Janis, Jeffrey E.

Background: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) care facilitates coordinated expertise that leads to improved patient safety and outcomes. Yet, no prior study has quantified reported benefits from plastic surgery–inclusive MDTs across several procedures. We thereby hypothesized that plastic surgery–inclusive MDTs would lead to better surgical outcomes following cranioplasty, spine surgery, abdominoperineal resection, abdominal wall reconstruction, and extremity reconstruction, compared with the primary specialties acting alone. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for comparative studies comparing outcomes of care provided by plastic surgery–inclusive MDT and non–plastic surgery–inclusive MDT. Results: Thirty studies with a total of 9614 patients were included. Plastic surgery–inclusive MDT care was associated with reduced odds of wound complications in abdominoperineal resection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–0.90) and spine procedures (OR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33–0.97). In addition, plastic surgery–inclusive MDT care for extremity reconstruction and abdominal wall reconstruction was associated with lower odds of wound complications ([OR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12–0.46] [OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12–0.90]), reoperation ([OR = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04–0.49] [OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.03–2.39]), and shorter length of stay (mean difference, −19.5 and −0.62, respectively). Conclusions: Plastic surgery–inclusive MDT care significantly reduces wound complication and reoperation rates across complex surgical procedures. These findings support the formal integration of plastic surgeons within MDTs to improve patient outcomes and surgical safety.

Background: Primary trigger point deactivation surgery has been successful in reducing or eliminating nerve compression headaches between 79% and 90% of the time. The aim of this review article was to discuss the factors that contribute to index trigger point deactivation surgery failure, the importance of reevaluating trigger points following failure, and the options for secondary surgery. Methods: A literature search was performed using a combination of keywords involving “chronic headache” and “nerve deactivation surgery,” in databases until February 2023. Results: Data of 1071 patients were evaluated and included (11 articles). The failure rate after index trigger point deactivation surgery occurs is approximately 12%, primarily due to incomplete primary trigger point deactivation. Secondary trigger points may not appear until the primary trigger is eliminated, which occurs in 17.8% of patients. Reevaluation of previously diagnosed trigger points as well as uncovered trigger points and additional preoperative testing is indicated to help determine candidacy for further surgical deactivation. To address scarring that could contribute to failure, corticosteroid injection, acellular dermal matrix, adipofascial fat, or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sleeves have been described with beneficial effects. For neuroma management, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, targeted muscle reinnervation, a combination of both, relocation nerve grafting, or nerve capping have also been described. Neurectomy can be performed when patients prefer anesthesia and/or paresthesia over current pain symptoms. Conclusion: Secondary trigger point deactivation surgery is indicated when there is suspicion of incomplete deactivation, internal scarring, neuroma, or newly-diagnosed trigger points.

Summary: Fewer than half of all patients undergoing surgery report adequate postoperative pain relief. Poorly managed postoperative pain can lead to complications, increased hospital stays, prolonged rehabilitation, and a decreased quality of life. Pain rating scales are commonly used to identify, manage, and track the perceived intensity of pain. Changes in perceived pain severity and intensity are a key indicator for course of treatment. Postoperative pain is best treated with multimodal management with a variety of analgesic medications and techniques that target different receptors and mechanisms of action in the peripheral and central nervous systems. This includes systemic analgesia, regional analgesia, local analgesia (eg, topical and tumescent analgesia), and nonpharmacologic modalities. It is recommended that this approach is individually tailored and discussed through a shared decision-making approach. This review provides an overview of multimodal management for acute postoperative pain related to plastic surgery procedures. To increase patient satisfaction and provide effective pain control, it is recommended to educate patients on expectations of pain, multimodal options for pain control (including peripheral nerve blocks), complications of unrelieved pain, tracking and monitoring of pain by self-reporting, and how to reduce the use of opioid-based pain medication.

Background: Diversity, whether related to age, gender, ethnicity, race, geography, or experience, is increasing in all realms of medicine, including plastic surgery. Research has also become more diverse in those who conduct studies and those who participate in them. Fittingly, surgeons who produce prominent research are likely to come from diverse backgrounds. This study was designed to analyze the diversity of authorship in peer-reviewed plastic surgery journals. Methods: Using the Web of Science database, the authors identified the 100 most-cited articles from the highest-impact plastic surgery journals from January 2010 to December 2020. Author, institutional, and topic information was collected. Results: There was an average of 5.6 authors on the top 100 articles, of which 96.1% involved collaboration and 75.7% mixed-gender authorship. The average number of affiliations was 2.1, of which 51.5% involved cross-institutional collaboration, 12.6% came from both domestic and international institutions, 30.1% involved multiple specialties, and 10.7% came from both academia and private practice. Having both domestic and international authors was found to be most predictive of more citations on multiple regression, with year as a nonconfounding variable (P < 0.05), followed by mixed-gender authorship (P < 0.10). Conclusion: Impactful publications in plastic surgery come from diverse sets of authors and institutions.

Abstract Background With doctors in short supply and a strong demand for surgeon services in all areas of the United States, urban and rural, there are pressures to remain in active practice for longer. Even with an older workforce, there are currently no requirements for when a surgeon must retire in the United States. Objectives The aim of this article was to highlight the importance of the aging surgeon to the medical community and to provide an evidence-based overview of age-related cognitive and physical issues that develop during the later stages of a surgeon’s career. Methods A search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database was performed for the phrase “aging surgeon.” Inclusion criteria were applied to include only those articles related to surgeon age or retirement. Additional reports were handpicked from citations to substantiate claims with statistical evidence. Results The aging surgeon contributes extensive experience to patient care, but is also prone to age-related changes in cognition, vision, movement, and stress as it relates to new techniques, surgical performance, and safety measures. Studies show that although surgeons are capable of operating well into their senior years, there is the potential of decline. Nevertheless, there are proven recommendations on how to prepare an older surgeon for retirement. Conclusions Age-related trends in cognitive and physical decline must be counterbalanced with wisdom gained through decades of surgical experience.

Abstract Background Plastic surgery faculty, residencies, and institutions are frequently judged on the quantity and quality of their research output. Some of the most impressive individuals in the specialty receive financial support in the form of grants and payments to help with research ideas. Objectives The authors sought to discern if funding directly correlates to greater impact in the top plastic surgery journals as measured by citations. Methods Using the Web of Science database, the authors identified the 50 most-cited articles in each of the top plastic surgery journals from January 1975 to August 2020. The articles were scanned for funding sources and categorized as industry, federal, foundational, and institutional, while stratifying by decade. Results Between 16 journals, 13.3% of the most-cited articles received funding, 2.6% of which came from industry, 5.4% from government, 4.4% from foundations, and 0.86% from institutions. The percentage of most-cited articles and the proportion that received funding were both correlated with decade (P = 0.0017 and P = 0.043, respectively). However, only the percentage of articles was found to significantly increase over time (P = 0.0068). Conclusions Although funding leads to meaningful publications, this study showed that financial support is not required to have an influence in plastic surgery research.