Introduction: Previous studies have established the safety and economic benefits of outpatient Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) management, highlighting reduced expenses for outpatient evaluation. This context underscores the potential advantages of refined outpatient TIA management, a focus of our study, through the implementation of a novel expedited outpatient TIA workflow and assessment of its economic, administrative and clinical impact. Methods: We implemented a novel TIA pathway including streamlined assessments by emergency department (ED) physicians, a structured expedited set of diagnostic tests and outpatient follow-up with vascular neurologists within 48-72 hours of ED presentation. We conducted a retrospective cost-efficacy analysis, contrasting two phases: pre-implementation (standard ED-to-hospital admission TIA workflow from May 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020) and post-implementation (ED-to- outpatient TIA workflow from May 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021). We also compared the clinical outcomes of patients with a final diagnosis of TIA or minor ischemic stroke syndrome from the implementation cohort (May 2021-May 2022) with those from an ABCD2-matched inpatient TIA cohort evaluated in the pre-implementation period (2017-2021). Results: The newly implemented outpatient TIA workflow resulted in a 7% decrease in admissions to hospital observation status, 14.8% reduction in hospital admissions, whereas ED discharge rates rose by 20.4%. Within 8 months, these changes equated to 21 fewer hospitalizations or admissions, reducing costs by approximately $103,320 (Figure1). Laboratories, diagnostic imaging, and neurology evaluations were completed faster in the inpatient pathway. Both pathways had similar vascular risk factors and outcomes regarding final diagnosis, - diagnostic testing achieved, preventative treatments prescribed, stroke/TIA recurrences, re-admissions, TIA-related morbidity and mortality, and related ED return visits (Table 1). Conclusion: The deployment of an optimized outpatient TIA management workflow at Mayo Clinic Arizona had demonstrated improved administrative and cost efficiency, with similar clinical outcomes as inpatient TIA pathway. This investigation corroborates the efficacy of workflow enhancements in outpatient TIA settings and suggests a scalable model for analogous strategies in other medical centers.
An Interdisciplinary Intervention to Improve Time to Systemic Thrombolysis for Inpatient Acute Ischemic Strokes (5513)
Introduction: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an under-recognized stroke subtype that may benefit from hyperacute reperfusion therapies. We aimed to evaluate the ability of telestroke activations to provide CRAO diagnosis and thrombolysis. Methods: This retrospective observational study investigates all encounters conducted for acute visual loss between 2010 and 2021 in our multicentric Mayo Clinic Telestroke Network. Demographics, time from visual loss to telestroke evaluation, ocular examination, diagnostic, and therapeutic recommendations were collected for CRAO subjects. Results: Out of 9,511, 49 encounters (0.51%) were conducted for an acute ocular complaint. Five patients had possible CRAO, and 4 presented within 4.5 h from symptom onset (range 1.5–5 h). None received thrombolytic therapy. All telestroke physicians recommended ophthalmology consultation. Conclusion: Current telestroke assessment of acute visual loss is suboptimal and patients eligible for acute reperfusion therapies may not be offered treatment. Teleophthalmologic evaluations and advanced ophthalmic diagnostic tools should complement telestroke systems.
Abstract P833: Standardized Protocols Reduce Response Times for LVO Strokes
Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke treatment is time sensitive especially for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes with the goal to achieve early cerebral reperfusion. Research suggests standardized protocols incorporate early notification to reduce time from arrival to mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The MT workflow at a certified stroke center required multiple phone calls to mobilize staff and resources resulting in treatment delays. The average time from neurosurgery notification (NN) to case start (CST) was 60.4 minutes (min) resulting in average door-to-puncture (DTP) time of 124.8 min further delaying early reperfusion. Purpose: Standardize MT workflows and incorporate a 1-step notification system to reduce average NN to CST by 20% to 45 min to achieve 90 min average DTP time by 90 days post implementation. Methods: Baseline data for MT cases admitted 1/1/18 - 9/2/19 arriving in the emergency room (ER) and occurring inpatient were abstracted from stroke alert logs and the electronic health record. MT transfers were excluded. A multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders completed both high level process and workflow analysis maps and mock simulations to identify gaps. Both an analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer’s T Test were performed revealing NN to CST was most statistically significant (p<.0001) and largest root cause for overall increased DTP times. New service-specific workflows were developed including 1-step notification activated via an existing group paging system used for other purposes. Activation notified on call staff of the MT case and patient location. Data points collected were NN to CST (ED and inpatient) and DTP (ED only). Results: Average NN to CST time was 26.7 min (33.3 min decrease or 55.1%; p<.0001, n=12) resulting in DTP average of 83.4 min (41.4 min decrease or 35.3%, n=10) 90 days post-implementation. The paging system was cost-neutral due to existing licensing agreements. Conclusion: In conclusion, streamlined workflows incorporating 1-step notification reduced time from notification to staff response so MT procedures could start sooner. A multidisciplinary approach along with key stakeholder buy-in was instrumental in successful project implementation.
Abstract P827: W.I.N.G.S. to Acute Stroke Treatment
Background: Nearly 2 million neurons die each minute during an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Research demonstrates patients receiving timely treatment for AIS can have more favorable outcomes. In 4 th quarter (Q) 2018, a Stroke Center’s average door-to-needle (DTN) time was 54 minutes, acceptable for American Stroke Association’s (AHA/ASA) Get with the Guidelines (GWTG) quality requirement of DTN in 60 minutes or less. Nevertheless, time is brain and decreased DTN times can potentially improve patient outcomes. With this in mind, the emergency department (ED) implemented a quality improvement project (QIP) focused on DTN time reduction. Purpose: Improve the ED workflow by developing standardized roles and task prioritization to reduce DTN times by 20% from 54 minutes to 42 minutes by 4 th Q 2019. Methods: Guidelines and goals were established using AHA/ASA GWTG-Stroke criteria. Included were AIS patients with symptoms occurring prior to ED arrival, met eligibility criteria, and received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA). Patients with symptoms occurring after ED arrival or during the hospital stay were excluded. An interdisciplinary workgroup collaborated to formulate an evidence-based solution for workflow opportunities identified by simulations, observations, and subjective feedback. Standardized roles, similar to cardiac life support, were created. An innovative acronym, W.I.N.G.S. (weight, IV access, NIHSS, glucose, scan), was developed to strategize adoption and implementation. Education, chart reviews, and timely feedback were given to stakeholders for every stroke intervention to promote engagement. Results: In 4 th Q 2019, average DTN time decreased to 35 minutes (n=16, 35.2% reduction). The average DTN time for 1 st Q 2020 is 31 minutes (n=14, 42.6% reduction). Since QIP implementation, the current DTN record is 12 minutes. Conclusions: W.I.N.G.S. is now a commonly term used in the ED. The multidisciplinary approach was instrumental in implementing a feasible QIP based on evidence and did not compromise patient safety. Sustainability is dependent on continued commitment and engagement of the team to celebrate achievements and reflect, reevaluate, and revise any insufficiencies.