Mena, Raul

359 Background: GA, FOLFIRINOX and FOLFIRI are standard chemotherapy (CTX) regimens for mPC.The optimal introduction of these regimens following GA is not known. This phase II study evaluated 2 different approaches to this question. Methods: Eligibility criteria included 1) untreated mPC, 2) ECOG PS 0/1, 3) organ function adequate for Rx. Patients (pts) were treated according to one of 2 methods following GA given per standard dose/schedule: FOLFIRINOX (bolus 5-FU omitted) for up to 12 cycles at 24 weeks or at time of disease progression (S); or GA alternating with FOLFIRI q8 weeks up to 48 weeks total Rx (A). Results: 54 evaluable pts (28S, 26A) were enrolled . Pt characteristics included median age 65, M/F 48/52% , liver involvement 89%. 17/53 pts (31%) did not achieve disease control at 8 weeks (8 toxicity/complications , 6 disease progression, 3 declined further protocol therapy). Of the remaining 37 pts, 24/13 were treated with S/A regimens, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment toxicities reported while on study with frequency ≥ 10% included anemia 21%, neutropenia 43%, thrombocytopenia 15%, and fatigue 22%. Grade ≥ 3 neuropathy occurred in 8% of pts. For all 54 pts using RECIST 1.0, CR/PR/SD/DC was 2 (4%)/20 (37%)/19 (35%)/41(76%). Ca19.9 response ≥ 90% was seen in 20/37 (54%). For all pts, median OS was 12.3 months ( 95% CI 8.6-14.5 mo); 12 and 24 mo OS was 51% and 11%, respectively. For the 37 pts with DC on GA at 8 weeks (calculated from start Rx) median OS was 13.5 mo (95% CI 10.7-15.4 mo); 12 and 24 mo OS was 55% and 16% , respectively. No statistically significant differences were seen between S and A with respect to toxicity, response or survival. Conclusions: 1) As opposed to introduction of 5FU-based CTX at the time of disease progression/prohibitive toxicity, introduction prior to that time may be at least comparable regarding both toxicity and OS. 2) This approach may further enhance OS in pts who achieve DC on GA at 8 weeks. 3) Neither S nor A method of 5FU-based CTX introduction following GA was clearly superior in this study. 4) How best to combine 5FU-based combination CTX following GA in mPC merits further study. Supported by the Seena Magowitz Foundation.

Abstract Learning Objectives After reading this article, the reader should be able to: Monitor for and treat to prevent bone loss in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving an aromatase inhibitor.Describe the methodology of the Z-FAST and ZO-FAST clinical trials.Discuss the effectiveness and tolerability of zoledronic acid when administrated to prevent bone loss associated with aromatase inhibitors. CME This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Background. The interim (12-month) results of two similarly designed, ongoing studies (the Zometa®-Femara® Adjuvant Synergy Trials [Z-FAST and ZO-FAST]) suggest that zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) when initiated with adjuvant letrozole increases bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer compared with patients who receive zoledronic acid only when bone loss became clinically significant or a fragility fracture occurred. Methods. An integrated analysis was performed to maximize the value of the large pool of data from the two studies in answering clinically relevant questions. The primary objective was to compare the change in LS BMD at month 12. Secondary objectives included comparing (a) the change in total hip (TH) BMD, (b) changes in bone turnover marker concentrations, (c) time to disease recurrence, and (d) safety at month 12. Findings. The integrated analysis included 1,667 patients. At month 12, LS BMD was 5.2% higher in the upfront group than in the delayed group; TH BMD was 3.5% higher. N-telopeptide and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase concentrations decreased by 21.3% and 12.8% in the upfront group and increased by 21.7% and 24.9% in the delayed group, respectively (p < .0001 for intergroup comparisons). Fewer patients receiving upfront zoledronic acid experienced disease recurrence than patients in the delayed group—seven patients (0.84%) versus 17 patients (1.9%) (p = .0401). Fracture rates were similar. No confirmed osteonecrosis of the jaw was reported. Conclusions. The results of this analysis strengthen the statistical validity of the preliminary results of the Z-FAST and ZO-FAST studies, showing that upfront zoledronic acid prevents aromatase inhibitor–associated bone loss more effectively than delayed-start zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer receiving letrozole. Additionally, disease recurrence appears to be lower with upfront zoledronic acid, but further follow-up is needed to confirm these interim results.