Back to Authors

Dahman, Bassam

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7209-5369

Mayo Clinic

Virginia Commonwealth University

Citations 2

A prospective trial to evaluate the performance of the multitarget hepatocellular carcinoma blood test (mt-HBT) for screening at-risk patients: The Altus study.
Dahman, Bassam , Parikh, Neehar D. , Silva, Alvin C. , Yang, Ju Dong , Joseph, Patrick, Parikh, Neehar D , John, Binu V. , Porter, Kyle M. , Yang, Ju Dong , Strong, Laura E. , Limburg, Paul J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 19, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: TPS486-TPS486

10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.tps486 Get It

TPS486 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. HCC surveillance is associated with improved early detection and receipt of curative treatment. However, current surveillance strategies suffer from low adherence and suboptimal sensitivity. The multi-target HCC blood test (mt-HBT) is a novel early detection assay that provides a qualitative result based on a multiparametric algorithm that incorporates information from methylation markers ( HOXA1, TSPYL5, and B3GALT6), AFP, and patient sex. Here, we describe the protocol for a prospective, multicenter clinical trial designed to investigate the performance of the mt-HBT in patients at risk for HCC. Methods: ALTernative to U/S (ALTUS) is a longitudinal, multicenter, prospective study with a targeted enrollment of 3,000 participants. The main inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in the table. Participants will receive HCC surveillance imaging (either U/S or CT/MRI) and blood collection for the mt-HBT. Those with positive U/S are anticipated to receive standard-of-care imaging follow-up with a multiphase CT or MRI, and those with a negative U/S will receive a study CT/MRI within 30 days of blood collection. Imaging interpretation is based on the CT/MRI LI-RADS (LR) v2018 categories. The primary endpoints are the overall sensitivity and specificity of the mt-HBT to detect HCC, defined as pathology-confirmed HCC or hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), LR-4/5, or LR-TIV/M plus definite/probable HCC or cHCC-CCA. The secondary endpoints are mt-HBT early-stage sensitivity, and performance in a) participants with LR-5 or biopsy-confirmed HCC and b) participants confirmed non-HCC. Participants not diagnosed with a liver malignancy at visit one will continue to receive HCC surveillance, returning for a second visit ̃6 months from first blood collection. Blood will be collected after the second visit for the mt-HBT. Data on treatment will be collected for those diagnosed with HCC. Study participants and providers will be blinded to the mt-HBT results. Participants are currently enrolling across the U.S., with 60 targeted sites and an anticipated 12-month enrollment window. Clinical trial information: NCT05064553. [Table: see text]
Race and Patient-reported Symptoms in Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Report from the Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence Study
Sutton, Arnethea L. , Hurtado‐de‐Mendoza, Alejandra , He, Jun, Dahman, Bassam , Edmonds, Megan C. , Hackney, Mary Helen , Tadesse, Mahlet G. , Sutton, Arnethea L , Hackney, Mary Helen , Sheppard, Vanessa B.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 29, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 699-709

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0604 Get It

Abstract Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) improves outcomes in women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer. Suboptimal AET adherence is common, but data are lacking about symptoms and adherence in racial/ethnic minorities. We evaluated adherence by race and the relationship between symptoms and adherence. Methods: The Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence study included women diagnosed with nonrecurrent HR+ breast cancer who initiated AET. AET adherence was captured using validated items. Data regarding patient (e.g., race), medication-related (e.g., symptoms), cancer care delivery (e.g., communication), and clinicopathologic factors (e.g., chemotherapy) were collected via surveys and medical charts. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with adherence. Results: Of the 570 participants, 92% were privately insured and nearly one of three were Black. Thirty-six percent reported nonadherent behaviors. In multivariable analysis, women less likely to report adherent behaviors were Black (vs. White; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27–0.67; P < 0.001) and with greater symptom burden (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96–1.00; P < 0.05). Participants more likely to be adherent were overweight (vs. normal weight) (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04–2.43; P < 0.05), sat ≤ 6 hours a day (vs. ≥6 hours; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.25–2.70; P < 0.01), and were taking aromatase inhibitors (vs. tamoxifen; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.28–2.87; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Racial differences in AET adherence were observed. Longitudinal assessments of symptom burden are needed to better understand this dynamic process and factors that may explain differences in survivor subgroups. Impact: Future interventions should prioritize Black survivors and women with greater symptom burden.