Kouri, Naomi

AbstractBackgroundOther than the typical (memory‐dominant) variant, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can present as posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and behavioral/dysexecutive AD. Tangle distribution differs amongst clinical variants. Neuroinflammation is important in AD pathogenesis and may contribute to Aβ and p‐tau distribution. The relationship between pathological hallmarks, neuroinflammation and, APOE genotype in (a)typical AD is still largely unknown.MethodI will discuss our most recent studies on neuroinflammation in (a)typical AD from cohorts derived from the Netherlands Brain Bank and the Mayo Clinic. Atypicality is investigated from both a neuropathological perspective(N=19) and a clinical perspective (N=30, unpublished data). Additionally, the association ofAPOE ε4 with specific Aβ deposits (i.e., the ‘coarse‐grained plaque’ and the classic cored plaque) and their underlying neuroinflammatory response is investigated (N=60, unpublished data).ResultIn neuropathologically‐defined atypical AD, microglia, and complement show an atypical distribution across regions, resembling that of p‐tau. Clinical atypical AD variants show in addition to a distinct distribution for p‐tau and Aβ, a distinct distribution for activated microglia (CD68, MHC‐II), complement (C4b), and astrocytes (GFAP) (p<.05) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, when investigating Aβ in detail, we observed an atypical plaque, defined as the ‘coarse‐grained plaque’. This APOE ε4+ plaque is associated with increased neuroinflammation and p‐tau burden (ρ(58)=0.5 and 0.6;p<.05) in contrast to the classic cored plaque.ConclusionOur data supports that not all types of Aβ deposits are associated to p‐tau damage. Neuroinflammation, a process that is differently activated within AD variants, may be the link between Aβ aggregation and subsequent neurodegeneration and contribute to clinical variability.

AbstractBackgroundBlood‐based biomarkers of amyloid and neurodegeneration are increasingly used in clinical trials and entering clinical use. Differentially mapping the plasma markers to post‐mortem neuropathology in a community‐based sample is critical for interpretation.MethodWe identified 64 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants with antemortem plasma markers (Aβ42, Aβ40, NfL, T‐tau, Aβ42/40 ratio) measured on the Quanterix Simoa HD‐1 analyzer and with postmortem neuropathologic assessments of Alzheimer’s pathology (Braak tangle stage, Thal phase, neuritic plaque burden) and cerebrovascular pathology (Strozyk scale focused on macrovascular brain changes and Kalaria scale focused on detailed micro‐ and macro‐ vascular brain changes). Weighted linear regression models with adjustment for time between plasma markers and death were conducted with exact permutation tests to evaluate the relationships between antemortem plasma and postmortem neuropathology markers.ResultHigher plasma NfL levels and Aβ42/40 ratio were associated with both cerebrovascular neuropathologic scales (p<0.05) but were not associated with Braak neurofibrillary tangle stage, neuritic plaque score, or Thal stage (p>0.5). Plasma T‐tau was not associated with any pathological assessment. Plasma Aβ42/40 and NfL explained up to 18% of the variability in cerebrovascular neuropathologic scales.ConclusionIn this community sample of participants predominantly without dementia, plasma markers for amyloid (Aβ42/40) and neurodegeneration (NfL) were associated with cerebrovascular neuropathology at autopsy. NfL is a non‐specific marker of brain injury, therefore, its association with cerebrovascular neuropathology was in the expected direction. The association between greater cerebrovascular neuropathology and elevated Aβ42/40 requires further investigation. These findings provide evidence that cerebrovascular disease may significantly influence levels of plasma biomarkers proposed for Alzheimer’s disease. This information will be important to consider for accurate clinical interpretation of the proposed biomarkers.