Lanzino, Giuseppe

Carotid-cavernous dural arteriovenous fistulas causing debilitating ocular symptoms and/or retrograde cortical venous drainage necessitate curative treatment, which is achieved by disrupting the proximal draining vein. Transvenous embolization of carotid-cavernous dural arteriovenous fistulas can be achieved through the superior or inferior petrosal sinuses, facial veins, or superior ophthalmic veins. 1 , 2 However, if these approaches are not feasible, various percutaneous approaches have been described that use the skull base foramina to provide direct access to the cavernous sinus. 3 , 4 Here we present the case of a 54-year-old male with carotid-cavernous dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage causing diplopia that was cured using a percutaneous transorbital approach. We discuss the alternative endovascular strategies for treating carotid-cavernous dural arteriovenous fistulas and why they were not chosen, the technical nuances of the transorbital approach as well as the pearls and pitfalls of this seldom used technique. A comprehensive understanding of the many approaches for treating carotid-cavernous dural arteriovenous fistulas is important for neurointerventionalists.

In 1965, Prof. Salomón Hakim described, for the first time, a condition characterized by normal pressure hydrocephalus and gait alterations. During the following decades, definitions such as “Frontal Gait”, “Bruns’ Ataxia” and “Gait Apraxia” have been frequently used in pertinent literature in the attempt to best define this peculiar motor disturbance. More recently, gait analysis has further shed light on the typical spatiotemporal gait alterations that characterize this neurological condition, but a clear and shared definition of this motor condition is still lacking. In this historical review, we described the origins of the terms “Gait Apraxia”, “Frontal Gait” and “Bruns’ Ataxia”, starting with the first works of Carl Maria Finkelburg, Fritsch and Hitzig and Steinthal during the second half of the 19th century and ending with Hakim’s studies and his formal definition of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). In the second part of the review, we analyze how and why these definitions of gait have been associated with Hakim’s disease in the literature from 1965 to the present day. The definition of “Gait and Postural Transition Apraxia” is then proposed, but fundamental questions about the nature and mechanisms underlying this condition remain unanswered.

BACKGROUND: The dorsal brainstem and cerebellomesencephalic fissure are challenging surgical targets. To afford a preferentially craniocaudal trajectory to this region, the precuneal interhemispheric transtentorial approach (PCIT) has been proposed. OBJECTIVE: To didactically describe and compare exposures and anatomic indications of the supracerebellar infratentorial approach (SCIT) and PCIT to the cerebellomesencephalic fissure. METHODS: Nine formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric head specimens were used to perform a midline SCIT and bilateral PCITs and measure the distance of each approach. Twenty-four formalin-fixed specimens were used to measure the distance from the most posterior cortical bridging vein entering the superior sagittal sinus to the calcarine sulcus and the torcula. Fifty-one magnetic resonance images were reviewed to calculate the angle of each approach. Three illustrative surgical cases were described. RESULTS: Mean distances from the brain or cerebellar surface to the operative target of the PCIT and SCIT were 7.1 cm (range: 5-7.7 cm) and 5.5 cm (range: 3.8-6.2 cm), respectively. The SCIT provided direct access to structures of the quadrigeminal cistern bilaterally. The PCIT provided access from the ipsilateral inferior colliculus to the ipsilateral infratrochlear zone. The PCIT's benefit was the direct access it provided to the cerebellomesencephalic fissure because of its superior to inferior trajectory. CONCLUSION: The PCIT is indicated for unilateral lesions of the cerebellomesencephalic fissure and dorsal brainstem that harbor a craniocaudal long axis and do not have a superior extension beyond the superior colliculi. The SCIT is beneficial for lesions that extend bilaterally, have an anteroposterior long axis, or involve the Galenic complex.