Précis: Glaucoma patients of similar age and educational level, compared with healthy individuals, exhibit a greater number of saccades and fixations during eye-tracking-aloud reading, resulting in reduced reading speed. Purpose: To evaluate reading performance in patients with glaucoma compared with controls using an eye tracker and to explore the potential confounding effects of patients’ contrast sensitivity and cognition. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 111 participants (57 with glaucoma and 54 controls) with a best-corrected visual acuity of ≥0.5 logMAR. Cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and contrast sensitivity was measured with the Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test. A reading performance evaluation was conducted using the Minnesota Low Vision Reading Test displayed on slides on a computer screen. Reading speed was calculated in words per minute, and an eye tracker was used to analyze saccade and fixation patterns during the reading task. Results: Mean age was 61.8 (±11.6) and 66.5 (±13.7) in the glaucoma and control groups, respectively ( P =0.05). Best-corrected visual acuity was 0.18 (±0.16) and 0.04 (±0.10) logMAR in the glaucoma and control groups, respectively ( P <0.001). Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 21.8 (±3.5) in the glaucoma and 21.4 (±4.0) in the control group ( P =0.566). A total of 26% of the glaucoma group and 33% of the control group had at least a primary education. Controls read faster and showed fewer saccades and fixations than patients with glaucoma ( P <0.05) across all 5 slides. Conclusions: Patients with glaucoma exhibit poorer reading performance, as evidenced by eye-tracking data, compared with controls of similar age, cognitive function, and educational level.
Is Reading Performance Impaired in Glaucoma Patients With Preserved Central Vision?
Precis: Although this sample with glaucoma had preserved central vision, they presented worse reading performance compared with similarly aged controls. Objective: To determine whether patients with glaucoma with preserved central vision have impaired reading performance compared with healthy controls. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 35 patients with glaucoma and 32 similarly aged controls with visual acuity better than 0.4 logMAR in both eyes. Each participant had a detailed ophthalmological examination followed by a 5-chart reading performance test using a Portuguese version of the Minnesota Low Vision Reading Test (MNREAD). Correlation between reading performance (reading speed) and ocular parameters was investigated. Results: Participants had an average age of 63.0±12.6 years. In the glaucoma group, mean deviation in the better and worse eyes was −6.29±6.36 and −11.08±0.23 dB, respectively. There was no significant difference in age, sex, rage, education, visual acuity, or systemic comorbidities between groups. Participants with glaucoma had significantly slower reading speeds, with an average of 83.2±25.12 compared with 102.29±29.57 words per minute in controls (P=0.006). Reading speed was slower for all 5 charts. Odds of glaucoma increased by 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.56; P=0.009) for each 10 words per minute decrease in average reading speed, with this relationship maintained after accounting for age, schooling, and visual acuity. Conclusions: Patients with mild to moderate glaucoma had worse reading performance compared with similarly aged controls, despite both having preserved central vision.