Leung, Sarah B.

Background: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is life-threatening for immunocompromised patients. No consensus exists on PJP prophylaxis for immunosuppressed patients without HIV, transplant, or cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of adult immunosuppressed patients with PJP diagnosed between 1990 and 2020 at Mayo Clinic. Patients with HIV, solid organ transplants, or cancer were excluded. Demographic data, treatments, and outcomes were manually abstracted. Results: The most common indications for immunosuppression were rheumatoid arthritis (19.7%), vasculitis (18.1%), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) not related to connective tissue disease (17.6%). Despite having high risk of PJP, 86.0% of patients did not receive PJP prophylaxis. Corticosteroids were the most common immunosuppressive agent used (84.5%), with 64.4% of patients receiving high-dose treatment. Nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were used for 49.7%, including methotrexate (51.0%), azathioprine (22.9%), and hydroxychloroquine (11.5%). Biologics were prescribed for 25.4%, primarily rituximab (59.2%) and infliximab (22.4%). Hospitalization occurred for 76.7% of patients; 70.3% required intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 46.6% received mechanical ventilation. The in-hospital mortality rate was 30.4% overall and 53.6% for patients on ventilation. Predictors of death included ILD [odds ratio (OR), 4.61; 95% CI, 1.75-13.00], ICU admission (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.19-11.08), and ventilator use (OR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.30-9.79). Biologic use was associated with lower odds of death (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.11-0.89). Conclusions: Most patients in our cohort did not receive PJP prophylaxis, and outcomes were poor with high mortality rates. Standardized risk stratification and prophylaxis protocols are needed to improve outcomes.

Abstract Introduction Diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients is a risk factor for cardiovascular events and premature death. Sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are increasingly used in nontransplant populations to improve diabetes control and cardiovascular and renal benefits. Limited literature exists regarding the safety and efficacy of these agents in renal transplant recipients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all kidney transplant recipients within our health system who were prescribed a SGLT2i after transplantation for diabetes. The safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of SGLT2i were analyzed. Results Thirty‐nine kidney transplant recipients were initiated on SGLT2i therapy, twenty‐seven of which remained on therapy for at least 1 year. Ten (25%) patients experienced an adverse event while on a SGLT2i, with urinary tract infections (UTI) being the most common. Seventeen patients (43%) discontinued the SGLT2i at the time of chart review, most commonly due to cost and kidney function decline. The median [IQR] hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at SGLT2i initiation of 8.4% [7.8–9.2] decreased to 7.5% [6.8–8.0%] after 3 months and 7.5% [6.5–7.9] after 12 months. No meaningful change in kidney function or tacrolimus exposure was observed. Conclusion SGLT2i may be a safe and effective treatment for diabetes in kidney transplant recipients. Cost is a barrier to SGLT2i therapy, and UTIs were the most frequently encountered adverse events in this cohort. More studies are needed to understand the safety profile and determine the effect of SGLT2i on diabetes‐related comorbidities among kidney transplant recipients.

Abstract Purpose Letters of recommendation (LORs) are highly regarded components of pharmacy residency applications, as they provide insight into an applicant’s character and capabilities. In other medical fields, differences in language have been reported for letters written for female and male applicants; however, data on gender differences in LORs for pharmacy residency applications are currently lacking. Methods LORs for applicants to our institution’s postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency program for the 2019-2020 academic year were extracted and processed by a natural language processing service. Words within 18 categories were identified and counted for each LOR. Total word count was also compared. Results Of the 473 LORs included for analysis, 320 (67.7%) were written for female applicants and 153 (32.3%) were written for male applicants. Approximately two-thirds of all writers were women for both female and male applicants. In comparing letters for women and men, there was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of LORs that contained terms in categories described as gendered, solitary/reserved, and desire. There was no statistically significant difference in total word count or in the presence of words in other categories such as grindstone, standout, agentic, or communal. When controlling for grade point average, writer gender, duration that the writer knew the applicant, and the writer’s professional position, there were no changes to the statistical findings. Conclusion Letters written for female and male applicants were largely similar with regard to length and word categories utilized. While no clear gender bias was found when evaluating pharmacy residency LORs, writers must continue to assess their implicit biases and how those biases might affect a candidate’s application.