Longer Duration of Treatment and Maintenance of Best Response with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Prolongs Overall Survival in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for about 20% of deaths from hematological cancers and remains incurable despite conventional and high-dose chemotherapy. Two phase III trials in patients with relapsed or refractory MM (MM-009 and MM-010) showed that lenalidomide combined with dexamethasone resulted in significantly improved response rates and significantly prolonged median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) compared with dexamethasone alone. This current sub-analysis of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone therapy assessed whether there was a survival benefit in maintaining patients on therapy after achieving their best response and what the impact of early discontinuation on TTP and OS was. Methods: Of the 353 patients from MM-009 and MM-010 treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone, 32 did not respond. Of the remaining 321 responding patients, 214 had a partial response (PR) or better and 107 patients had stable disease (SD). In this post-hoc sub-analysis, we first assessed the outcome of continuing treatment for ≤10 months vs. >10 months in all 321 patients who achieved SD or better, after they achieved their best response. In this landmark analysis, OS was measured from the time of achieving best response to death from any cause or to last contact. In a second analysis, we assessed the impact of early discontinuation due to adverse events or withdrawn consent on OS and TTP in all patients who achieved SD or better. Therefore, we excluded patients who discontinued treatment due to disease progression, death, or lack of efficacy. Patients who achieved SD or better and who continued on therapy were compared with those who discontinued. OS and TTP were assessed from time of randomization. Results: In the landmark analysis, of the 321 responding patients (≥PR, n=214; SD, n=107), 223 patients received treatment for ≤10 months after achieving their best response and 98 patients for >10 months after achieving their best response. Patients who continued therapy for >10 months after achieving their first best response had significantly longer OS vs. those who received therapy for ≤10 months (not reached vs. 23.4 months; p<0.0001). At 24 months after achieving their best response, significantly more patients were alive if they continued therapy >10 months vs. ≤10 months (93.8% vs. 48.4%, p<0.0001). In the second analysis, in order to evaluate the impact of discontinuation in patients achieving SD or better, we excluded 134 patients due to disease progression, death, or lack of efficacy. Of the remaining 187 responding patients, 72 discontinued treatment for AE (n=42) or withdrew consent (n=30), while the remaining 115 patients continued treatment. Median OS and TTP were significantly longer for patients who continued vs. those who discontinued treatment (median OS: not reached vs. 29.5 months, p<0.0001; median TTP: not reached vs. 13.6 months, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In patients achieving SD or better, prolonged duration of treatment was associated with significantly longer OS and TTP. In contrast, early discontinuation of treatment led to reduced OS and TTP. Therefore, efforts should be made to manage adverse events while maintaining patients on therapy. Furthermore, maintaining treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone after achieving the optimal response ensures a significant improvement in OS for patients with relapsed or refractory MM.
Inhibition of Spleen Tyrosine Kinase with Fostamatinib Shows Pre-Clinical Activity Against Models of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Abstract Abstract 3723 Background: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), a lymphoproliferative disorder with marrow infiltration by lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma cells and production of monoclonal IgM, is characterized clinically by good initial responses to standard therapeutic approaches. However, a minority of patients achieve a complete remission, and most inevitably relapse, indicating a need for validation of new, targeted therapies. Notably, B-cell receptor signaling has been linked to clonal evolution in WM, and Spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) is over-expressed in primary patient cells. Also, a recent phase I/II study of the Syk inhibitor fostamatinib in patients with a variety of non-Hodgkin lymphomas showed evidence of activity in three patients with WM. These findings supported our central hypothesis, which proposed that Syk could be a rational new target for therapy of WM, which we pursued first with pre-clinical studies. Methods: Studies of fostamatinib were performed using the WM cell line MWCL-1, and the IgM-producing cell line BWCM.1, as well as in primary cells from patients with WM, and in a novel murine xenograft model utilizing MWCL-1 cells. Results: Fostamatinib induced a time- and dose-dependent reduction in viability of MWCL-1 and BWCM.1 cells, with median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) that were in the physiologically relevant range of approximately 0.25 and 1 μM, respectively, at 3 days. Cell cycle analysis showed a decrease in cells at S-phase and at G2/M, while an increase was seen in cells in G1, and in the sub-G1fraction, suggesting induction of apoptosis. Consistent with the possibility that there was activation of type I programmed cell death, increased staining was seen in fostamatinb-treated cells with an antibody to Annexin V. Interestingly, evidence was seen of the induction of type II programmed cell death, or autophagy, as measured by an increase in cells staining with the lysotropic dye acridine orange. At the molecular level, fostamatinib blocked signaling through p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), MAPK kinase (MEK), protein kinase B/Akt, and Zeta-chain-associated protein kinase (ZAP)-70/Syk, as judged by a reduction in the phosphorylated forms of these intermediates by Western blotting. Notably, the viability of primary cells isolated from patients with WM was also reduced in association with blockade of p44/42 MAPK. Finally, a novel murine xenograft model was generated by injection of MWCL-1 cells into immunodeficient mice, which developed measurable tumors. When these were treated with fostamatinib, a delay in tumor growth was demonstrable. Conclusions: Targeting Syk with fostamatinib is an attractive strategy against pre-clinical models of WM both in vitro and in vivo. These findings lend further support for translation of fostamatinib to the clinic for patients with relapsed, and possibly even newly diagnosed WM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Targeting the Spleen Tyrosine Kinase with Fostamatinib as a Strategy against Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is more effective than dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of prior thalidomide exposure
Abstract This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with thalidomide. Of 704 patients, 39% were thalidomide exposed. Thalidomide-exposed patients had more prior lines of therapy and longer duration of myeloma than thalidomide-naive patients. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone led to higher overall response rate (ORR), longer time to progression (TTP), and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + dexamethasone despite prior thalidomide exposure. Among lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients, ORR was higher in thalidomide-naive versus thalidomide-exposed patients (P = .04), with longer median TTP (P = .04) and PFS (P = .02). Likewise for dexamethasone alone-treated patients (P = .03 for ORR, P = .03 for TTP, P = .06 for PFS). Prior thalidomide did not affect survival in lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients (36.1 vs 33.3 months, P > .05). Thalidomide-naive and thalidomide-exposed patients had similar toxicities. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone resulted in higher rates of venous thromboembolism, myelosuppression, and infections versus placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Lenalido-mide + dexamethasone was superior to placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Although prior thalidomide may have contributed to inferior TTP and PFS compared with thalidomide-naive patients, these parameters remained superior compared with placebo + dexamethasone; similar benefits compared with placebo + dexamethasone were not evident for thalidomide-exposed patients in terms of overall survival. Studies were registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00056160 and NCT00424047.