Arment, Courtney A.

Abstract Background Sarcoidosis is a disease characterized by non-caseating granulomas and may affect any organ system. Cardiac involvement may lead to conduction abnormalities, heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmias. As sarcoidosis may present with heterogeneous manifestations, a detailed past medical history may provide clues that help guide further workup. We present a rare case of a patient with undiagnosed oral sarcoidosis who subsequently experienced cardiac arrest from cardiac involvement. Case summary A 43-year-old male with a history of palpitations and periodontitis consistent with oral sarcoidosis presents after experiencing sudden cardiac arrest. He was subsequently diagnosed with cardiac and pulmonary sarcoidosis. With contemporary management (both immunosuppression and antiarrhythmics), he has not experienced any recurrent arrhythmias. Discussion In the setting of cardiac arrest and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, a careful clinical history and targeted cardiac testing may help clinicians determine when to consider cardiac sarcoidosis as a diagnosis. While oral sarcoidosis is a very rare condition, this case highlights how infrequent manifestations of sarcoidosis may be encountered in the clinical setting.

Introduction: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a non-ischemic disease which can present with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, but there is a paucity of research describing RV function and natural history in CS. Methods: We queried a registry of 512 CS patients for those with baseline and follow-up echocardiography (TTE). Demographics, medications, and baseline/follow-up TTE data were collected. RV-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling was approximated by ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE:ePASP). Results: Our query yielded 343 CS patients with mean age 56y (σ=12y), who were predominantly male (67%) and white (90%) with a median follow-up 4y (interquartile range 4.1y). Most had pulmonary sarcoidosis (68%). Baseline TTE data showed left ventricular ejection fraction 48% (σ=14), abnormal RV function with RV systolic pressure (ePASP) 34 mmHg (σ=11), TAPSE 21mm (σ=5), RV S′ 0.14 m/s (σ=0.07), and RV-PA uncoupling (TAPSE:ePASP 0.69 mm/mm Hg, σ=0.25). Baseline RV function parameters did not differ by pulmonary involvement of sarcoidosis. 92% received immunosuppression and 65% received neurohormonal blockade. In long-term follow-up, the overall cohort demonstrated a trend towards worsening of both RV S’ and RV-PA coupling (P=.02 and P=.003 for linear trend, respectively) but stable ePASP (P=.11). Trends in both non-invasive ePASP and RV-PA coupling were similar in patients with and without pulmonary involvement (P=.48 and P=.79, respectively). Conclusions: In our large CS cohort with extensive follow-up, metrics of RV function and RV-PA coupling are often abnormal at CS diagnosis. Echocardiographic measures of PASP tend to remain stable but markers of RV dysfunction, including RV-PA coupling, tend to worsen throughout the disease course irrespective of pulmonary sarcoidosis. More granular phenotyping of pulmonary hypertension in CS is required to better understand this relationship.