Back to Authors

Mathew, Verghese

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 36

Balloon Valvuloplasty to Predict X‐ray Projection Angles that are Perpendicular to Cardiovascular Structures
Fetterly, Kenneth A. , Greason, Kevin L. , Mathew, Verghese, Fetterly, Kenneth, Greason, Kevin

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | November 29, 2016 | Volume: 90 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 480-485

10.1002/ccd.26879 Get It

ObjectivesThe purpose of this work is to describe methods to measure the 3D angular orientation of cardiovascular structures based on a planar image of a valvuloplasty balloon. These methods facilitate X‐ray beam alignment with respect to the anatomy of interest.BackgroundX‐ray beam projections which are perpendicular to the long axis of cardiovascular structures are required to support interventional procedures, including transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI).MethodsDuring the TAVI procedure, the 3D angular orientation of the LVOT of 10 patients was measured from a single planar image of an aortic valvuloplasty balloon and the continuous range of X‐ray projection angles which are aligned with the aortic valve plane were calculated (research method). Misalignment of the X‐ray beam and TAVI valve frame was measured from images of the deployed valve. The accuracy of the research method was compared to clinical standard method to determine appropriate X‐ray projection angles, which utilized CT and aortography.ResultsUsing the clinical standard method, the median misalignment of the X‐ray beam and TAVI valve frame was 8.6° (range 2.6° to 21°). Misalignment was reduced to 2.5° (range 0° to 10°) using the research method.ConclusionsThe 3D angular orientation of cardiovascular structures can be measured accurately from a single X‐ray projection image of a known cardiovascular device contained within the anatomy of interest. For TAVI procedures, improved X‐ray beam alignment may help facilitate procedural success. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assisted care as a baseline patient risk characteristic affecting the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve insertion
Traynor, Megan M. , Greason, Kevin L. , Pochettino, Alberto , Holmes, David R. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Reeder, Guy S., Bresnahan, John F., Mathew, Verghese, Nkomo, Vuyisile T. , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | June 8, 2016 | Volume: 89 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1268-1272

10.1002/ccd.26580 Get It

BackgroundObjective measures of frailty have not been well defined as risk factors for a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve insertion. We hypothesized that assisted care as a baseline patient characteristic was a simple objective measure of frailty. We reviewed our experience to assess for an association between assisted care and outcome of operation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 597 patients operated with transcatheter aortic valve insertion from November 2008 through July 2015. The study cohort included patients with a dichotomous baseline characteristic of receiving assisted care (AC group, n = 60, 10.1%) or not receiving assisted care (NC group, n = 537, 89.9%). The endpoints of the study were operative stroke/death and 1‐year survival.ResultsThe age of the patients was 80.6 ± 9.0 years, male sex was present in 349 (58.5%), and STS predicted risk of mortality was 9.2 ± 6.2%. Alternate access was used in 26 (43.3%) patients in the AC care group and in 220 (41.0%) in the NC group (P = 0.724). Operative stroke/death occurred in 4 (6.7%) patients in the AC group and in 25 (4.7%) in the NC group (P = 0.492). Mortality at 1 year in the AC group was 14.8 ± 5.2% and in the NC group was 12.9 ± 1.7%; (P = 0. 250).ConclusionsAssisted care as a baseline patient characteristic does not result in increased operative stroke/death or 1‐year mortality in patients following transcatheter aortic valve insertion. Assisted care should not by itself preclude operation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Experience and complications associated with use of guide extension catheters in percutaneous coronary intervention
Waterbury, Thomas M. , Sorajja, Paul , Bell, Malcolm R. , Lennon, Ryan J. , Mathew, Verghese, Sandhu, Gurpreet S. , Gulati, Rajiv , Sorajja, Paul , Singh, Mandeep

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | December 23, 2015 | Volume: 88 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1057-1065

10.1002/ccd.26329 Get It

ObjectivesTo investigate the utility and safety of the GuideLiner “mother‐and‐child” catheter system during transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundIn patients with complex coronary anatomy, stent delivery can be challenging and result in procedural failure and complications. The GuideLiner is a coaxial guide extension system designed to enable deep vessel engagement and facilitate device delivery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate procedural success and safety in a series of GuideLiner‐facilitated PCI.MethodsSingle center retrospective study of PCI utilizing the GuideLiner catheter between February 2010 and October 2014. Patients who underwent PCI without GuideLiner use during the same time period were used as controls for comparison.ResultsA total of 363 cases of GuideLiner‐facilitated PCI were identified from 6,088 unique PCI procedures performed during this same time period. Patients in the GuideLiner group were older (mean age 71.5 vs. 67.8, P < 0.001) and had more multivessel disease (72% vs. 63%, P = 0.001) compared with controls. Type C lesions were present in 78% of GuideLiner cases. Procedural success resulting in successful device delivery with the GuideLiner catheter was 80.2%. Stent deformation associated with GuideLiner use occurred in 2.2% (8/363), with the incidence of this complication decreasing over device iterations. Coronary dissection attributed to GuideLiner occurred in 3.3% (12/363) and became less frequent over the study period.ConclusionsIn this consecutive series of GuideLiner supported PCI, the guide extension system enabled procedural success in the majority. A decline in device‐associated complications over time may be attributed to operator learning curve, patient selection, and improvement in catheter design. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Advance Directives of Patients With High-Risk or Inoperable Aortic Stenosis
Suri, Rakesh M. , Pislaru, Sorin V. , Greason, Kevin L. , Mathew, Verghese, Rihal, Charanjit S. , Mueller, Paul S. , Nkomo, Vuyisile T. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Sabbah, Michael S.

JAMA Internal Medicine | August 4, 2014 | Volume: 174 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1516

10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3453 Get It

Axillary Artery Conduit Formation for Arterial Access During Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Greason, Kevin L. , Suri, Rakesh M. , Pochettino, Alberto , Holmes, David R. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Mathew, Verghese, Saxena, Pankaj, Saxena, Pankaj , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Journal of Cardiac Surgery | March 19, 2014 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 308-311

10.1111/jocs.12326 Get It

Beyond the Learning Curve: Transapical Versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Treatment of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis
Greason, Kevin L. , Suri, Rakesh M. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Holmes, David R. , Mathew, Verghese, Nkomo, Vuyisile T. , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Journal of Cardiac Surgery | March 7, 2014 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 303-307

10.1111/jocs.12323 Get It

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Cirrhosis
Greason, Kevin L. , Mathew, Verghese, Wiesner, Russel H., Suri, Rakesh M. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Journal of Cardiac Surgery | July 31, 2013 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 492-495

10.1111/jocs.12177 Get It

Transaortic valve implantation via occluded saphenous vein grafts—A novel access route for transcatheter aortic valve delivery
Suri, Rakesh M. , Greason, Kevin L. , Mathew, Verghese

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | July 19, 2013 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ccd.25133 Get It

Transaortic valve implantation via direct aortic puncture has been shown to be useful alternative to more traditional access routes. In patients with previously placed ascending aorta saphenous vein grafts, access to the aortic valve may be limited. We therefore sought to detail the utility of a new approach for accessing the ascending aorta during transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the hood of previously placed saphenous vein grafts. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Vascular Access Site Injury After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion
Greason, Kevin L. , Suri, Rakesh M. , Huebner, Marianne , Reeder, Guy S., Williamson, Eric E. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Mathew, Verghese, Nkomo, Vuyisile T. , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Journal of Cardiac Surgery | June 11, 2013 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 348-352

10.1111/jocs.12140 Get It

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion Catastrophe in Inoperable Patients: Should Aortic Valve Replacement Be Denied?
Greason, Kevin L. , Bresnahan, John F., Sorajja, Paul , Suri, Rakesh M. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Mathew, Verghese, Sorajja, Paul , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Journal of Cardiac Surgery | May 16, 2013 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 336-338

10.1111/jocs.12127 Get It