Gwathmey, F. Winston

Background: Rupture of the pectoralis major is most commonly seen with eccentric contraction mechanisms, and surgical options in the setting of acute tear include direct repair, endocortical buttons, suture anchors, and transosseous tunnel fixation. This technique video will detail repair using a unicortical endobutton fixation construct. Indications: Surgical repair is indicated for acute, complete pectoralis major tears; incomplete tears involving rupture of the sternal head with intact clavicular head; and tears in the young, active, high-demand demographic. Delay in diagnosis increases the risk of tendon retraction and fatty atrophy. Recent literature has shown that acute repair is superior to chronic repair in functional outcome, pain relief, and overall cosmesis. Technique Description: A beach-chair position and a deltopectoral approach are used to identify and mobilize the torn and retracted sternal head of the pectoralis major. A No. 2 SutureTape is then passed through the disrupted sternal head in a Krackow fashion to allow for a 6-strand repair. Two of the suture strands are then shuttled through the endocortical button. A drill is used to create a corticectomy for endobutton placement, which is secured into place by sequentially tightening each limb. Two additional endobuttons are placed in a similar fashion to complete the construct. Results: Outcomes studies regarding patients with pectoralis major tendon ruptures who underwent endocortical button fixation reveal that 83% of patients had good or excellent outcomes in a recent systematic review. Another study showed no significant difference in functional outcomes, return to activity, or complication rate with endocortical button fixation compared with other mechanisms of fixation. Discussion/Conclusion: Unicortical endobutton fixation can provide another fixation strategy for acute pectoralis major tears in young, active high-demand individuals. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Background: Arthroscopic access to the hip can be challenging. We present a reproducible, safe, and efficient method for arthroscopic access to the hip. This can be especially beneficial for hips that may be predisposed to more difficult access. Indications: Hip arthroscopy is indicated in patients with symptomatic femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) who have failed conservative treatment options. FAI surgery aims to address both bony impingement and labral pathology in the hip. Technique: In this technique, we describe methodical steps to hip access. These steps include special attention to patient positioning and preoperative radiographs, air arthrogram, bevel control for needle joint entry, careful interpretation of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and adequate capsulotomy for viewing. Results: The majority of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI have improvements in both hip function and pain. Preoperative findings of increased center edge angle and male sex may predispose patients to more difficult hip arthroscopy access. The use of this technique may aid in reproducible access. Discussion/Conclusion: Hip arthroscopy is a good option for patients who have failed conservative treatment options and have signs and symptoms of FAI. Reproducible, safe, and efficient access to the hip is critical to starting hip arthroscopy cases. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Purpose This prospective, multicenter trial evaluates the clinical success (as measured by reoperation rates and improvements in patient‐reported outcome measures) of using circumferential compression stitches with all‐suture techniques for horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs) of the meniscus. Methods Investigators enrolled 30 patients (mean age, 38.2 years; standard deviation, 11.1 years) aged 18 to 60 years with HCTs in the symptomatic compartment at 8 centers in the United States who underwent HCT repair with all‐suture circumferential stitches using a self‐retrieving all‐inside suture passing device. Postoperative follow‐up visits were conducted at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Study outcomes included freedom from reoperation of the index meniscus repair site; knee pain and function, as measured by International Knee Documentation Committee Knee evaluation (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm Knee Scale, and Tegner Activity Scale; and serious complications observed during the study. Minimal clinically important difference at 1 year was assessed for IKDC and Lysholm. Results Twenty‐three patients had 2‐year follow‐up data available. Freedom from reoperation was 96.0% at 6 months (26/27, 91.7% at 1 year [23/25], and 82.6% at 2 years [19/23]). Significant improvement was observed in over baseline at 2 years for IKDC (36.7‐82.5; P < .001), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (52.2‐89.3; P < .001), Lysholm (50.2‐87.4; P < .001), and Tegner scores (3.3‐5.3; P = .007). Minimal clinically important difference was met or exceeded for IKDC and Lysholm scores at 1 year 69.2% and 65.4% of patients, respectively. Four patients (6.7%) experienced serious complications, of which 2 were assessed as being related to the procedure. Conclusions Repair of HCTs using all‐suture circumferential stitches placed with a self‐retrieving all‐inside suture passing device leads to a favorable reoperation rate (17.4%), significant improvements in clinical outcomes, and an acceptable rate of serious complications (6.7%) at 2 years, supporting the viability of this treatment approach in this indication. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.