Mishra, A.

Background: Proven salvage therapies for pts with triple-class refractory MM who progress on BCMA-targeted therapies are lacking.Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5) is a type I membrane protein that is expressed exclusively in the B-cell lineage. Cevostamab is a FcRH5xCD3 BsAb that facilitates T cell-mediated killing of MM cells. In an initial Phase I study (GO39775), cevostamab monotherapy was clinically active and had manageable toxicity in pts with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM (Trudel et al. ASH 2021). In Cohort A1 of the subsequent Phase I/II CAMMA 2 study (CO43476; NCT05535244), cevostamab was highly active and had manageable safety at the 160mg target-dose (TD) level in pts with triple-class refractory MM who had received a prior BCMA-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC; overall response rate [ORR]: 60%, 6/10 pts) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy (ORR: 73%, 8/11 pts) but had not received a prior BCMA-targeted BsAb (Kumar et al. EHA 2024). We present initial results from Cohort A2, which enrolled pts with triple-class refractory MM who had received prior BCMA-targeted therapies, including ≥1 BCMA-targeted BsAb. An exploratory analysis of baseline patient and tumor-related factors is also presented. Methods: Cevostamab was initiated with step dosing (Cycle [C] 1 Day [D] 1: 0.3mg; C1D2, D3, or D4 depending on the emergence of cytokine release syndrome [CRS] after the initial administration: 3.3mg) and continued at the 160mg TD on C1D8 and on D1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Cytokine, tumor antigen, T-cell function/activation, and inhibitory immune checkpoint expression were assessed in blood and tumor samples collected at baseline and during treatment. Results: As of February 23, 2024, 21 pts (median age: 64 years, range: 46-84) had been enrolled into Cohort A2. Seven pts (33%) had extramedullary disease and 5/12 pts (42%) with a conclusive assay result had high-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)). All pts were heavily pretreated (median prior lines of therapy: 8, range: 5-14); 62% had received ≥2 prior BCMA-targeted therapies (median time since last: 122 days, range: 68-558) and 33% had received ≥2 prior BsAbs (median time since last: 139 days, range: 68-782). Most pts (86%) were refractory to their last line of therapy; 62% were penta-drug refractory. Median follow-up was 173 days (range: 20-360). Grade (Gr) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 71% of pts (15/21). Gr 3-4 AEs in >3 pts were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia (38% each), and infections (29%). CRS occurred in 76% of pts (16/21) and was mainly Gr 1 (43%) or Gr 2 (29%); 1 patient had Gr 3 CRS. One treatment-related Gr 5 (fatal) AE of pneumonia was reported in the context of PD. No treatment-related AEs leading to cevostamab discontinuation occurred. Objective responses (partial response [PR] or better) were observed in 2/21 pts (ORR: 10%). Both pts achieved a very good PR and had ongoing responses at cut-off. Stable disease was observed in 10 pts (48%). Pts in the prior BsAb group had received more prior lines of therapy than those in the prior ADC and CAR-T groups (median 8 vs 5 and 6, respectively) and more prior BCMA-targeted therapies (median 2 vs 1 and 1). The percentage of pts with low levels (<4.5 ng/mL) of soluble BCMA in plasma was also higher in the prior BsAb group (47% vs 0% and 18%). At baseline, inhibitory immune checkpoint expression across T-cell subsets was more common in the prior BsAb group. Notably, the median frequency of PD1+CD8+Tnaive and TIGIT+CD8+Tnaive cells in blood was higher in the prior BsAb group (21% and 29%, respectively) than in the prior ADC (3% and 6%) and CAR-T groups (4% each). Peak median IL-6 and IFN-γ levels were delayed until the first TD in the prior BsAb group, suggesting a different pharmacodynamic profile. Conclusions: Cevostamab has manageable safety in pts with triple-class refractory MM who have received prior BCMA-targeted therapies, including ≥1 BCMA-targeted BsAb. Clinical responses were less frequent in the prior BsAb group than in the prior ADC and CAR-T groups, which could be explained by the higher number of prior lines of therapy and T-cell exhaustion due to multiple prior exposures to BsAbs. Notably, the high frequency of CD8+ T-cell subsets expressing inhibitory immune checkpoints in the prior BsAb group suggests a level of T-cell dysfunction that could prevent effective T-cell activation.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a transformative approach to cancer eradication. CAR-T is expensive in part due to the restricted use of each CAR construct for a specific set of tumors such as B cell lymphoma targeted with CD19 and multiple myeloma targeted with BCMA. A CAR construct with broad anti-tumor activity can be advantageous due to wide applicability and scalability of production. We show that CD126, the IL-6 receptor alpha, is an antigen that is expressed by many hematologic and solid malignancies including multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute myeloid leukemia, pancreatic and prostate adenocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer and malignant melanoma amongst others. High CD126 expression is a negative prognostic marker in many malignancies. The two CD126 targeting CAR-T cell constructs contain the CD28 anchoring domain followed by 4-1BB and CD3 zeta signaling domain. Lentiviral vectors were generated with triple plasmid (CAR, psPAX2 and pMD2.G) transfection of 293T cells and the vector concentrated by ultracentrifugation and used to transduce human T cells. T cells were isolated from leuko-reduction cones using negative selection with magnetic beads. The transduction efficiency was around 60%. The T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads and expanded for two weeks before using for downstream experiments. CD126 CAR-T cells are able to kill many tumor cells in an antigen specific manner and with an efficiency that is directly proportional to the cell surface expression of CD126 expression (rho = 0.6, p = 0.0019). The presence of soluble CD126 in the culture media did not interfere with CAR-T cell killing. The CAR-T constructs bind murine CD126. However, injection of CD126 targeting CAR-T cells in NSG mice did not lead to any evidence of hepatotoxicity and weight loss despite possible expression of this antigen on hepatocytes. In vivo studies in NSG mice with multiple myeloma (RPMI-8226) and prostate adenocarcinoma (DU-145) xenograft models (n=10 tumors per group) showed that the intravenously injected CD126 targeted CAR-T cells (107) infiltrated the tumors, expanded, produced human interferon gamma and killed the tumor cells (p<0.001). Bioluminescence imaging showed control of tumor growth in the actively treated tumors compared to the controls (p<0.05). At post mortem, mice injected with CD126 targeted CAR-T cells had smaller residual tumors compared to controls injected with non-engineered human T cells from the same donor. Binding of sIL-6R by CAR-T cells could mitigate cytokine release syndrome. In support of this, murine SAA-3 levels (the equivalent of human CRP) were lower in mice injected with CD126 CAR-T compared to controls (p<0.05), suggesting that binding of sIL-6R by CAR-T cells could mitigate cytokine release syndrome. CD126 provides a novel therapeutic for CAR-T cells in a broad variety of tumors with low risk of toxicity. Disclosures Dingli: Apellis: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding.