Back to Authors

Hou, Peijie

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4899-7391

Mayo Clinic

Regeneron (United States)

Citations 1

Garetosmab Reduces Flare-ups in Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
McGinniss, Jennifer, Mellis, Scott , Sanchez, Robert J., Rocco, Maja Di , Roux, Christian , Kolta, S., Bubbear, Judith , Cheung, Angela M. , Botman, Esmée , Mukaddam, Mona Al , Tile, Lianne, Portal‐Celhay, Cynthia, Sarkar, Neena, Hou, Peijie , Forleo‐Neto, Eduardo , Rankin, A. J., Trotter, Dinko González , Pignolo, Robert J. , Cheung, Angela M , Dahir, Kathryn , Keen, Richard , Orcel, Philippe , Funck‐Brentano, Thomas , Madeo, Annalisa , Tabarkiewicz, Jacek , Szczepanek, Małgorzata, Bachiller‐Corral, Javier , Economides, Aris N. , Eekhoff, Elisabeth M. W. , Kaplan, Frederick S.

Journal of the Endocrine Society | May 3, 2021 | Volume: 5 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: A251-A252

10.1210/jendso/bvab048.512 Get It

Abstract Background: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare, autosomal dominant disorder driven by mutations in ACVR1 that render it responsive to Activin A. FOP is characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification (HO) and distressing inflammatory events called “flare-ups.” Flare-ups can precede new HO; however, limited prospective data exists on this phenomenon. Garetosmab (GAR), an investigational human monoclonal antibody against Activin A, blocks formation of new HO in FOP. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of LUMINA-1 (NCT03188666) a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of GAR (10 mg/kg/week IV) versus placebo (PBO) in adult patients with FOP over 28 weeks. Patient-reported flare-ups were collected via a patient diary and severity level was reported as mild, moderate or severe. Clinician-reported flare-ups were collected as adverse events in the trial. HO lesions were imaged by 18F-NaF positron emission tomography (PET) and whole-body low-dose X-ray computed tomography (CT). Results: There was a two-fold higher proportion of patients who reported one or more flare-ups on PBO 17/24 (71%) compared with GAR 7/20 (35%). Clinicians reported a four-fold higher proportion of patients experiencing one or more flare-ups on PBO 10/24 (42%) compared with GAR 2/20 (10%). Overall rates of flare-up events were two-fold higher on PBO vs. GAR (1.4 vs. 0.65 events/patient/28 weeks) for patient-reported events and eight-fold higher on PBO vs. GAR by clinician report (0.83 vs. 0.10 events/patient/28 weeks). Most flare-ups occurred on the extremities and back; pain was the most commonly reported symptom. Patient-reported flare-ups on PBO were more frequently reported as severe (29.4%) compared with GAR (7.7%). Among subjects with at least 12 weeks of follow-up from start of patient-reported flare-up, development of new HO near the site was 5/27 (18.5%) on PBO and (0%) on GAR. Of all new HO lesions, 41% on PBO and 0% on GAR occurred with spatial and temporal relation to flare-up. Conclusions: Approximately two-thirds of patients on PBO reported flare-ups over 28 weeks. GAR was associated with reductions in frequency and severity of flare-ups. Fewer than 20% of patient-reported flare-ups were associated with new HO, indicating frequent discordance of these phenomena, and compatible with previous reports. GAR’s ability to reduce patient- and clinician-reported flare-ups, as well as new HO lesions may provide an important therapeutic option.