LaPlant, Betsy

Abstract Abstract 1790 CLL is incurable with conventional therapies and prognosis is poor in patients with relapsed or treatment refractory disease. Patients with purine analogue refractory disease and defective TP53 function have limited therapeutic options. Based on: 1) The ability of purine analogues to decrease tumor burden; 2) Higher response rates in patients treated with alemtuzumab and rituximab vs. alemtuzumab alone; and 3) Data showing that more frequent lower doses of rituximab could be more effective than standard therapy, we hypothesized that combination therapy with pentostatin, alemtuzumab and low dose rituximab (PAR) would be effective and tolerable therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL and those with previously untreated progressive CLL who had 17p13-. This two stage phase II University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE clinical trial (NCT00669318) was approved by Mayo Clinic and the University of Iowa IRBs according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The aims are to assess: 1) Complete (CR) and overall responses; and 2) Progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and time to next treatment (TTT). Patients with progressive CLL (including the SLL variant) defined by standard criteria are eligible for this study if they had either previously treated CLL or previously untreated CLL with 17p13-. Cycle 1 of therapy is 5 weeks with rituximab 20 mg/m2/d IV Mon-Wed-Fri starting day 1, subQ alemtuzumab beginning days 3–5 with a dose escalation (3 mg–10 mg– 30 mg/d) and then 30 mg/d Mon-Wed-Fri, and pentostatin 2mg/m2/dose/IV days 8 & 22. Cycles 2–3 are each of 4 weeks duration and are the same as weeks 2–5 of cycle 1. Patients who achieve CR after cycle 2 with a negative CT scan and bone marrow study with no evidence of residual CLL cells after immunohistochemical staining, do not receive cycle 3 of therapy. All patients receive granulocyte growth factor support after pentostatin therapy as well as PCP and herpes virus prophylaxis. Patients are tested for CMV reactivation by PCR weekly during therapy and treated with valganciclovir if reactivation is detected. We report the results of the planned interim analysis performed after completion of therapy for the first 19 patients (July 2008 - October 2010). The median patient age was 63 years (range 47–78) with 74% males. Two patients with 17p13- were previously untreated. Of the 17 previously treated patients (median 2 prior regimens, range 1–6), 8 (47%) had purine analogue refractory CLL (disease progression < 6 months of treatment). Nine (47%) patients had advanced clinical stage (Rai III-IV). Adverse molecular prognostic factors were 17p13- (n=8, 42%, 2 also had 11q22-), 11q22- (n=1), unmutated IGHV (12/17, 71%), ZAP70+ (≥20%, 12/17, 71%) and CD38+ (≥30%, 6/18, 33%). The median beta-2-microglobulin level was 4.3 (range 2.4 – 12.6). Grade 3–4 treatment related toxicities were 9 non-hematological and 20 hematological events. Grade 3–4 infections occurred in 3 patients including one patient requiring hospitalization for CMV re-activation. Fourteen (74%) patients responded to treatment with 6 (32%) CR (includes 2 CRi) and 8 (42%) partial responses (PR). Five (26%) patients had stable disease (SD). Eleven (58%) patients completed 3 cycles of therapy. One patient achieved a CR with no residual disease after 2 cycles of therapy and received no further treatment per protocol. Median duration of response is 7 months (95% CI: 4–not reached (NR)). Among the 8 patients with 17p13- there were 3 CR/CRi, 4 PR, and 1 SD. Four patients proceeded to allogeneic transplant with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and were censored for TTT at the initiation of transplant related therapy. With a median of 16 (range 6 – 35) months of follow up, median PFS is 7 months (95% CI: 5–NR), median TTT is 27 months (95% CI: 5-NR) and the calculated median overall survival is 23 months (95% CI: 14–NR). We report that PAR is effective and tolerable therapy in this population of relapsed refractory patients with high to very-high risk CLL. In addition, the responses in patients with 17p13- were similar to that of the patients who did not have 17p13-. The treatment regimen was useful for disease control in 3 patients who proceeded to reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation. This study shows that PAR could play an important role in the treatment of recurrent and high risk CLL. Supported by the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE CA097274 Disclosures: Zent: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: We previously reported that Lenalidomide combined with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) has significant activity in non-GCB (non-germinal center B-cell) subtype of DLBCL as defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using Hans algorithm (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):251-7). However, defining non-GCB subtype of DLBCL by IHC as opposed to the "gold standard" gene expression profiling (GEP) is subject to technical limitations and its prognostic value has not reproduced in some recently published studies. In addition, recent reports questioned prognostic value of GEP in prospective clinical trials as opposed to initial reports from retrospective case series. To address these concerns, we assessed outcomes by cell of origin (COO) as determined via GEP using NanoString Lymphoma Subtyping Test (LST) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue on patients enrolled in a phase 2 study of R2CHOP and an independent comparison cohort of patients treated with RCHOP alone. Methods: Eligible patients for R2CHOP phase 2 study MC078E were adults with newly diagnosed, untreated, stages II-IV CD20 positive DLBCL. Patients received oral lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-10 with standard dose R-CHOP every 21 days for 6 cycles. All patients received pegfilgrastim on day 2 of each cycle and aspirin prophylaxis. DLBCL molecular subtype was determined by GEP using NanoString LST, a multiplexed digital gene expression assay performed on the nCounter® Dx Analysis System and reported as GCB vs ABC vs unclassified. A comparison cohort of RCHOP treated DLBCL patients was generated from the prospectively enrolled Mayo Clinic component of the Lymphoma SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER). MER patients meeting the same inclusion criteria as MC078E with available tissue were selected based via matching on age, stage, and IPI to the MC078E patients. Event-free survival was defined as time from diagnosis (MER) or study registration (MC078E) to progression, re-treatment, or death. EFS24 was defined as being event-free at 24 months. Associations between COO and outcome were assessed via log-rank tests due to censoring for EFS24. Results: 50 MC078E R2CHOP patients enrolled between 2008 and 2013,124 matched MER RCHOP patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 were assessed for COO. Median follow up in 70 patients still alive was 7.9 years (1.9-13.0) in RCHOP treated patients and 4.4 years (1.9-5.5) for 24 in R2CHOP treated patients still alive. Median age was 65 years (range 35-89) in RCHOP treated patients and 69 years (22-87) in R2CHOP patients (p=0.485). 53 RCHOP treated patients (43%) and 31 R2CHOP treated patients (62%) had intermediate-high or high IPI (p=0.021). COO was GCB, ABC, and unclassified DLBCL subtype in 80, 31 and 13 patients in the 124 RCHOP cohort and 33, 13 and 4 patients in the R2CHOP treated patients, respectively (see table). EFS24 was inferior for ABC (48%) compared to GCB DLBCL 71% in MER RCHOP treated patients (p=0.013). In contrast, in R2CHOP treated pts, EFS24 was not different between ABC vs GCB DLBCL 69% vs 67% (p= 0.674). Conclusion: Cell of origin classification of DLBCL determined by NanoString LST remains prognostic in a series of prospectively enrolled DLBCL patients treated with RCHOP. R2CHOP shows promising efficacy in ABC DLBCL as defined by NanoString LST, where the addition of lenalidomide to RCHOP appears to mitigate the negative impact of an ABC molecular subtype on the outcome. Table Table. Disclosures Nowakowski: Morphosys: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Maurer:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Storhoff:NanoString Technologies, Inc.: Employment, Other: Stock option. Dennis:NanoString Technologies, Inc.: Employment, Other: Stock option. Gandhi:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hagner:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rimsza:NCI/NIH: Patents & Royalties: L.M. Rimsza is a co-inventor on a provisional patent, owned by the NCI of the NIH, using Nanostring technology for determining cell of origin in DLBCL..

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a devastating event occurring in approximately 5% of patients treated with standard R-CHOP (Thanarajasingam et al, ASH 2015, abs 1456). Isolated CNS relapse is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. New treatment regimens with agents that cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) are needed. The combination of lenalidomide with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) has shown promising results in activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL in phase 2 studies and is currently being evaluated in randomized trials. Lenalidomide crosses the BBB and has been demonstrated to have single-agent activity in relapsed CNS lymphoma. Accordingly, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP may decrease the risk of CNS relapse. Here we characterize the combined incidence of isolated CNS relapse in a population of DLBCL patients who received R2CHOP for induction therapy in two independent phase 2 studies. Methods We analyzed the incidence of isolated CNS relapse in patients with histologically-confirmed DLBCL enrolled in two R2CHOP phase 2 trials - one conducted by Mayo Clinic (MC) and the other by Italian Lymphoma Foundation (FIL) - in the context of clinical variables that included age, gender, disease stage, cell of origin, and administration of CNS prophylaxis. We assessed CNS-International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) factors (age, stage, lactate dehydrogenase level, ECOG performance status, extranodal sites, adrenal/kidney involvement) and classified patients into groups of low, intermediate, and high risk of CNS relapse. The risk of CNS relapse in R2CHOP-treated patients was then estimated and compared against published rates in RCHOP-treated patients based on CNS-IPI score. Results One hundred thirty-six patients with DLBCL from both cohorts (87 MC patients, 49 FIL patients) were included in this analysis. Mean age was 65 and median follow-up in 104 patients still alive was 48.2 months (range: 2.1-88.5). 61.8% of patients were male; 86.0% had stage III disease or higher; 44.1% had ECOG performance status of 0; cell of origin phenotype by immunohistochemistry according to Hans algorithm was germinal center B-cell (GCB), non-GCB (ABC), and not available in 43.4%, 36.8%, and 19.8%, respectively; 14.7% received intrathecal (IT) methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis per local practice. No patients received intravenous methotrexate. 10.3%, 71.3%, and 18.4% of patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high-risk CNS-IPI groups, respectively. Only one of 136 patients developed isolated CNS relapse, corresponding to an estimated incidence of CNS relapse of 0.007 (0.7%). Conclusions Despite a large proportion of patients with intermediate and high risk of CNS relapse treated in both phase 2 studies, induction therapy with R2CHOP in patients with DLBCL is associated with a lower-than-expected rate of isolated CNS relapse. The latter is unlikely to be explained by use of IT chemotherapy, which is considered to be marginally effective in this setting and was implemented only in a small proportion of patients. This suggests that addition of CNS-penetrating small molecules, such as lenalidomide, to R-CHOP may decrease the risk of CNS relapse. Disclosures Chiappella: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Nowakowski:Morphosys: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cavallo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gaidano:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Spina:Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee; Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee. Vitolo:Takeda: Other: Honoraria for lectures; Gilead: Other: Honoraria for lectures; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures.

Abstract Background: Ixazomib is an experimental, orally bioavailable, proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). In the dose escalation studies, ixazomib was tolerated up to a dose of 5.5 mg given every week as a single agent, while a dose of 4 mg was utilized in the combination studies with lenalidomide. We undertook this study to examine the efficacy and tolerability of the two doses of ixazomib in combination with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM. Patients and methods: This was a randomized phase 2 study of two doses of ixazomib (4mg; Arm A or 5.5 mg; Arm B) given weekly for three weeks with a week off along with weekly dexamethasone (40 mg) in patients with relapsed MM, who are proteasome inhibitor na•ve (including bortezomib) or have received less than 6 cycles of therapy with bortezomib and had a PR or better with no progression at the time of discontinuation. The primary objective was to determine the confirmed overall response rate (>=PR); secondary objectives included progression free and overall survival. A total of 71 patients were accrued from February 2013 to April 2015; one patient was ineligible. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two arms; median age across the study was 70 years (46-84); 53% were male. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-6); 90% of the patients had prior IMiDs, 70% had prior transplant and 29% had prior bortezomib. At a median follow up of 10 months, 17 (49%) and 19 (54%) of patients had disease progression in arms A and B respectively with 12 (34%) patients in each arm still continuing on treatment. All patients in each arm were evaluable for response; the overall response rates were 31% in arm A (95%CI: 17-49) and 51% (95%CI: 34-69) in Arm B. The depth of response, event free survival and overall survival are outlined in Table 1. Among the patients with no prior bortezomib exposure the response rates were 38% for Arm A and 52% for Arm B. The treatment was well tolerated with 2 patients in each arm discontinuing treatment for adverse events; there were no on study deaths. A grade 3 or higher AE that was at least possibly related to treatment was seen in 21% and 54% in Arms A and B respectively; with 15% and 37% hematologic and 6% and 29% non-hematologic AEs. The most common attributable toxicities encountered included fatigue, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea and nausea with more grade 3 toxicities among Arm B. Peripheral neuropathy, possibly related to ixazomib, was seen in 55% (only grade 1 or 2) in arm A and 43% (2 patients with grade 3) in Arm B. Toxicities led to dose reduction of ixazomib in 17% and 43% of patients in Arm A and B respectively; the median number of cycles administered were 5 (1-24) and 5 (1-22) respectively. Conclusions: Ixazomib in combination with dexamethasone was well tolerated with significant anti-myeloma activity in this group of patients with relapsed MM. Deep responses including stringent CR were observed. The higher dose of ixazomib appears to be associated with a higher response rate but with higher rate of adverse events requiring dose reductions. Table 1. Treatment outcome in all patients Arm B (4 mg) (N=35) Arm C (5.5 mg) (N=35) Response Rate 31% (95%CI: 17-49) 51% (95%CI: 34-69) No. of Responders 11 18 sCR 0 1 CR 1 0 VGPR 7 8 PR 3 9 MR 5 1 Median Overall Survival1 NA NA 6 Months 100% 100% Median Event Free Survival1,2 8.4 mos (95%CI: 4.3-13.2) 8.2 mos (95%CI: 3.8-16.3) %Event Free at 6 Months 60% (95%CI: 45-81) 60% (95%CI: 45-81) Median Duration of Response1 16.7 mos (95%CI: 9.3-22.0) 16.3 mos (95%CI: 7.0-20.1) Median Time to Response 1.1 mos (range: 0.8-3.6) 1.0 mos (range: 0.8-7.5) CI: confidence interval; mo: month; NA: not attained 1Kaplan Meier 2Event-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the first of disease progression, death due to any cause, or subsequent treatment for multiple myeloma. Disclosures Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

Abstract Abstract 3610 Purpose Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is incurable with conventional chemotherapy treatments. Nurturing of leukemic CLL B cells by marrow microenvironment appears to be one important method of chemoresistance (NEJM 2005). Epigallocatechin 3 gallate (EGCG), the major catechin in green tea, induces caspase-dependent death CLL B-cells and down regulates anti-apoptotic proteins (Mcl-1; XIAP) critical for enhanced apoptosis resistance of CLL B-cells (Blood 2004). In Phase I and II clinical testing, we found EGCG induced a decline in absolute lymphocyte count and/or lymphadenopathy in the majority of Rai stage 0-II CLL patients (JCO 2009; ASCO 2010). In these phase I/II studies, trough plasma EGCG levels as high as 8 mM were achieved. Since it does not cause myelosuppression, EGCG has the potential to be combined with other chemotherapeutic agents used for CLL. We previously reported that pharmacologically achievable plasma levels of EGCG have an additive or synergistic effect when combined with fludarabine (F), chlorambucil (C), and FC in the majority of patients (ASH 2009). In this study, we evaluated i) the effect of pharmacologically achievable doses of EGCG when combined with bendamustine (B) and ii) the ability of pharmacologically achievable doses of EGCG to overcome in vitro stromal rescue of CLL B-cells exposed to B or FC. Methods We first evaluated the effects of EGCG combined with B to establish if this partnership would be additive or synergistic. Primary CLL cells were treated with B (12.5-100 mM) with or without 4 uM EGCG. After 48 hours cells were stained with annexin/PI, and viability analyzed by flow cytometry. Data were analyzed using the CalcuSyn program (Chou & Talay method) to determine the combination index (indicating antagonistic, additive or synergistic effects). Next, we evaluated the ability of 4 mM EGCG to overcome stromal rescue of CLL cells treated with B or FC. To eliminate the cytotoxic effects of FC and B on stromal cells, we treated CLL cells with FC or B for 24 hours, washed with PBS, and then cultured these drug exposed cells directly on the HS-5 human stromal cell line with or without 4 mM EGCG for 48 hours (FC) or 24 hours (B). Cells were harvested and viability of CD19+ cells was assessed by annexin/PI staining. To specifically evaluate the ability of 4 mM EGCG to overcome stromal protection, co-culture samples in which no stromal protection was observed were excluded. Similar experiments were conducted using primary bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) from CLL patients (Leuk Res, 2007). In these experiments the fludarabine/chlorambucil combination was used as an approximation of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide since the active form of cyclophosphamide (4-hydroxycyclophosphamide) rapidly breaks down in aqueous buffer and is not readily available for in vitro use and. Results We previously observed additive or synergistic FC and EGCG interactions in a majority of patient samples (ASH 2009). 4 mM EGCG was less consistently beneficial when combined with increasing doses of B in the absence of stroma. Synergistic or mixed synergistic/additive effect was seen in 5 patients, mixed additive/antagonistic effects in 3, and antagonistic effects in 2. Given previously observed synergy with FC and additive/synergistic interactions with at least some B treated samples, we next explored the effects of EGCG on stromal cell rescue. Co-culture with HS-5 stromal cells significantly reduced both B and FC mediated cell death. However the addition of 4 μM EGCG significantly attenuated stromal cell rescue of CLL B-cells exposed to B and FC therapy (Fig. 1A and 1B respectively). Remarkably in the case of FC, 4 mM EGCG almost completely abrogated stromal rescue. Experiments using primary bone marrow MSC cultures from CLL patients yields similar results (n=3, data not shown). Conclusions Pharmacologically achievable doses of EGCG appear to reduce stromal rescue of CLL cells treated with B or combinations of purine nucleoside analog/alkylating agents. This occurs in the absence of detectable stromal cell kill by EGCG. These findings, coupled with the favorable toxicity profile and lack of myelosuppression in phase I/II trials of EGCG make it an attractive agent to test in combination with bendamustine or purine analogue/alkylating agent chemo-immunotherapy for patients with CLL. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Polyphenon Pharma: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2802 Background: Redundancy of pro-survival signaling pathways promotes survival and drug resistance in lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies. In particular, the PI3K-Akt and the MEK-ERK pathways have been shown to play an important role in the proliferation and survival of these malignant cells induced by various cytokines in the tumor microenvironment. Sorafenib, a Raf kinase and VEGF receptor inhibitor, and everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, have synergistic cytotoxicity in myeloma and lymphoma cells due to inhibition of multiple signaling pathways. Methods: We designed a Phase 1/2 clinical trial to identify the maximum tolerated doses of the two drugs used in combination and the efficacy of the combination. Patients (Pts) with relapsed myeloma or lymphoma were eligible for enrollment. Pts were required to have an absolute neutrophil count ≥1500 × 10(6)/L, a platelet count ≥75,000, and a serum creatinine 21.5 mg/dL. The study utilized the classic 3+3 design. Extensive pharmacokinetic studies were performed to better delineate potential drug interactions. Results: Twenty-six pts were accrued from August 2007 to February 2009. Four pts discontinued sorafenib during cycle 1 for various reasons (2 patient refusal, 1 unrelated medical condition and 1 physician discretion) and were excluded from MTD determination. An additional pt did not have measurable disease and was ineligible, leaving 19 pts with lymphoma (including 6 with Hodgkin lymphoma) and 2 with myeloma for phase I analysis. The pts had a median age of 56 years (range, 22, 69) and were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). Eighteen (86%) had received a prior stem cell transplant. Four dose limiting toxicities were seen across all dose levels (Table). These included grade 3 vomiting (level 1), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (level 2 and 3, one each) and grade 2 hand and foot rash leading to treatment delay (level 3). Overall, 13 pts experienced a grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 19%, 43%, and 38% of pts, respectively. Four pts have experienced a grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity; no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included hypokalemia, weight loss, vomiting, hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Dose level 1 (sorafenib 200 mg and everolimus 5 mg daily) was best tolerated and was selected for phase 2 evaluation. The ORR was 33% (7/21;95% CI: 15–57%, Table) with 3 pts at dose level 0 (2 PR, 1 CR), one at level 2 (1 PR) and three at level 3 (2 PR, 1 CR) responding. The responders included 5 pts with Hodgkin's disease and one each with an NK cell and T-cell lymphoma. Pts have received a median of 6 cycles (range: 1–19) of treatment. 16 pts have discontinued treatment due to disease progression (13 pts), non-resolution of cytopenias (1 pt), physician discretion (1 pt), and death on study due to lymphoma (1 pt). Disease progression has been seen in 16 pts; 9 pts have died. Median follow-up for pts still alive is 18.7 months (range: 11.5–29.4). 6 pts died from disease progression, one each due to sepsis unlikely related to treatment, cholecystitis, and unknown causes. Sorafenib is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 CYP3A enzyme and RAD-001 mainly by the CYP3A4 system in the liver, hence there is a potential for interactions. The detailed PK analyses performed as part of this trial showed a decrease in the RAD001 levels following initiation of sorafenib on day 8 of cycle 1 (Figure). Conclusion: The combination of sorafenib and everolimus is safe at a recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib 200 mg and everolimus 5 mg daily. There is no significant drug interaction seen. Activity has been observed, especially in the setting of Hodgkins Disease. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma. Witzig:Novartis and Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding, Served on advisory boards with Novartis and Celgene – both uncompensated with compensation to Mayo Clinic.

Abstract Abstract 3452 Poster Board III-340 PURPOSE Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is incurable with current chemotherapy treatments. Epigallocatechin 3 gallate (EGCG), the major catechin in green tea, has been shown to induced caspase-dependent death CLL B-cells and down regulate anti-apoptotic proteins (Mcl-1; XIAP) known to increase the resistance of CLL B-cells to apoptosis (Blood 104:788-94). In Phase I testing for patients with early stage CLL (Rai 0-II), EGCG treatment was well tolerated and induced a decline in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and/or lymphadenopathy in the majority of treated patients without myelosuppression (JCO 27:3808-14). Although peak plasma EGCG levels were not measured in this study, trough plasma EGCG levels as high as 4 μg/ML were achieved. To further our understanding of the potential clinical applications of EGCG for patients with CLL, we evaluated the effects of EGCG on the viability of CLL B-cells when combined with fludarabine (F), chlorambucil (C), or fludarabine and chlorambucil in combination (FC). METHODS Primary CLL B-cells were treated with various doses of F (0.25-1 μM), C (10-30 μM), or FC either alone or in combination EGCG (50 to 100 μM). In other experiments, CLL B-cells were treated with various doses of F (0.25-1 μM), C (10-30 μM), or FC with or without a fixed dose of EGCG known to be physiologically achievable in vivo (4 μM). After 48 hours (experiments with C +/− EGCG) or 72 hours (experiments with F +/− EGCG or FC +/− EGCG), cells were harvested, stained with annexin/PI and viability analyzed by flow cytometry. After concentration-effect curves were generated for each agent, data were also analyzed using the CalcuSyn software program (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK) which uses the method of Chou and Talalay to determine whether combination treatment yielded greater effects than expected from summation alone. A combination index (CI) of 0.8 – 1.2 indicates an additive effect, a CI >1.2 indicates an antagonistic effect and a CI <0.8 indicates a synergistic effect. RESULTS Primary leukemic B-cells from 56 CLL patients were cultured in vitro with various doses of EGCG alone or in combination with F, C, or FC. The median LD50 was approximately 100 μM. Although % apoptotic cells at the 100 μM EGCG dose did not vary based on Rai stage, ZAP-70 status, IGHV gene mutation status, or cytogenetic abnormalities by FISH, CD38 negative patients had greater cell death than CD38 positive patients (67% vs. 49%; p=0.05). In co-titration experiments, EGCG had an additive (CI 0.8 – 1.2) or synergistic (CI <0.8) effect on apoptosis when combined with C in the majority of patients (13/15; additive 11, synergism 2) with rare individuals demonstrating antagonism (CI >1.2; 2/15). The effects of EGCG when combined with F in co-titration experiments were more variable with a relatively even distribution between antagonism (8/18), additive effects (4/18), and synergy (6/18). However, co-titration experiments of FC with or without EGCG demonstrated additive or synergistic effect in most patients (8/10; additive 7, synergism 1). Next we evaluated the effect of F (0.25 - 1 μM), C (10 - 30 μM), or FC with or without a fixed dose of EGCG known to be physiologically achievable in vivo (4 μM). This dose of EGCG had an additive or synergistic effect in the majority of samples across the spectrum of dose levels under all 3 conditions (F, C, and FC). For example, at the 10 μM dose of C the addition of 4 μM EGCG had an additive or synergistic effect in 11/14 patients (synergistic 6; additive 5). With F at the 2.5 μM dose level the addition of 4 μM EGCG had an additive or synergistic effect in 13/16 patients (synergistic 7, additive 6). The addition of 4 μM EGCG appeared particularly beneficial when given in combination with FC (Fig.). For example, at F 2.5 μM in combination with C 5 μM the addition of 4 μM EGCG had an additive or synergistic effect in 10/10 patients (synergism 7; additive 3). CONCLUSIONS Physiologically achievable doses of EGCG appear to enhance the efficacy of alkylating agents, purine nucleoside analogues, and alkylating agent/purine analogue combination therapy for the majority of CLL patients on in vitro testing. The favorable toxicity profile of EGCG and lack of myelosuppression with this agent in the phase I trial (JCO 27:3808-14) make it an attractive agent to test in combination with purine analogue and alkylator based chemo-immunotherapy for patients with CLL. Disclosures Kay: Genentech, Celgene, Hospira, Polyphenon Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; Biogenc-Idec, Celgene, Genentech, genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Polyphenon Pharma : Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide (Len) is clinically active in CLL patients (pts). Robust anti-leukemic immune response from Len is truncated by dysfunctional immune system in CLL and anti-apoptotic bcl-2 protein. We hypothesized that therapeutic downregulation of Bcl-2 may help enhance the killing potential of immune effector cells that are activated by Len. AT-101 is a novel, orally active BH3-mimetic that binds to antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins (Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL) and induces CLL cell death ex vivo (Masood et al British Journal of Haematology 2012). Encouraging efficacy and safety results of AT-101 alone or in combination with rituximab in CLL have been reported in Phase I/II studies. We have previously demonstrated that bcl-2 downregulation in CLL cells enhanced the killing potential of Len-activated immune cells. Conversely, pretreatment of CLL cells with Len enhanced AT-101 cytotoxicity in an immune cell independent manner (Masood et al British Journal of Haematology 2012). These preclinical findings formed the basis of a phase I/II clinical trial testing the combination of AT-101 and lenalidomide in relapsed B-CLL patients. Methods: The phase I portion of this study (NCT 01003769) utilizes a standard cohort of three design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination regimen. The MTD is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients. Following the MTD determination, the phase 2 portion will assess the efficacy of this combination using a one-stage design with an interim analysis. Key inclusion criteria include adult CLL pts with relapsed disease who have received 1-4 prior lines of treatment (Rx) (phase I) or 1-2 lines of Rx (phase II), last dose > 4 weeks from enrollment, ECOG performance status 0-2, good renal/liver function, acceptable blood counts. Patients with known hypersensitivity to thalidomide/Len or prior use of gossypol/AT-101 were excluded. Cycle 1 Rx includes Len alone and cycles 2-12 includes Len and AT-101. Starting doses of Len and AT-101 are 5mg oral daily on days 1-21 and 40 mg oral twice daily (b.i.d) on days 1-3 of a 28-day cycle. Planned dose escalation is shown in Table 1. Three pts will be treated at each dose level and observed during the first cycle of the combination Rx. Dose limiting toxicity is defined as grade 4 anemia unrelated to disease, thrombocytopenia-grade 4 or grade 3 with bleeding/requiring platelets, ANC <500 for >14 days, febrile neutropenia , Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. Dose from Phase II will be based on MTD from phase I. Peripheral blood and bone marrow will be collected and analyzed for immune cellular microenvironment and effect of Len and AT-101 on molecular targets. Optional lymph node biopsy will be done at baseline and if tumor-flare reaction occurs. This study is expected to accrue a maximum of 26 pts in phase I and 34 pts in phase II, overall maximum sample size of 60 pts. Five pts in phase I have been accrued to date. Table 1 (* starting dose level) Table 1. (* starting dose level) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Patients with very-high risk (purine analogue refractory and TP53 defective) CLL have limited treatment options. In these patients alemtuzumab can be effective against CLL cells in the circulation and bone marrow, and in combination therapy with fludarabine can be active in patients with bulky disease, but these regimens have a high risk of serious infections. Addition of rituximab to alemtuzumab can also improve efficacy but has limited activity against bulky disease. We conducted a phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy and toxicity of therapy with pentostatin, alemtuzumab, and low dose higher frequency rituximab (PAR) in patients with relapsed/refractory or progressive CLL with 17p13 deletion. The rituximab schedule was designed to decrease the loss of CD20 expression by circulating CLL cells. Methods This two-stage phase II trial study (NCT00669318) conducted at the Mayo Clinic Rochester and University of Iowa with IRB approval had an accrual goal of 38 evaluable patients. Eligibility required a diagnosis of progressive CLL by standard criteria and either previous treatment for CLL (<4 purine analogue regimens) or 17p13 deletion (17p13-). Exclusion criteria were organ failure, poor performance status (ECOG >3), infection with HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, active autoimmune cytopenia, or alemtuzumab therapy within the past 2 months. Rituximab 20 mg/m2 IV M-W-F started on day 1, alemtuzumab started on day 3 with an escalation of 3-10-30 mg/d SQ and then 30 mg M-W-F from day 8, and pentostatin 2 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks started on day 8. Peg-G-CSF or GM-CSF was used after each dose of pentostatin and patients received Pneumocystis and Varicella prophylaxis. CMV PCR assays were done weekly during treatment and viremia was treated with either valganciclovir or ganciclovir. Cycle 1 was 5 weeks and subsequent cycles were 4 weeks. At the end of cycle 2 patients with a clinical CR had a CT scan and a bone marrow study with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for residual CLL cells, and therapy was stopped if there was no radiological or IHC evidence of residual CLL (stringent CR). Patients with residual disease received a 3rd cycle of therapy. Results Forty-one patients were enrolled (July 2008 - February 2013) and all 39 who started therapy were evaluable for response: Median age 61 years (range 47-78), 30 (77%) males, 36 (92%) relapsed/refractory CLL (median prior regimens = 2, range 1-10), 3 (8%) previously untreated, 23 (59%) advanced stage (Rai III-IV), 16 (41%) intermediate stage (Rai I-II). Prognostic factors: FISH (hierarchical classification) 15 (38%) 17p13-, 6 (15%) 11q22-, 5 (13%) 12+, 3 (8%) no defects, 8 (21%) 13q14-, and 2 (5%) other abnormalities, IGHV analysis (n=38) 27 (71%) unmutated (<2%), ZAP-70 (n=37) 28 (76%) positive (>20%). Thirty (77%) patients completed planned therapy (28 had 3 cycles, 2 had 2 cycles with stringent CR). Nine patients received one (n=4) or two (n=5) cycles of therapy because of disease progression or complications. Grade 3-4 hematological adverse events (n=37) at least possibly related to treatment included neutropenia (n=22), thrombocytopenia (n=11), anemia (n=2) and hemolysis (n=2). Non-hematological adverse events (n=17) included infections/neutropenic fever (n=8), fatigue (n=3), and hemorrhage (n=2). CMV reactivation was detected and treated in 14 patients (grade 1-2). No patients died during treatment or from treatment related complications. The overall response rate was 56% (95% CI 40-72) with 4 (10%) CR, 7 (18%) CRi, 11 (28%) PR, 7 (18%) SD, and 10 (26%) PD. Four patients (3 CR and 1 CRi) had IHC negative bone marrow studies. Thirteen (33%) patients have died due to progressive CLL (n = 11), sepsis (n=1), and pneumonia (n=1). Median follow up for surviving patients is 23 months (range 3-55). Seven (18%) patients proceeding to RIC allogeneic transplant were censored for time to next treatment. Twenty-one (54%) patients required therapy for progressive CLL and 7 (18%) have required no further therapy. Median progression free survival was 7 months (95% CI: 5-16), time to next treatment 9 months (95% CI: 6-27) and median overall survival has not been reached. Discussion PAR was effective and tolerable therapy for high-risk CLL. This study suggests that alemtuzumab can be used safely in combination with a purine analogue in a short-duration regimen. Disclosures: Zent: Genentech : Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Biothera: Research Funding; GlaxSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pentostatin therapy for CLL, use of lower doses of rituximab.

Abstract BACKGROUND: CD49d (a.k.a. alpha 4 integrin) plays a critical role in leukocyte trafficking, activation, survival, and facilitates interactions between leukocytes and stromal cells via VCAM-1 and fibronectin. We and others have previously reported that CD49d gene expression in CLL B-cells correlates with CD38 expression (Durig Blood101:2748; Pittner Leukemia19:2264). We have also confirmed CD49d protein expression correlates with CD38 protein expression on CLL B cells (Pittner Leukemia 19:2264). Notably, one small study reported that CD49d expression may relate to overall survival among CLL patients independent of CD38 status (Zucchetto, Leukemia 20:523), although the relationship to other prognostic markers, such as ZAP-70 and cytogenetic abnormalities, was not evaluated. METHODS: We measured CD49d expression by flow cytometry in 130 patients with CLL (NCI 1996 criteria), accrued to observational studies at Mayo Clinic, between 1994 – 2006. CD49d expression was measured by 2 color flow cytometry using antibodies specific for CD19 (BD Biosciences) and CD49d (BD Pharmingen). CD49d expression was compared to level of CD38 expression, ZAP-70 expression, and degree of IgVH gene mutation (all treated as continuous variables). We also evaluated the relationship between CD49d expression and time to treatment (TTT) and other prognostic parameters, using the previously published 30% threshold to classify CD49d expression (Zucchetto, Leukemia 20:523). Finally, we evaluated the relationship between CD49d expression and in vitro sensitivity to fludarabine (1 um x 24 hrs) and chlorambucil (1um x 24 hrs) in a subset of 70 patients. RESULTS: The percent of B-cells expressing CD49d varied from 0.3 to 99.4% among the 130 patients tested (median expression= 6.1). The level of CD49d strongly correlated with the expression of ZAP-70 (r=0.34; p<0.0001) and CD38 (r=0.65; p<0.0001), as well as the degree of IgVH gene mutation (r=−0.29; p=0.006). The relationship between CD49d expression and other prognostic parameters using the previously published 30% threshold to classify CD49d expression is shown in Table 1. The median time to treatment for patients with low CD49d expression was 14.9 years compared to 5.4 years for those with high CD49d expression (p=0.008) High CD49d expression was correlated with in vitro resistance to chlorambucil (r=0.27, p=0.03) but not fludarabine (r=0.20, p=0.09). CONCLUSION: CD49d expression varies on CLL B-cells and relates to other prognostic parameters and TTT as well as in vitro sensitivity to chlorambucil. Since CD49d facilitates interactions between CLL B-cells and stromal cells, the association of this marker with poor prognostic features and in vitro drug resistance may relate to enhanced stromal nuturing of leukemic cells with higher CD49d expression. Additional studies are needed to determine whether CD49d expression may be clinically useful as a prognostic test or to predict response to treatment in patients with CLL. CD49D low CD49D high P value % ZAP70+ 33.0 75.0 <0.0001 % IgVH unmutated 24.3 55.6 0.02 %CD38+ 12.8 63.9 <0.0001 FISH <0.0001 %with 17p- or 11q- or 6q− 9.2 25.0 % with +12 5.8 43.8 %with normal or 13q− 85.1 31.3 Current Stage 0.17 0 30.9 16.7 I-II 67.0 77.8 III-IV 2.1 5.6