Choudhury, Parichita

Abstract Cerebral white matter rarefaction (CWMR) was considered by Binswanger and Alzheimer to be due to cerebral arteriolosclerosis. Renewed attention came with CT and MR brain imaging, and neuropathological studies finding a high rate of CWMR in Alzheimer disease (AD). The relative contributions of cerebrovascular disease and AD to CWMR are still uncertain. In 1181 autopsies by the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND), large-format brain sections were used to grade CWMR and determine its vascular and neurodegenerative correlates. Almost all neurodegenerative diseases had more severe CWMR than the normal control group. Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that Braak neurofibrillary stage was the strongest predictor of CWMR, with additional independently significant predictors including age, cortical and diencephalic lacunar and microinfarcts, body mass index, and female sex. It appears that while AD and cerebrovascular pathology may be additive in causing CWMR, both may be solely capable of this. The typical periventricular pattern suggests that CWMR is primarily a distal axonopathy caused by dysfunction of the cell bodies of long-association corticocortical projection neurons. A consequence of these findings is that CWMR should not be viewed simply as “small vessel disease” or as a pathognomonic indicator of vascular cognitive impairment or vascular dementia.

AbstractBackgroundWe previously reported that in our autopsy‐confirmed cohort of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), DLB with parkinsonism (DLB+Park) predicted faster progression of UPDRS‐III scores compared to PDD, DLB without parkinsonism (DLB‐Park), and AD. This study examined annualized rate of change of UPDRS‐III subscales in our cohort.MethodsData included were from participants in Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases (AZSAND) with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n = 48), PDD (n = 98) or pure AD (n = 48), and longitudinal movement exams. Mixed effects model (accounting for age, education, and sex) was used to determine predicted mean UPDRS‐III and subscale scores (0‐4) for all groups. Individual UPDRS‐III subscale scores were derived for: Body Bradykinesia, Limb Bradykinesia, Gait, Postural Instability, Limb Rest Tremor, Neck Rigidity and Limb Rigidity. Where applicable, scores for multiple limbs involved were averaged.ResultsLongitudinal data was analyzed for over 1430‐participant years. Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB participants. PDD participants were more likely to be treated with dopaminergic agents (87.8%) compared to (p<0.001) DLB+Park (57.6%), DLB‐park (0%) and AD (2.1%). Frequency (29.4% vs. 29.0%) and severity (mean±SE = 0.4±0.07 and 0.4±0.12) of Limb Rest Tremor was similar for PDD and DLB+park. Limb Bradykinesia frequency and severity were PDD: 100%, 2.4±0.11, DLB+Park: 96.8%, 2.1±0.18, DLB‐Park: 20%, 0.4±0.23, and AD: 62%, 1.1±0.16. Frequency of gait abnormality was 98.5% in PDD, 90.3% in DLB+park, 60% in DLB‐Park and 57.8% in AD. Rigidity was most frequent in the PDD group (88.2%), followed by DLB+Park (71%), AD (19.6%), and none DLB‐park (0%). Over 8 years trajectories for limb bradykinesia and gait were greater for DLB+park than PDD (Figure 1, Cohen’s d range 0.89‐2.18 and 0.63‐1.99 over 8 years, p<0.001).ConclusionOur results suggest that DLB+Park group have faster motor progression predominantly related to gait abnormalities and limb bradykinesia. Future analyses will explore more convergent data, integrated effects of various measures and their differential contributions in this cohort.

AbstractBackgroundREM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) is a prodromal marker of α‐synucleinopathies with no standardized tool for assessing severity in clinical or research practice. RBD severity may have implications in measuring risk of phenoconversion, monitoring response to treatment and clinical trial design. This study assessed the validity of the RBD symptom severity scale (RBDSSS) and its correlation to the clinical global impression of severity (CGI‐S) in a cohort of participants enrolled in the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium.MethodParticipants and their bedpartners enrolled in the NAPS cohort filled out an 8‐item questionnaire, developed by the International RBD Study Group, assessing frequency and severity of dreams, vocalizations, movements, and injuries associated with RBD, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The CGI‐S is a 7‐point scale ranging from normal (1) to most severely ill (7) and was completed by a clinician based on an independent interview with the participant ± their bedpartners. Total scores for participant (RBDSSS‐PT) and bed partner (RBDSSS‐BP) questionnaires were derived by multiplying frequency and severity scores for each feature, then summing the products for possible maximum scores of 54 and 38 respectively.ResultThis cohort (n = 212) was predominantly male (82.5%) with a mean ± SE age of 65.16 ± 1.46 years. The median (interquartile range) for RBDSSS‐PT, RBDSSS‐BP and CGI‐S was 11 (4‐17), 8 (4‐14.3) and 3 (3‐4), respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rs) were as follows: RBDSSS‐PT vs. RBDSSS‐BP, rs = 0.579; RBDSSS‐PT vs. CGI‐S, rs = 0.642; RBDSSS‐BP vs. CGI‐S, rs = 0.487 (all P<0.0001). RBDSSS‐BP scores were significantly lower in women (6 vs. 9, Chi‐Square p = 0.009) while there were no differences in RBDSSS‐PT scores by sex. (9 vs. 11, p = 0.473).ConclusionA moderate correlation was observed between RBDSSS‐PT and RBDSSS‐BP suggesting good construct validity for the scale. CGI‐S correlated most with RBDSSS‐PT and had a weaker association with RBDSSS‐BP. Women had lower severity scores as reported by bed partners unlike their self‐reported scores, indicating possible sex differences in perceived RBD severity.

Abstract Introduction The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) symptom severity scale (RBDSSS) and its correlation to the clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) in a cohort of participants enrolled in the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) study. RBD is a prodromal marker of α-synucleinopathies with no standardized tool for assessing severity in clinical or research practice. Development of a reliable scale is essential to understand risk of phenoconversion and to monitor response to treatments, particularly in future neuroprotective clinical trials. Methods Participants and their bedpartners enrolled in the NAPS cohort filled out an 8-item questionnaire, developed by the International RBD Study Group, assessing frequency and severity of dreams, vocalizations, movements, and injuries associated with RBD, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale ranging from normal (1) to most severely ill (7) and was completed by a clinician based on an independent interview with the participant ± their bedpartners. Data was included when patient (RBDSSS-PT) and bedpartner (RBDSSS-BP) responses were both available. Total scores were derived by multiplying assigned point values for frequency and severity (for each question) and summing them for individual RBDSSS-PT scores (total possible=54) and RBDSSS-BP scores (total possible=38). Results This cohort (n=212) included in this analysis was predominantly male (n=175) with a mean ± SE age of 65.16 ± 1.46 years. The median (interquartile range) for RBDSSS-PT, RBDSSS-BP and CGI-S was 11 (4-17), 8 (4-14.3) and 3 (3-4), respectively. Non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rs) for each variable pair are as follows: RBDSSS-PT vs. RBDSSS-BP, rs=0.575; RBDSSS-PT vs. CGI-S, rs=0.641; RBDSSS-BP vs. CGI-S, rs=0.463 (P&lt;0.0001). Conclusion A moderate correlation was observed between RBDSSS-PT and RBDSSS-BP suggesting good construct validity for the scale. CGI-S correlated moderately with RBDSSS-PT and weakly with RBDSSS-BP. Future, larger studies are needed to explore this as a possible universal and clinically applicable scale for designation of RBD disease burden and prognostication. Support (If Any)

AbstractBackgroundAlthough parkinsonism is a core feature of Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), its evolution is less delineated. We aimed to assess differences in severity and progression of parkinsonian motor symptoms and signs in a community autopsy cohort with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB, PDD or Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).MethodData included were from 194 participants in the Arizona study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n=48), PDD (n=98) (±AD co‐pathology) or pure AD (n=48), and at least two movement exams performed by movement disorders subspecialists who classified PD and parkinsonism according to MDS‐UPDRS criteria. DLB was subgrouped by presence or absence of parkinsonism at final exam (DLB+Park and DLB–Park). Between group trajectory of UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were explored using piecewise‐linear and non‐linear MMRM multivariate analysis.ResultOver 1435 participant‐years of longitudinal data were included in the analyses (Figure 1). Mean±SD age at baseline movement exam and death were 76.0±7.5 and 83.4±6.8 years, respectively. At baseline, most participants did not have dementia or substantial motor abnormalities (except motor abnormalities in PDD). DLB (73.9%) and PDD (69.2%) groups had more males than AD (33.3%). Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB at last exam. Piecewise‐linear MMRM analysis showed baseline UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were highest (p<0.001) for PDD (mean±SE: 14.3±0.78 and 27.4±1.64), followed by DLB+Park (5.0±1.05 and 17.4±3.10), DLB‐Park (3.7±2.54 and 3.8±1.35) and AD (3.2±0.88 and 8.0±1.94). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐II was greatest for DLB+Park (1.44±0.20) and PDD (1.04±0.08), followed by DLB‐Park (0.89±0.18) and AD (0.30±0.11). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐III was highest for PDD and DLB+Park (2.12±0.20 vs 2.64±0.42), followed by DLB‐Park and AD (1.31 ± 0.38 and 0.64 ± 0.22). Preliminary non‐linear MMRM models (Figure 2) further supported substantial between group/subgroup differences in motor trajectories, and progression in DLB‐Park.ConclusionThese preliminary results in a large, well‐characterized clinicopathological community‐based autopsy cohort support that DLB+Park experience comparable, or greater, parkinsonian motor progression to PDD. Future modeling/sensitivity analyses will better delineate expected trajectories of motor progression to add prognostication value in clinic and design of DLB clinical trials.

AbstractBackgroundNeocortical tau can be present in over half of patients with Lewy body disease at autopsy, and may influence the timing of when a diagnosis of Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) can be made. We examined whether the core features, onset age and latency of probable DLB diagnosis differ by pathological subgroups.MethodAll patients (n=176) met clinical criteria for probable DLB, underwent autopsy and were classified as transitional or diffuse Lewy body disease (TLBD, DLBD). The TLBD and DLBD groups were further subdivided based on the absence of neocortical tangles represented by a low (L) Braak NFT stage of 0‐III or by the presence of neocortical tangles represented by a high (H) Braak NFT stage of IV‐VI. Onset age and latency from cognitive symptom onset to probable DLB were compared for TLBD‐L (n=30), DLBD‐L (n=47), DLBD‐H (n=78) and TLBD‐H (n=21).ResultThe TLBD‐H group met criteria for DLB at an older age (median 76 years) compared to TLBD‐L, DLBD‐L or DLBD‐H groups (median age 70 years, p<0.001). The latency to probable DLB from cognitive onset was shortest for TLBD‐L and DLBD‐L (median < 1 year), which was shorter than DLBD‐H (median 2 years; p=0.016), each of which were shorter than TLBD‐H (median 7.3 years; p<0.001). RBD was more common in men (79% men vs. 40% women, p<0.001) and in patients without neocortical tangles (86% vs. 57%, p<0.001). Patients with RBD met criteria for probable DLB at a younger age than those without a history of RBD (median 69 years vs. 76 years, p<0.001). Men had a shorter latency to probable DLB than women (median 1.0 year vs. 2.8 years, p<0.01), but this was related to RBD status that was more common in men.ConclusionPresence of RBD in both sexes led to a younger onset age and shorter latency to diagnosis of probable DLB. Patients with more widespread tau relative to α‐synuclein pathology (TLBD‐H) were older when probable DLB was diagnosed compared to those with so‐called pure Lewy body disease (TLBD‐L, DLBD‐L) or those with diffuse α‐synuclein and tau pathology (DLBD‐H).

AbstractIntroductionWe examined the temporal sequence of the core features in probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).MethodsIn 488 patients with probable DLB, the onset of each core feature and time to diagnosis was determined for men and women, and a pathologic subgroup (n = 209).ResultsREM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) developed before the other core features in men and women. Men were more likely to have RBD and were diagnosed with probable DLB earlier than women. Visual hallucinations developed after the other core features in men, but in women, they appeared earlier and concurrently with fluctuations and parkinsonism. Women were older and more cognitively impaired at first visit, were less likely to have RBD, more likely to be diagnosed with probable DLB later than men, and more likely to have neocortical tangles.DiscussionAn earlier latency to probable DLB was associated with men, RBD, and Lewy body disease without neocortical tangles.