Hsiao, Jennifer L.

Importance Accurate classification and reliability in assessment for lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) by investigators is critical to the determination of responder status and to overall data quality in clinical trials. Objective To establish consensus-based morphological definitions of HS lesions and guidance statements that standardize investigator lesion assessments for implementation in clinical trials. Evidence Review Health professionals (primarily dermatologists) with expertise in the measurement of HS disease activity as well as novice raters completed a preliminary questionnaire in which participants were asked to assess images of HS lesions and provide qualitative feedback on their decision making. Based on this feedback, detailed morphologic definitions for lesions and guidance statements that standardize lesion assessments were formulated and presented for consensus voting in 2 electronic Delphi surveys. A virtual group discussion after round 1 supported participants in round 2 voting. Findings Response rates were 84.7% (50 of 59), 86.0% (43 of 50), and 90.9% (40 of 44) in the preliminary, electronic Delphi round 1, and electronic Delphi round 2 surveys, respectively. Morphological definitions for 11 lesion types achieved the prespecified 70% consensus threshold, with 9 definitions reaching at least 90% agreement. After 2 electronic Delphi rounds, 16 of 18 guidance statements achieved the prespecified consensus threshold, with 13 statements receiving endorsement from more than 80% of participants. Two guidance statements related to assessment of tunneled plaques with multiple openings and assessment of scalp lesions failed to reach consensus. Conclusions and Relevance Common morphologic definitions and guidance that standardize assessment of HS lesions can be implemented in clinical trial protocols and investigator trainings with the goals of improving accuracy and reliability of investigator ratings.

ImportanceMetastatic cutaneous Crohn disease (MCD) is a rare condition for which there are currently no published diagnostic criteria. Formal MCD diagnostic criteria will expand clinical care and research by enabling future diagnostic code validation, crystallizing a more uniform disease entity for the purposes of translational research, and allowing the development of more formalized outcome measures aimed at treatment response.ObjectiveTo define a set of criteria for the diagnosis of MCD.Evidence ReviewIn this consensus statement, a panel of experts on MCD and related conditions was assembled. Their opinions were gathered regarding the clinical and histologic findings that are sufficient, necessary, and highly suggestive of MCD through serial survey. Subsequent surveys were continued until consensus was achieved. Sufficient was defined as a feature that, if noted, would enable diagnosis of MCD without any other signs, symptoms, or testing. Necessary was defined as a feature that must be present to establish a diagnosis of MCD. Highly suggestive referred to any other features that were indicative of MCD but did not qualify as sufficient or necessary to diagnose MCD.FindingsOf 24 experts invited, 19 agreed to participate, with a 79% to 100% response rate across 5 rounds conducted. Five patients were also invited to participate, but none opted to participate, citing lack of clinical expertise and time concerns. The experts were all from the US; 5 (26%) have practiced medicine for 0 to 5 years, 5 (26%) practiced for 6 to 10 years, 6 (32%) practiced for 11 to 15 years, and 3 (16%) practiced for more than 20 years. A total of 18 experts (95%) worked in an academic practice setting. There was consensus agreement that MCD could present as oral disease, genital disease, or, rarely, in another location. Consensus was achieved on 2 major and 5 minor criteria for genital/other subtypes of MCD and 5 minor criteria for oral MCD. There was consensus that, while there are some pathological findings that are highly suggestive of MCD, histologic criteria are not necessary for diagnosis.Conclusions and RelevanceA panel of experts reached consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MCD described in this study. These criteria include major and minor clinical criteria, along with histopathological criteria for the diagnosis of genital and oral MCD. This consensus is a crucial step in the diagnosis of and future treatment development for MCD, a rare and clinically understudied condition.

AbstractBackgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with recurrent painful nodules and abscesses affecting the intertriginous areas. Patients often experience a significant negative impact on quality of life from associated pain, discharge, odor, scarring, and social stigma. Even with complex medical regimens, patients may report inadequate disease control. Lifestyle changes and complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are used by a majority of HS patients. Conventional medicines and lifestyle and CAM modalities strategically incorporated together can increase treatment satisfaction and success.ObjectiveWe aim to highlight lifestyle and CAM treatment modalities to use alongside conventional treatment plans for HS patients.FindingsLifestyle modifications for HS patients include weight loss, reducing skin friction, smoking cessation, and stress reduction. Dietary modifications for HS patients include limiting foods containing dairy, Brewer's yeast, and simple carbohydrates, appropriate caloric reduction, and consuming foods in the Mediterranean diet. The CAM modalities studied in HS are vitamin D, niacinamide, vitamin B12, zinc, and magnesium. Potential CAM modalities for HS include probiotics, cannabinoids, turmeric, bathing regimens, and acupuncture.ConclusionThis review is a guide for clinicians to provide evidence‐based care for HS patients seeking non‐pharmacologic treatment modalities such as weight loss, clothing choices, dietary changes, and use of supplements and complementary medicine. Lifestyle and CAM modalities may be used in parallel with conventional medicines to synergistically improve patient disease outcomes.

Abstract Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and often debilitating inflammatory condition characterized by frequent nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and scars impacting the intertriginous areas. Many patients with HS often report limited treatment success and symptom coverage with conventional therapies. Recent studies have reported the widespread use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among patients with HS. In this study, our aim was to examine current physician practice patterns, opinions, and comfort with recommending CAM. Our results indicate that provider comfort and opinions on CAM varied based on the provider's experiences, demographics, and the CAM modality itself. Overall, nearly two‐thirds (n = 30, 61.2%) of respondents agreed that CAM and conventional medicine were more effective together than either alone. Meanwhile, 44.9% (n = 22) of respondents routinely recommend CAM while 64.6% (n = 31) of respondents reported that they are routinely asked about CAM. The majority (n = 41, 83.7%) of respondents indicated a lack of scientific evidence in the medical literature as a barrier to recommending CAM along with efficacy concerns (n = 34, 69.4%) and ability to recommend reputable CAM products (n = 32, 65.3%) and practitioners (n = 32, 65.3%). Future investigations are warranted to establish a better understanding of the efficacy and benefit of CAM methods in conjunction with conventional methods.