Gottesman, Reena

AbstractBackgroundAt present, no research criteria exist for the diagnosis of prodromal behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Leveraging data from carriers of pathogenic genetic mutations as a proxy for frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology, we sought to develop and test a proposed set of research criteria for prodromal bvFTD, termed “Mild Behavioral and/or Cognitive Impairment in bvFTD” (MBCI‐FTD).MethodParticipants included 68 carriers of a pathogenic mutation in microtubule‐associated protein tau (MAPT), or progranulin (GRN), or a repeat expansion in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72), with mild behavioral and/or cognitive changes. Based on extensive clinical workup, the prodromal mutation carrier group was divided into a Development Group (N=22) and a Test Group (N=46). The Development Group was selected to be the subset of the prodromal mutation carriers for whom we had longitudinal evidence of conversion to a bvFTD phenotype, and were used to develop the criteria. The Test Group was the remainder of the prodromal mutation carriers (e.g., single visits only) and was used to validate the criteria. Familial non‐carriers were included as controls (N=165).ResultFrequencies of behavioral and neuropsychiatric features, neuropsychological deficits, and social cognitive dysfunction in prodromal mutation carriers and non‐carrier controls were assessed. Based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, seven core features were identified: apathy without moderate‐severe dysphoria, behavioral disinhibition, irritability/agitation, reduced empathy/sympathy, repetitive behaviors (simple and/or complex), joviality/gregariousness, and appetite changes/hyperorality. Supportive features include a neuropsychological profile of impaired executive function or naming with intact orientation and visuospatial skills, reduced insight for cognitive or behavioral changes, and poor social cognition. Three core features or two core features plus one supportive feature are required for the diagnosis of Possible MBCI‐FTD; Probable MBCI‐FTD requires imaging or biomarker evidence, or a pathogenic genetic mutation. The proposed MBCI‐FTD criteria correctly classified 95% of the Development Group of prodromal mutation carriers, and 41% of the Test Group, with a false positive rate of <10%.ConclusionWe present the first diagnostic criteria for prodromal bvFTD. Future research should prioritize establishing generalizability to non‐genetic cases, and testing the specificity of these criteria against psychiatric, neurologic and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Abstract At present, no research criteria exist for the diagnosis of prodromal behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), though early detection is of high research importance. Thus, we sought to develop and validate a proposed set of research criteria for prodromal bvFTD, termed ‘mild behavioural and/or cognitive impairment in bvFTD’ (MBCI-FTD). Participants included 72 participants deemed to have prodromal bvFTD; this comprised 55 carriers of a pathogenic mutation known to cause frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and 17 individuals with autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration. All had mild behavioural and/or cognitive changes, as judged by an evaluating clinician. Based on extensive clinical workup, the prodromal bvFTD group was divided into a Development Group (n = 22) and a Validation Group (n = 50). The Development Group was selected to be the subset of the prodromal bvFTD group for whom we had the strongest longitudinal evidence of conversion to bvFTD, and was used to develop the MBCI-FTD criteria. The Validation Group was the remainder of the prodromal bvFTD group and was used as a separate sample on which to validate the criteria. Familial non-carriers were included as healthy controls (n = 165). The frequencies of behavioural and neuropsychiatric features, neuropsychological deficits, and social cognitive dysfunction in the prodromal bvFTD Development Group and healthy controls were assessed. Based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, seven core features were identified: apathy without moderate-severe dysphoria, behavioural disinhibition, irritability/agitation, reduced empathy/sympathy, repetitive behaviours (simple and/or complex), joviality/gregariousness, and appetite changes/hyperorality. Supportive features include a neuropsychological profile of impaired executive function or naming with intact orientation and visuospatial skills, reduced insight for cognitive or behavioural changes, and poor social cognition. Three core features or two core features plus one supportive feature are required for the diagnosis of possible MBCI-FTD; probable MBCI-FTD requires imaging or biomarker evidence, or a pathogenic genetic mutation. The proposed MBCI-FTD criteria correctly classified 95% of the prodromal bvFTD Development Group, and 74% of the prodromal bvFTD Validation Group, with a false positive rate of &lt;10% in healthy controls. Finally, the MBCI-FTD criteria were tested on a cohort of individuals with prodromal Alzheimer’s disease, and the false positive rate of diagnosis was 11–16%. Future research will need to refine the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria, and incorporate emerging biomarker evidence.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) can present with significant phenotypic heterogeneity. Most cases of sporadic FTD do not present for diagnosis until functional impairment is evident, making it difficult to identify and characterize the earliest features of FTD. Focusing on participants from families with known FTD‐causing pathogenic mutations allows for the characterization of the earliest features of FTD in genetic carriers.MethodThe ARTFL and LEFFTDS consortia (AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976) are joint, multi‐center cohort studies of patients with FTLD, including symptomatic and asymptomatic family members. For this study, a subset of ARTFL/LEFFTDS participants from families with known genetic mutations were selected if they were determined by a study physician to have (a) a phenotype of Mild Behavioral / Cognitive Impairment (MBI/MCI) and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5 (44 participants, 19 C9orf72, 12 GRN, 13 MAPT mutations), or (b) CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 1 (33 participants, 16 C9orf72, 10 GRN, 7 MAPT mutations). We examined the NACC Uniform Data Set (UDS) B9F form, bvFTD criteria. Pearson chi‐squared tests compared the frequency of identified bvFTD features between MBI/MCI and bvFTD participants.ResultThe most common bvFTD diagnostic criteria features questionably or definitely present in the 44 MBI/MCI participants were Apathy and Disinhibition, both at 30% (Within the early FTLD group: Apathy at 70% and Disinhibition at 72%). Neuropsychological testing deficits consistent with bvFTD were present in 27% (72%), and loss of empathy in 25% (72%). Impaired daily functioning was next at 16% (81%), Ritualistic behaviors were observed in 7%, (36%) and Hyperorality in 5% (33%). Chi‐squared tests revealed significant differences between the two groups for all features, with the largest numerical and statistical difference in impaired daily functioning.ConclusionApathy and Disinhibition were the most common neuropsychiatric symptoms noted in FLTD MBI/MCI. Development of impairments in daily functioning best distinguished the MBI/MCI and FTLD groups. This may be related to the requirement of functional impairment for the diagnosis of dementia. The relative frequency of different features in early dementia of genetic FTLD is similar to that reported in sporadic bvFTD. As more longitudinal data is collected, within‐subject assessment of the development of features in genetic bvFTD over time will be instructive.