Back to Authors

Fetzer, David T.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2420-082X

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Citations 4

Percutaneous Core Biopsy Devices
Kristeva, Mariya, O’Connor, Stacy D. , Middleton, William D. , Strnad, Benjamin S. , Itani, Malak , Fetzer, David T. , Patel, Maitray D.

Ultrasound Quarterly | November 2, 2023 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-19

10.1097/ruq.0000000000000664 Get It

Abstract Percutaneous core-needle biopsy (PCNB) plays a growing and essential role in many medical specialties. Proper and effective use of various PCNB devices requires basic understanding of how they function. Current literature lacks a detailed overview and illustration of needle function and design differences, a potentially valuable reference for users ranging from early trainees to experts who are less familiar with certain devices. This pictorial aims to provide such an overview, using diagrams and magnified photographs to illustrate the intricate components of these devices. Following a brief historical review of biopsy needle technology for context, we emphasize distinctions in design between 2 major classes of PCNB devices (side- and end-cutting devices), focusing on practical implications for how each device is most effectively used. We believe a nuanced understanding of biopsy device function sheds light on certain lingering ambiguities in biopsy practice, such as the optimal needle gauge in organ biopsy, the benefits and risks associated with coaxial technique, the impact of needle selection and technique on bleeding, and the risk of unsuccessful sampling. In a subsequent pictorial, we will draw on the concepts presented here to illustrate examples of biopsy needle failure and how unrecognized needle failure can be an important and often preventable cause of increased biopsy risk and lower tissue yield.
Artifacts and Technical Considerations at Contrast-enhanced US
Fetzer, David T. , Vijay, Kanupriya , Caserta, Melanie P. , Patterson‐Lachowicz, Amber , Dahiya, Nirvikar , Rodgers, Shuchi K. , Rodgers, Shuchi K

RadioGraphics | December 23, 2022 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.220093 Get It

Survey Study on the Experience, Practice Patterns, and Preferences of the Fellows of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound for Evaluation and Management of Gallbladder Polyps Detected With Ultrasound
Middleton, William D., Fung, Christopher, Dahiya, Nirvikar, Szpakowski, Jean-Luc, Corwin, Michael T., Fetzer, David T., Gabriel, Helena, Rodgers, Shuchi K., Tublin, Mitchell E., Walsh, Andrew J., Kamaya, Aya, Fetzer, David T. , Middleton, William D., Fung, Christopher, Dahiya, Nirvikar, Szpakowski, Jean-Luc, Corwin, Michael T., Gabriel, Helena, Rodgers, Shuchi K., TUBLIN, MITCHELL E. , Walsh, Andrew J., Kamaya, Aya

Ultrasound Quarterly | February 28, 2022 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 96-102

10.1097/ruq.0000000000000597 Get It

Abstract Gallbladder polyps (GPs) are a common incidental finding on ultrasound; however, important differences in recommended management exist among professional society guidelines. An electronic survey was sent to 189 fellows of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound. Main outcomes included preferences and current practice patterns for evaluation, management, and surveillance of GPs as well as personal lifetime experience with gallbladder sonography and GPs. A total of 64 subjects (34%) with experience in gallbladder sonography completed the study. The estimated combined total number of gallbladder scans seen by the responders was 3,071,880. None of fellows had ever seen a pedunculated GP <1 cm detected on ultrasound that was proven to be malignant at the time of detection or during subsequent follow-up. All of the fellows used size as a feature to stratify recommendations. The median size threshold currently used by Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound fellows for recommending ultrasound follow-up was 6 mm, and their preferred threshold was 7 mm. The median size threshold for recommending surgical consultation was 10 mm, and the preferred threshold was 10 mm. Wall thickening and shape were considered important factors by 76% and 67% of respondents, respectively. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound fellows tend to provide recommendations most similar to the American College of Radiology and Canadian Association of Radiology guidelines for management of GPs. Many would prefer guidelines that result in fewer recommendations for follow-up and surgical consultation. Despite a substantial combined experience, this survey did not uncover any case of a small GP that was malignant.
When Benign Behaves Badly
Caserta, Melanie P. , Fetzer, David T. , Swensson, Jordan , Boyum, James H. , Rodgers, Shuchi K.

Ultrasound Quarterly | March 4, 2021 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 133-141

10.1097/ruq.0000000000000555 Get It

Abstract Hemangioma is the most common benign liver tumor and is frequently encountered as an incidental finding on imaging. The classic enhancement pattern of hemangioma is diagnostic on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and it follows the same pattern of enhancement on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. However, there is a subset of hemangiomas that demonstrate atypical enhancement patterns on CEUS. The ability to recognize the different enhancement patterns and discern when additional imaging or biopsy may be necessary is essential to accurately interpret an atypical hemangioma on CEUS. This article reviews various enhancement patterns of hemangioma on CEUS to avoid pitfalls in characterization of focal liver lesions on CEUS.