Use of Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Versus Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care
Findings suggest that more intensive efforts than audit and feedback will be required to improve the quality of psychosocial care, and that greater recognition of problems with emotional well-being may tax the ability of practices to link patients with appropriate services.
Changes in the Care of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Audit and Feedback: The Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care
This study is among the first to report on the use of audit and feedback to improve medical oncology practices specifically for the processes of care in NSCLC. A modest but important improvement was observed between 2006 and 2009.
Evaluating the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Care in the State of Florida: Results From the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care
Although the quality of care delivered within the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care practices seems to be high, several components of care were identified that warrant further scrutiny on a systemic level and at individual centers.
Quality of Care in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From 11 Oncology Practices in Florida
On the basis of this data set of participating institutions in Florida, several areas in the care of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer were identified as targets for future quality improvement efforts.
Degree of Variability in Performance on Breast Cancer Quality Indicators: Findings From the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care
Abstract Aim: To examine the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by women with varying levels of familial and perceived risk of breast cancer with the goal of preventing breast cancer. Methods: Cross-sectional data on CAM use were collected on 2,198 women (mean age, 63 years) personally unaffected by breast cancer in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. CAM use was compared across women at high, moderate, or average risk based on family history, as well as across categories of perceived risk of breast cancer. CAM use was also examined in relation to screening and general health behaviors, worry about breast cancer, and optimism. Results: Half (49.5%) of the women reported using at least one CAM modality with the intent of preventing breast cancer. Univariate analyses indicated that greater overall CAM use was related to greater perceived risk (P = 0.018), more general health behaviors (P < 0.0001), more breast cancer screening behaviors (P = 0.0002), greater optimism (P = 0.0002), and higher educational attainment (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that general health behaviors (P < 0.0001), education (P = 0.0027), and optimism (P = 0.037) were significant predictors of CAM use when in the same model with perceived risk and breast cancer screening behaviors. Conclusions: Many women use CAM with the goal of preventing breast cancer. General health-promoting behaviors, education, and optimism predict CAM use. Evidence-based guidance is needed for the public and health care providers on the potential and limitations of specific CAM approaches to affect cancer risk. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(6):1527–34)