Back to Authors

Sampedro, Marta Fernández

0000-0002-2885-1208

Mayo Clinic

Office of Infectious Diseases

Citations 2

Microbiologic Diagnosis of Prosthetic Shoulder Infection by Use of Implant Sonication
Piper, Kerryl E., Jacobson, Melissa, Cofield, Robert H. , Sperling, John W. , Osmon, Douglas R. , McDowell, Andrew , Patrick, Sheila , Steckelberg, James M., Mandrekar, Jayawant N. , Sampedro, Marta Fernández , Patel, Robin , Sánchez‐Sotelo, Joaquín , Patel, Robin

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | March 5, 2009 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1878-1884

10.1128/jcm.01686-08 Get It

ABSTRACT We recently described a sonication technique for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee and hip infections. We compared periprosthetic tissue culture to implant sonication followed by sonicate fluid culture for the diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection. One hundred thirty-six patients undergoing arthroplasty revision or resection were studied; 33 had definite prosthetic shoulder infections and 2 had probable prosthetic shoulder infections. Sonicate fluid culture was more sensitive than periprosthetic tissue culture for the detection of definite prosthetic shoulder infection (66.7 and 54.5%, respectively; P = 0.046). The specificities were similar (98.0% and 95.1%, respectively; P = 0.26). Propionibacterium acnes was the commonest species detected among culture-positive definite prosthetic shoulder infection cases by periprosthetic tissue culture (38.9%) and sonicate fluid culture (40.9%). All subjects from whom P. acnes was isolated from sonicate fluid were male. We conclude that sonicate fluid culture is useful for the diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection.
Effect of Electrical Current on the Activities of Antimicrobial Agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Staphylococcus aureus , and Staphylococcus epidermidis Biof
Pozo, José Luís del , Rouse, Mark S., Mandrekar, Jayawant N. , Sampedro, Marta Fernández , Steckelberg, James M., Patel, Robin , Patel, Robin

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | August 26, 2008 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 35-40

10.1128/aac.00237-08 Get It

ABSTRACT Bacterial biofilms are resistant to conventional antimicrobial agents. Prior in vitro studies have shown that electrical current (EC) enhances the activities of aminoglycosides, quinolones, and oxytetracycline against Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Escherichia coli , and Streptococcus gordonii . This phenomenon, known as the bioelectric effect, has been only partially defined. The purpose of this work was to study the in vitro bioelectric effect on the activities of 11 antimicrobial agents representing a variety of different classes against P. aeruginosa , methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and S. epidermidis . An eight-channel current generator/controller and eight chambers delivering a continuous flow of fresh medium with or without antimicrobial agents and/or EC to biofilm-coated coupons were used. No significant decreases in the numbers of log 10 CFU/cm 2 were seen after exposure to antimicrobial agents alone, with the exception of a 4.57-log-unit reduction for S. epidermidis and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. We detected a statistically significant bioelectric effect when vancomycin plus 2,000 microamperes EC were used against MRSA biofilms ( P = 0.04) and when daptomycin and erythromycin were used in combination with 200 or 2,000 microamperes EC against S. epidermidis biofilms ( P = 0.02 and 0.0004, respectively). The results of these experiments indicate that the enhancement of the activity of antimicrobial agents against biofilm organisms by EC is not a generalizable phenomenon across microorganisms and antimicrobial agents.