Lanzino, Giuseppe

Objective: Controversy exists as to whether platelet inhibition testing is necessary prior to aneurysm treatment in patients premedicated with antiplatelet agents. Using the IntrePED ( Int ernational Re trospective Study of P ipeline E mbolization D evice) registry, we studied complication rates in platelet-testing and non-platelet testing groups to determine if platelet testing is associated with improved outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms from the INTREPED registry were divided into those who received platelet testing (testing group) and those who did not (nontesting group). Morbidity, mortality and thrombotic and hemorrhagic complication rates were studied. Comparisons between groups for continuous variables were evaluated using t -tests and Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s chi-square for binary categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if platelet function testing was independently associated with poor outcomes adjusting for age, number of devices, aneurysm location, size, and use of multiple exchange wires. Results: When compared to the non-testing group, the platelet testing group suffered higher rates of ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage (12/511, 2.3% versus 0/187, 0.0%, P=0.04), neurological morbidity (42/511, 8.2% versus 4/187, 2.1%, P=0.01), and combined neurological morbidity and mortality (45/511, 8.8% versus 6/187, 3.2%, P=0.01). More patients in the testing group were treated with multiple PEDs (228 patients, 38.1% versus 57 patients, 28.4%, P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, the platelet testing group had a higher odds of total major morbidity (OR=3.80, 95%CI=1.30=11.08, P=0.01) and total major morbidity and neurological mortality (OR=2.74, 95%CI=1.11-6.79). Conclusion: Our findings caution against blind acceptance of platelet testing in Pipeline patients. Further prospective studies are needed to determine if and when platelet testing in Pipeline patients is appropriate.

Objective: We previously derived the Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS), designed using a multidisciplinary consensus approach among neurovascular specialists from diverse geographic and practice backgrounds. Here, we report on the development and validation of the final version of UIATS. Method: An international, multidisciplinary (neurosurgery, neuroradiology, neurology, clinical epidemiology) group of 69 (39 panel members and 30 blinded external reviewers) specialists in the research and treatment of UIAs was convened. A web survey-based Delphi consensus process consisting of 7 rounds was utilized to rate numerous features of potential relevance in the assessment and treatment of UIAs and to develop the UIATS. Mean ratings were repeatedly used to determine statistical weight for each factor and then transformed into corresponding scores for every item to create the UIATS. For internal and blinded external validation, 30 representative cases of patients with UIAs were used to test the level of agreement (5 point Likert Scale) with treatment recommendations based on the UIATS. Results: The final UIATS system was designed in three domains (patient-, aneurysm - and treatment-related), comprising 13 different categories and 29 different features (Figure 1). Mean agreement based on Likert scores (5 indicating strong agreement and 1 indicating strong disagreement) was 4·2 for both reviewer cohorts, whereas mean agreement per case was 4·2 (panel members) and 4·5 (external reviewers) (p=0·017, Mann-Whitney-U Test). Conclusion: The final version of UIATS system was internally and externally validated by a large multidisciplinary group of neurovascular specialists, which suggests that the UIATS reflects contemporary decision-making regarding management of a patient with an UIA. The UIATS may aid clinicians in deciding on the appropriate management for an UIA.

Introduction: Timing of clinical grading has not been fully studied in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Our primary objective was to identify at which time point the clinical assessment using the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scale (WFNS) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is most predictive of poor functional outcome. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on the association of clinical grading determined at presentation, nadir and post-resuscitation, and poor outcome. Poor functional outcome was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1-3 at 6 months. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Results: We identified 186 consecutive patients admitted to a teaching hospital between January 2002 and June 2008. Patients’ mean age was 56.9±13.7 years and 63% of the patients were women. Twenty-four percent had poor functional outcome (mortality was 17%). On univariable logistic regression analyses, GCS determined at presentation (OR=0.80; p<0.0001), nadir (OR=0.73; p<0.0001) and post-resuscitation (OR=0.53; p<0.0001), modified Fisher Scale (OR=2.21;p=0.0013), WFNS assessed at presentation (OR=1.92;p<0.0001), nadir (OR=3.51; <0.0001) and post-resuscitation (OR=3.91; <0.0001), intracerebral hematoma on initial CT (OR=4.55;p<0.0002), acute hydrocephalus (OR=2.29;p=0.0375), and cerebral infarction (OR=4.84; <0.0001) were associated with poor outcome. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, only cerebral infarction (OR=5.80; 0.0013) and WFNS grade post-resuscitation (OR=3.43;<0.0001) were associated with poor outcome. Receiving operating characteristics/area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated that WFNS determined post-resuscitation had a stronger association with poor outcome (AUC=0.90) than WFNS assessed upon admission or at nadir. Conclusions: Timing of WFNS assessment affects its prognostic value. Outcome after aSAH is best predicted by rating WFNS after neurological resuscitation.

Object We sought to determine the safety and efficacy in secondary stroke prevention of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid artery disease (SyNC). Methods This was a single-centre retrospective case series. All patients who underwent CEA for unilateral anterior circulation cerebrovascular events with ipsilateral <50% carotid stenosis from 2002 to 2020 were included. Imaging hallmarks including the degree of luminal stenosis and the presence of various vulnerable plaque characteristics (eg, intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) on MR angiography, ulceration or low-density plaque on CT angiography) were assessed. The presence of vulnerable plaque characteristics was compared between arteries ipsilateral to the ischaemic event and contralateral arteries. The prevalence of perioperative/intraoperative complications, as well as recurrent ischaemic events at follow-up was determined. Results Thirty-two patients were included in the analysis, of which 25.0% were female. Carotid arteries ipsilateral to an ischaemic event had a significantly higher prevalence of IPH when compared with contralateral arteries (80.0% vs 0.0%; p<0.001). There were no intraoperative complications. One patient (3.1%) developed symptoms of transient ipsilateral ischaemia 1 day following CEA which resolved without treatment. In a median follow-up of 18.0 months (IQR 5.0–36.0), only one patient (3.1%) experienced a transient neurologic deficit with complete resolution (annualised rate of recurrent stroke after CEA of 1.5% for a total follow-up of 788 patient-months following CEA). All other patients (31/32, 96.9%) were free of recurrent ischaemic events. Conclusion CEA appears to be safe and well-tolerated in patients with SyNC. Additional studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up intervals are needed in order to determine the role of CEA in this patient population.

Introduction: Uric acid (UA) level within carotid plaque specimens and its association with cerebrovascular events has not been detected or quantified. Systemically, serum uric acid (SUA) is a marker of inflammation and risk factor for atherosclerosis. However, its association with carotid plaque instability and subsequent cerebrovascular events remains unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that UA may play a role in carotid artery atherosclerosis and stroke pathogenesis. In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), we aimed to determine whether UA is present differentially in carotid plaques of symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients and whether SUA is associated with cerebrovascular symptoms before surgery and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the follow-up to CEA. Methods: We prospectively collected 32 carotid plaques during CEA. We qualitatively assessed the presence of UA by using Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) staining and immunohistochemistry with anti-UA antibodies. We extracted and measured the quantity of UA in carotid plaques by using an enzymatic colorimetric assay. A retrospective analysis of a clinical database of 534 consecutive patients who underwent CEA was performed. We defined as symptomatic those patients with history of stroke, TIA and amaurosis fugax. Results: UA positive staining was detected in higher number of carotid plaques from symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients on both staining, GMS [20 (86.9%) vs 2 (22.2%); p=0.001] and immunohistochemistry anti-UA [16 (69.5%) vs 1 (11.1%); p=0.004]. Moreover, we found a significantly higher concentration of UA in carotid plaque from symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients [25.1 (9.5) μg/g vs 17.9 (3.8) μg/g; p=0.021]. SUA level in patients prior to CEA was significantly higher in the symptomatic compared to the asymptomatic group [6.0 (4.8-7.1) mg/dL vs 5.2 (4.4-6.3) mg/dL; p<0.001] and it was significantly higher in patients who developed MACE after CEA versus those that did not [6.0 (4.8-7.1) mg/dL vs 5.4 (4.5-6.6) mg/dL; p=0.021]. Conclusions: UA may provide a mechanistic explanation as systemic biomarker and potential tissue contributor for carotid plaque instability and subsequent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular symptoms.

Introduction: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is currently the gold standard for evaluation of moyamoya disease (MMD) and is the basis for several grading systems. Non-invasive modalities such as MRA are also used in assessment of MMD. Accurate implementation of these staging systems for use with MRA would imply a less-invasive method of MMD monitoring. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study that compared MRA to reference DSA studies in determining MMD severity using Berlin and modified Suzuki (mSG) grading systems A single reviewer assigned modified Suzuki and Berlin grades to all included hemispheres on both MRA and DSA. The mean difference between MRA and DSA grades for each DSA reference grade was determined utilizing both grading systems. The distribution of scores was also compared between MRA and DSA using both grading systems. Results: A total of 166 cerebral hemispheres in 90 patients were included: The mean age at MMD diagnosis was 34.8 years (standard deviation [SD] = 14.2), and fifty-three patients (63.9%) were male. Mean MRA grades were significantly lower than DSA reference grades 3 and 4 utilizing the mSG system (p = <0.0001 in both cases); A similar pattern was observed for Berlin grades 2 and 3 (p = <0.0001, Table 1 ). The distribution of modified Suzuki grades on MRA was skewed toward relatively lower grades as compared to DSA (p = <0.0001): This pattern was also true for Berlin grades as well (p = <0.0001, Table 2 ). Conclusions: DSA is essential in the evaluation of MMD, as MRA is shown to underestimate disease stage, with a greater degree of underestimation in more severe disease. We suggest DSA be performed in order to aid in appropriate treatment planning.

Background: Patients with cerebral or spinal cavernous malformations (CM) and a primary headache disorder are often limited in medication options due to concern for bleeding risk. Methods: From a prospective cohort of CM patients (2015–2020), demographics, mode of clinical presentation, and radiographic data were collected. Follow up of patients was performed with electronic medical record review, in person visits and/or written surveys. Select medication use was ascertained from the time of the CM diagnosis to a censor date of first prospective symptomatic hemorrhage, complete surgical excision of sporadic form CM, or death. The influence of non-aspirin NSAID (NA-NSAID), triptan, or OnabotulinumtoxinA on prospective hemorrhage risk was assessed. Results: As of August 20, 2020, 329 patients with spinal or cerebral CM (58% female; 20.1% familial; 42.2% initial presentation due to hemorrhage; 27.4% brainstem) were included. During a follow-up of 1799.9 patient years, 92 prospective hemorrhages occurred. Use of NA-NSAIDs, triptans, and OnabotulinumtoxinA after the diagnosis of CM was unassociated with an increased risk of prospective hemorrhage. Conclusions: Use of triptans and NA-NSAIDs, does not precipitate CM hemorrhage. Similarly, we did not find that OnabotulinumtoxinA precipitated CM hemorrhage in a limited number of patients at doses <200 units per session.

Background Headache in patients with moyamoya disease is an under-addressed topic in the medical literature. Delay in the diagnosis of moyamoya disease or inappropriate treatment of headache could lead to devastating cerebrovascular outcome. With the evolving understanding of moyamoya disease, migraine pathophysiology, and various migraine-specific medications that have become available, it is crucial to provide an updated overview on this topic. Methods We searched PubMed for keywords including moyamoya disease, moyamoya syndrome, headache in moyamoya, surgical revascularization, surgical bypass, migraine and moyamoya, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). We summarized the literature and provide a comprehensive review of the headache presentation, possible mechanisms, the impact of various surgical revascularizations on headache in patients with moyamoya disease, and the medical management of headache incorporating novel migraine-specific treatments. Results and conclusion: The most common headache phenotype is migraine; tension-type headache, hemiplegic migraine, and cluster headache have also been reported. Most patients experience improvement of headache after surgical revascularization, though some patients report worsening, or new-onset headache after surgery. Given the complexity of moyamoya disease, careful consideration of different types of medical therapy for headache is necessary to improve the quality of life while not increasing the risk of adverse cerebrovascular events. More prospective studies are warranted to better understand and manage headache in patients with moyamoya disease.