with Fourier transformation (MB‐SWIFT) technique for spinal cord fMRI during SCS in rats. Given the close to zero acquisition delay and high bandwidth in 3 dimensions, MB‐SWIFT is demonstrated to be highly tolerant to motion and susceptibility‐induced artifacts and thus holds promise for fMRI during SCS.MethodsMB‐SWIFT with 0.78 × 0.78 × 1.50 mm3 spatial resolution and 3‐s temporal resolution was used at 9.4 Tesla in rats undergoing epidural SCS at different frequencies. Its performance was compared with spin echo EPI. The origin of the functional contrast was also explored using suppression bands.ResultsMB‐SWIFT was tolerant to electrode‐induced artifacts and respiratory motion, leading to substantially higher fMRI sensitivity than spin echo fMRI. Clear stimulation frequency‐dependent responses to SCS were detected in the rat spinal cord close to the stimulation site. The origin of MB‐SWIFT fMRI signals was consistent with dominant inflow effects.ConclusionfMRI of the rat spinal cord during SCS can be consistently achieved with MB‐SWIFT, thus providing a valuable experimental framework for assessing the effects of SCS on the central nervous system.