Dunlay, Shannon M.

Introduction: In vitro, ST2 is a marker of myocyte stress and inflammation but in vivo, there is no trans-cardiac ST2 concentration step-up to support cardiac ST2 activation in human heart failure (HF) calling into question the source of ST2 in HF. While ST2 is predictive of adverse outcomes in HF, the relationship between ST2 and key pathophysiologic domains in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is not well characterized. Hypothesis: ST2 levels increase in proportion to the severity of left ventricular (LV) remodeling and dysfunction in HFpEF. Methods: At enrollment, patients (n=174) from the RELAX trial testing sildenafil in HFpEF had serum ST2 levels measured and underwent assessment of pathophysiologic domains including congestion, cardiac structure and function, exercise performance (peak oxygen consumption (VO2)) and biomarkers of neurohumoral activation (NT-proBNP, aldosterone, endothelin-1), renal dysfunction (cystatin-C), fibrosis (pro-collagen III N-terminal peptide [NTP], C-telopeptide for type I collagen [CITP]), inflammation (high-sensitivity CRP [hsCRP]) and myocardial necrosis (high-sensitivity troponin-I [hsTnI]). Analysis adjusted for sex, a covariate associated with ST2 levels in normal persons. Results: See table. ST2 was associated with greater congestion, worse right ventricular (RV) pressure overload and dysfunction, lower peak VO2 and biomarkers of neurohumoral activation, renal dysfunction, fibrosis and myocardial necrosis and tended to be associated with systemic inflammation (hsCRP). ST2 was not associated with LV structure or LV systolic or diastolic function. Conclusions: In HFpEF, ST2 was associated with measures of right sided congestion, RV overload and dysfunction, exercise intolerance and other systemic markers of more advanced HF but not with LV structure or LV systolic or diastolic function. These data suggest that mechanisms distinct from LV stress stimulate ST2 activation in HFpEF.

Background: Concerns exist regarding orthotropic heart transplantation (OHT) in hepatitis C (HCV) seropositive recipients. The UNOS national registry was accessed to evaluate HCV recipient sero-positivity and outcomes. Method: Retrospective analysis of the UNOS registry (2000-2014) to evaluate recipient profile and clinical outcome of HCV sero-positive (HCV+ve) and sero-negative (HCV -ve) pts. Early and late adjusted survival and adverse events at follow-up were compared. Results: From 23,507 patients (mean age 52 yrs; 75% male), 481 (2%) were HCV +ve (mean age 52 yrs; 77% male). Annual proportion of HCV +ve recipients was comparable over the study period (range 1.3-2.7%; p=0.2). The HCV +ve cohort had more African American (22% vs 17%; p=0.01), pts with a prior LVAD (21 vs 14%; p<0.01 and more hepatitis B core Ag+ve recipients (17% vs 5%; p<0.01). However, ECMO (p=0.7), inotropic (p=0.2), and intra-aortic balloon pump (p=0.7) support, serum creatinine (p=0.7) and serum bilirubin (p=0.7) were similar. Proportion of Status 1A pts was similar (24% HCV+ vs 21% HCV -); however wait-time for HCV + recipients was longer (mean 23 vs 19 days; p<0.01). Among donor variables, age (p=0.8), hepatitis B status (p=0.4) and CDC high risk status (p=0.9) were comparable. At a median follow up of 4 years, 67.1% patients were alive, 28.4% died and 1.1% were re-transplanted (3.4% missing). Overall survival was worse in the HCV+ cohort (64.3 vs 72.9 % and 43.2 vs 55% at five and ten years; p<0.01). Late renal [OR 1.2(1-1.6); p = 0.02] and liver dysfunction [OR 4.5 (1.2-15.7); p=0.01] occur in HCV +ve recipients. On adjusted analysis, HCV sero-positivity is associated with poorer survival [HR0.6 (0.5-0.8); p<0.01]. Conclusion: A small proportion of patients receiving a heart transplant in the United States have hepatitis C. In spite of comparable pre-operative hepatic function, hepatitis C sero-positive recipients develop late liver dysfunction and have poorer long-term survival.

Introduction: Limited data is available regarding the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after heart transplantation and it`s impact on patient survival. Hypothesis: Methods: From the United Network of Organ Sharing database (January 2004 to September 2014), we identified 13,353 patients without pre-operative diabetes mellitus undergoing heart transplantation. Multivariable Cox regression was implemented to determine predictors for the development of NODM. A matched cohort of New-onset Diabetes mellitus (NODM (+)) and NODM (-) was generated by 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity-matching. The association of NODM with long-term survival was then estimated with robust Cox regression. Results are presented at the 95% Confidence level; all tests are two-tailed. Results: During the study period, 1,921 of 13,353 (14%) developed NODM. Estimated freedom from NODM was 97% (96-98%) & 77% (76 - 78%) at the end of 1 and 5 years respectively. Predictors for the development of NODM were recipient age > 50 years (HR 1.2 95% CI1.05, 1.3; p < 0.01), recipient BMI > 30 (HR 1.4 95% CI1.2, 1.6; p < 0.01) and race (African American vs Caucasian (HR 1.3 95% CI1.2, 1.5; p < 0.01)). Cox-regression of a propensity-matched cohort of 1921 NODM+ve and NODM-ve recipient-pairs demonstrates that NODM is associated with poorer survival (HR for mortality: 1.3 95% CI 1.1, 1.5; p < 0.001). Conclusions: More than one in ten heart transplant recipients develop NODM post heart transplantation. Obesity, older age, and African American race patients to be at higher risk for NODM. New onset diabetes was independently associated with an almost 30% reduced long-term survival. More than one in ten heart transplant recipients develop NODM post heart transplantation. Obesity, older age, and African American race patients to be at higher risk for NODM. New onset diabetes was independently associated with an almost 30% reduced long-term survival.

Introduction: In patients with heart failure, preferences for end-of-life (EOL) care and involvement in advance care planning can vary over their illness trajectory. The aim of this study was to compare EOL preferences by prognosis, assessed using the validated Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score, in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Hypothesis: EOL preferences and planning vary by prognosis. Methods: Between January 2014 and January 2016, Southeastern Minnesota residents hospitalized with ADHF at Mayo Clinic hospitals in Rochester, MN were prospectively recruited into an observational cohort study. Information on EOL preferences and advance care planning were assessed by patient questionnaire. MAGGIC risk scores and associated 1-year mortality estimates were calculated using patient characteristics at the time of hospital admission and stratified by quartile. The associations of EOL preferences/ planning and prognosis were examined using two sample t-tests and linear regression. Results: Among 400 patients (mean age 77.7 years, 46% female), predicted 1-year mortality ranged from 3.9-72.5% (median 22.5%). Patients with higher estimated mortality (worse prognosis) more often elected Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status (p=0.001) and more often had an advanced directive (p<0.001, Table). No other differences in EOL preferences or planning by prognosis were observed. Conclusions: In community patients hospitalized with ADHF, resuscitation preferences and rates of completion of advance care planning documents varied with prognosis, though patient-clinician EOL discussions and awareness and attitudes about EOL options did not.

Introduction: Although national guidelines call on physicians to conduct regular conversations about end-of-life (EOL) care and planning with patients with heart failure (HF), research suggests that physicians often avoid these discussions. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients hospitalized with acute decompensated HF (ADHF) reported ever discussing their preferences for EOL care with their physicians. Methods: Between January 2014 and January 2016, Southeastern Minnesota residents hospitalized with ADHF at Mayo Clinic hospitals in Rochester, MN were prospectively recruited into an observational cohort study that included the administration of face-to-face questionnaires. Patients were asked questions regarding details of EOL discussions with their physicians, their preference for prognostic information, whether they had an advanced directive, attitudes about dying and hospice, and familiarity with palliative care and hospice. Results: Among 400 patients (mean age 77.7 years, 46% female, 48% preserved ejection fraction), only 68 (17.5%) reported previously discussing EOL wishes with their physician. Most patients (62.2%) indicated a preference to discuss their prognosis with their physician. Patients reporting prior EOL discussions were more often anemic (82.6% vs. 68.9%, p=0.022), hyponatremic (28.6% vs. 12.5%, p=0.002), and married (68.1% vs. 51.5%, p=0.012). They more often recognized the term ‘hospice’ (95.7% vs. 87.3%, p=0.045), had more favorable attitudes of dying and hospice (p=0.030), and more often had an advanced directive (83.6% vs. 67.7%, p=0.010). No other differences in demographics, comorbidity burden, HF characteristics, or in-hospital and 30-day outcomes were observed. Conclusions: Only 17.5% of patients hospitalized with ADHF reported previously discussing their preferences for EOL care with their physician. Patients reporting EOL discussions were more knowledgeable about EOL options and more likely to have completed advance care planning documents. Despite increasing recognition of the importance of these conversations, they are still occurring infrequently, and represent an important modifiable gap in the optimal longitudinal care of patients with HF.

Introduction: Perceived discrimination is known to play a role in the development of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors such as hypertension, but the association with CV outcomes is less clear. A recent report from a multi-ethnic cohort study found a modestly increased risk of CV disease in participants reporting discrimination. We explored this association in an African American (AA) cohort. Hypothesis: Greater perceived discrimination is associated with a higher risk of CV disease Methods: We examined CV outcomes among 5085 AAs in the Jackson Heart Study enrolled in 2000-2004 and followed through December 31, 2012. We stratified participants by quartiles of perceived everyday discrimination and estimated the associations with CV outcomes (all-cause mortality, incident coronary heart disease [CHD], incident stroke, and heart failure [HF] hospitalization) using Cox models. Results: Greater perceived discrimination was more common in participants who were younger, male, had higher education and income, a lower perceived standing in the community, worse perceived healthcare access, and fewer comorbidities. Over a median follow-up of 9.8 years (8.0 years for HF), 573 deaths, 193 incident CHD, 156 incident strokes, and 348 HF hospitalizations occurred. Prior to adjustment, greater perceived discrimination was associated with a lower risk of death, incident CHD, stroke, and HF hospitalization (Table). After adjustment for potential confounders, we found no association of perceived discrimination with incident CHD, stroke or HF hospitalization; however, a decrease in all-cause mortality risk with higher perceived discrimination persisted. Conclusions: We found no independent association of perceived discrimination with risk of incident CV disease or HF hospitalization and a paradoxical negative association with mortality in this AA population. The unexpected finding of a lower risk of death with greater perceived discrimination requires further study.

ImportanceBarriers to heart transplant must be overcome prior to listing. It is unclear why Black men and women remain less likely to receive a heart transplant after listing than White men and women.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether race or gender of a heart transplant candidate (ie, patient on the transplant waiting list) is associated with the probability of a donor heart being accepted by the transplant center team with each offer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used the United Network for Organ Sharing datasets to identify organ acceptance with each offer for US non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) adults listed for heart transplant from October 18, 2018, through March 31, 2023.ExposuresBlack or White race and gender (men, women) of a heart transplant candidate.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was heart offer acceptance by the transplant center team. The number of offers to acceptance was assessed using discrete time-to-event analyses, nonparametrically (stratified by race and gender) and parametrically. The hazard probability of offer acceptance for each offer was modeled using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables.ResultsAmong 159 177 heart offers with 13 760 donors, there were 14 890 candidates listed for heart transplant; 30.9% were Black, 69.1% were White, 73.6% were men, and 26.4% were women. The cumulative incidence of offer acceptance was highest for White women followed by Black women, White men, and Black men (P &amp;lt; .001). Odds of acceptance were less for Black candidates than for White candidates for the first offer (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84) through the 16th offer. Odds of acceptance were higher for women than for men for the first offer (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.68) through the sixth offer and were lower for the 10th through 31st offers.Conclusions and RelevanceThe cumulative incidence of heart offer acceptance by a transplant center team was consistently lower for Black candidates than for White candidates of the same gender and higher for women than for men. These disparities persisted after adjusting for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables, possibly suggesting racial and gender bias in the decision-making process. Further investigation of site-level decision-making may reveal strategies for equitable donor heart acceptance.

Introduction: The epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) differs in women and men. However, it is not well defined whether these differences extend to the subgroup of patients that develop advanced HF or if they translate to differences in outcomes. Aim: To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of advanced HF in women and men. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with advanced HF (as defined by European Society of Cardiology Criteria) from 2007-2017. Differences in survival and hospitalization risks following advanced HF development in women and men were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen Gill models, respectively. Results: Of 936 individuals with advanced HF, 417 (44.6%) were women and 519 (55.4%) were men. Women were older (mean 79 vs 75 years) with a lower overall comorbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index 4.7 vs 5.2), less often had coronary artery disease (60% vs 79%) and hyperlipidemia (69% vs 77%), but more often had hypertension (91% vs 87%) and depression (32% vs 24%), and more often had advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction (60% vs. 30%) compared with men ( p<0.05 for each). After adjustment for age, ejection fraction and comorbidities, there were no differences in risks of survival or hospitalizations ( Figure ) between women and men (p> 0.10 for each). Conclusion: While advanced HF can occur in both women and men, their phenotypes differ; women more often present with advanced HFpEF and men with more atherosclerotic disease and advanced HFrEF. Despite these differences, survival is similar in women and men with advanced HF.

Background Little is known about outcomes following heart failure (HF) hospitalization among adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) in the United States. We aim to compare the outcomes of HF versus non‐HF hospitalizations in adults with CHD. Methods and Results Using a national deidentified administrative claims data set, patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) hospitalized with and without HF (ACHDHF+, ACHDHF−) were characterized to determine the predictors of 90‐day and 1‐year mortality and quantify the risk of mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and health resource use. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare ACHDHF+ versus ACHDHF− for risk of events and health resource use. Of 26 454 unique ACHD admissions between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020, 5826 (22%) were ACHDHF+ and 20 628 (78%) were ACHDHF−. The ACHD HF+ hospitalizations increased from 6.6% to 14.0% ( P <0.0001). Over a mean follow‐up period of 2.23 ± 2.19 years, patients with ACHDHF+ had a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86 [95% CI, 1.67–2.07], P <0.001), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.63–1.83], P <0.001) and health resource use including rehospitalization (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05–1.14], P <0.001) and increased postacute care service use (HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.32–1.85], P <0.001). Cardiology clinic visits within 30 days of hospital admission were associated with lower 90‐day and 1‐year all‐cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.49–0.78], P <0.001; OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58–0.83], P <0.001, respectively). Conclusions HF hospitalization is associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity with high health resource use in patients with ACHD. Recent cardiology clinic attendance appears to mitigate these risks.

Background Among patients with heart failure (HF), social risk factors (SRFs) are associated with poor outcomes. However, less is known about how co‐occurrence of SRFs affect all‐cause health care utilization for patients with HF. The objective was to address this gap using a novel approach to classify co‐occurrence of SRFs. Methods and Results This was a cohort study of residents living in an 11‐county region of southeast Minnesota, aged ≥18 years with a first‐ever diagnosis for HF between January 2013 and June 2017. SRFs, including education, health literacy, social isolation, and race and ethnicity, were obtained via surveys. Area‐deprivation index and rural‐urban commuting area codes were determined from patient addresses. Associations between SRFs and outcomes (emergency department visits and hospitalizations) were assessed using Andersen‐Gill models. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of SRFs; associations with outcomes were examined. A total of 3142 patients with HF (mean age, 73.4 years; 45% women) had SRF data available. The SRFs with the strongest association with hospitalizations were education, social isolation, and area‐deprivation index. We identified 4 groups using latent class analysis, with group 3, characterized by more SRFs, at increased risk of emergency department visits (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.23–1.45]) and hospitalizations (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.28–1.58]). Conclusions Low educational attainment, high social isolation, and high area‐deprivation index had the strongest associations. We identified meaningful subgroups with respect to SRFs, and these subgroups were associated with outcomes. These findings suggest that it is possible to apply latent class analysis to better understand the co‐occurrence of SRFs among patients with HF.