Ruegg, S. R.

9592 Background: Palliative care (PC) is an essential part of the continuum of care for cancer (CA) patients (pts). Little is known about the aggregate characteristics and survival of pts receiving inpatient palliative care consultation (PCC). Methods: We reviewed data prospectively collected on patients seen by the Palliative Care Inpatient Consult Service at Mayo Clinic - Rochester from 2003–2008. Demographics, consult characteristics, and survival were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a Cox model of survival were produced. Results: 1794 total patients were seen over the five year period. Cancer is the most common primary diagnosis (47%). Growth in annual PCC has risen dramatically (113 in 2003 vs. 414 in 2007) despite stable total hospital admissions. Patient are predominantly men (52% vs. 48%, p=0.02); median age is 76. General medicine, medical cardiology, and medical intensive care unit services refer most often. Most frequent issues addressed are goals of care, dismissal planning, and pain control (29%, 19%, 17%). PCC in actively dying pts have increased with 27% of all non-operating room, non-trauma in-hospital deaths being seen. Although CA pts have the highest median survival after PCC vs. other diagnoses (17 days, p = 0.018), we observed a five-year trend of decreasing survival from admission to death and PCC to death. Median time from admission to death in CA pts is 36 days in 2003 and 19 days in 2008 (p<0.01). Median time from PCC to death is 33 versus 11.5 days (p<0.01). Despite this, median hospital length of stay and time from PCC to discharge have remained fixed at 8 and 2.5 days, respectively. A Cox model of survival to discharge and <6 months survival (hospice eligibility) shows hospital length of stay, time from consult to discharge, and dismissal location from hospital are all prognostic factors. Conclusions: Survival window for PC intervention for CA pts is lessening. With the trend of shorter survival after PCC, PC professionals have little over two days to implement a comprehensive, ongoing care plan. This highlights the importance of earlier outpatient palliative care involvement with advanced cancer patients and families. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Although one-fourth of all medicare dollars are spent during the last year of life, symptom management for terminal hospitalized patients has continued to be inadequate. Quality end-of-life care is often overlooked, seldom taught and rarely measured within Internal Medicine Residency Programmes. We studied the effects of a palliative care order set and educational e-mail on resident comfort. Survey of residents showed that only 54% were comfortable across nine aspects of palliative care. Three months after release, 88% of residents were using the order set and 63% believed it increased their comfort with palliative care. Resident comfort managing palliative symptoms increased an average 10% ( P = 0.02). First-year residents exposed to this order set increased in comfort from 40% to 65% ( P < 0.0001), which significantly surpassed the 48% of second-year residents who reported being comfortable ( P = 0.002). Introducing a palliative care order set improves resident comfort with symptom management in dying patients.