Puiu, Tudor

Background Delivery of dermatologic care through telemedicine was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to analyze the teledermatology experience across Mayo Clinic's health care system to identify strengths and limitations of teledermatology. Methods Electronic health records of dermatology televisits were reviewed from multiple U.S. Mayo Clinic sites from January 2020 through January 2021. Results A total of 13,181 dermatology televisits were conducted in 6468 unique patients. Patients were primarily female (60.2%), and mean age of all patients was 34.1 years. Synchronous / live video conferencing visits were the most common (40.0%) telecare modality. Synchronous / live audio conferencing and asynchronous / store-and-forward visits comprised 33.0% and 27.0% of appointments. In total, 3944 televisits (29.9%) were successfully concluded via a single appointment. An in-person appointment was needed for 1693 patients (26.2%) after their initial televisit. For patients with a single televisit, synchronous / live video conferencing was the most common virtual modality (58.0% vs 32.2% of patients with multiple visits, p < 0.001). Patients needing in-person follow-up visits were slightly older than those who did not (mean [SD], 38.8 [22.3] vs 35.0 [23.6] years; p < 0.001) but without any sex-based difference. Around one-third of patients needed an in-person follow-up visit after their initial asynchronous / store-and-forward visit which was higher when compared with synchronous / live audio and video conferencing. Conclusion Single dermatology televisits effectively managed nearly one-third of patients who did not require in-person follow-up. An initial synchronous / live video conferencing was more likely to yield a single clinical encounter, whereas asynchronous / store-and-forward visits required more in-person follow-up. Future studies are required that focus on dermatology-specific cost, diagnoses, access, quality of care, and outcomes.

Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being used in the treatment of various solid organ and hematologic malignancies. Dermatologic toxicities associated with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) therapy have been widely reported in the literature. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these toxicities to ensure prompt recognition and treatment. Herein, we present the clinical, histopathologic, and immunofluorescence findings of 3 patients diagnosed with lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) after treatment with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. We also reviewed the literature and summarize 7 previously reported cases of LPP associated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 inhibitors. LPP was diagnosed at a median time of 24.4 weeks (range: 4–78 weeks) after initiation of immunotherapy. Clinical findings included papules, plaques, erosions, vesicles, and bullae on the trunk and extremities. Oral involvement was present in half the cases. Histopathologic features of immunotherapy-induced LPP included lichenoid or vacuolar interface dermatitis, the presence of eosinophils, and subepidermal bullae. Direct immunofluorescence demonstrated linear deposition of immunoglobulin G (IgG) or C3. Indirect immunofluorescence demonstrated linear IgG along basement membrane zone on monkey esophagus in 2 cases and linear IgG on the epidermal side of salt split skin in 3 cases. Serum anti-BP180 was elevated in all cases in which enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed.