Erlichman, Charles

3021 Background: 17DMAG is a water-soluble analog of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG), the first geldanamycin compound to enter clinical trials. 17DMAG causes oncoprotein degradation by binding to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) & has greater in-vitro activity than 17AAG. In animals treated with 17DMAG, liver toxicity is dose-limiting. The objectives of this first-in-human study are to: establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); recommend a phase 2 dose; & characterize the PK & PD of 17DMAG. Methods: Using a modified accelerated schema, escalating doses of 17DMAG are given IV over 1 h daily x 5 (schedule A) or daily x 3 (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Plasma 17DMAG concentrations during cycle 1 are quantitated by LC/MS. HSP70 & ILK levels in peripheral mononuclear cells are measured by western blot at baseline & 24 h on d 1. Results: 37 pts have been enrolled. On schedule A, dose levels are 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12 & 16 mg/m2/d (n = 20). On schedule B, the starting dose was 2.5 mg/m2/d. Based on safety information from schedule A, subsequent schedule B dose levels were 14, 19, 25 & 34 mg/m2/d (n = 17). One DLT was noted in schedule A (16 mg/m2) & consisted of reversible liver enzyme elevation. End-of-infusion (EOI) 17DMAG concentrations (33–2074 ng/ml) & AUC0–24 (200–5200 ng/ml x h) increase linearly with dose. Interpatient PK variability was substantial, with CV% of 16–59%. The daily administration schedule precluded precise definition of 17DMAG t1/2 & clearance, but estimates of t1/2 & clearance ranged from 10.8 to 77 h & 19–160 ml/min/m2, respectively. Between 0 & 24 h, 20.5 ± 8.6% (range 4–43.8%) of the administered dose was excreted in urine. HSP70 increased between 0.2 & 3.7 fold above baseline in PBMCs at 24 h at 12, 16, & 25 mg/m2. There is an indication of ILK degradation in 3 of 4 patients evaluated at 25 mg/m2. Conclusions: 17DMAG is well tolerated at current dose levels & maximal tolerated dose has not been reached. 17DMAG plasma PK are linear over the doses delivered to date, & there is evidence of a target effect as manifested by↑HSP70 & ↓ILK. Support: U01CA099168–01, U01CA62502, U01CA69912, R01CA90390 & NIH/NCCR/GCRC grants #5M01 RR 00056 & M01 RR00080 No significant financial relationships to disclose.

4504 Background: Treatment options for metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor receptor-β (PDGFR-β). Sorafenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β tyrosine kinase domains, is a rational targeted therapy to evaluate in NET. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ECOG PS = 2, = 1 prior chemotherapy, good organ function and signed informed consent. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide at a stable dose were allowed. Pts unable to take oral medications, with uncontrolled hypertension or with symptomatic coronary artery disease were excluded. Pts received sorafenib 400 mg po BID. Primary endpoint was response by RECIST in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. Results: 93 pts were enrolled: (50 CT, 43 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 4 of 41 (10%) CT pts and 4 of 41 (10%) ICC pts had a PR. There were 3 minor responses (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) in CT pts and 9 MRs in ICC pts for PR+MR rate of 17% for CT pts and 32% for ICC pts. For pts evaluable, 6-month progression-free survival was observed in 8/20 CT and 14/23 ICC pts. Grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 43% of pts, with skin (20%), GI (7%) and fatigue (9%) most common. Translational studies from tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Sorafenib at 400 mg po BID has modest activity in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, with frequent grade = 3 toxicity. Supported by NOI CM6225. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

3598 Background: Drug resistance to topotecan can be the result of BCRP/ABCG2 expression. BCRP is a member of the ABC transporter family that pumps anticancer drugs out of the cell. Lapatinib is a potent and selective dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR or ErbB1) and ErbB2 (Her2/Neu). 4-aminoquinazoline tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been shown to enhance the cytotoxicity of topotecan through inhibition of BCRP-mediated drug efflux in cancer cells. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with advanced stage cancers were enrolled at escalating dose levels of lapatinib and topotecan in cohorts IA, IB and IIB (MTD). Treatment schedule included lapatinib (750 - 1500 mg/d) daily for 21 (cohort IA) or 28 days (cohort IB) and topotecan (2.4 - 4.0 mg/ m2), days 1, 8 and 15; cycles were repeated every 28 days. Three patients were treated at each dose level, 18 on cohort IA, 9 on cohort IB and 10 at MTD (cohort IIB). Assessments of toxicity were performed with each cycle and clinical response was determined per RECIST criteria every other cycle. Results: The MTD for cohorts IA and IB was reached at a dose of 1250 mg of lapatinib and 3.2 mg/m2 of IV topotecan on days 1, 8 and 15. No DLT were seen during the dose escalation stage of cohorts IA and IB. Ten patients were enrolled at the MTD. There were no grade 4+ events. Thirteen grade 3+ events, considered to be related to treatment, were seen in 6 patients. The most common grade 3+ toxicities included dehydration (2) diarrhea (2), nausea (3), vomiting (2), neutropenia (1), thrombocytopenia (1), and fatigue (1). No abnormalities in left ventricular ejection fraction were noted. Stable disease was seen in 46% of the 37 patients. Conclusions: The combination of lapatinib and topotecan is a well-tolerated regimen. The MTD for the combination is lapatinib 1,250 mg orally once daily for 21 or 28 days and topotecan 3.2 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Pharmacokinetic analysis for drug interaction will be available for presentation at the meeting. Supported in part by GSK and Mayo Clinic No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Backgrounds B cell receptor (BCR) signals and microenvironment protection have been recognized to have key influences on CLL survival and activation. Akt activation is down-stream of the BCR signaling cascade and is critical in the mediation of the bi-directional interactions between CLL B-cells and bone marrow stroma. MK2206 is an allosteric Akt inhibitor previously tested for safety in solid tumor patients. Our preclinical data has demonstrated the synergy of MK2206 with bendamustine (B) to induce CLL apoptosis in vitro. MK2206 also abolished the signal activation and cytokine production induced by BCR ligation in CLL leukemic cells (Ding, ASH 2012). Therefore, we conducted a phase 1 trial testing the safety and efficacy of MK2206 in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods A phase 1 dose-escalation study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as well as the safety and efficacy of 3 dose levels (90 mg or 135 mg or 200 mg weekly) of the oral Akt inhibitor MK2206 in combination with bendamustine (70 mg/m2 daily for 2 days in each cycle) and rituximab (cycle 1: 375 mg/m2, cycle 2-6: 500 mg/m2) therapy in relapse/refractory CLL patients. To test the targeting efficacy of MK2206 on Akt and downstream signals, we designed a one-week “run-in” of single agent MK2206 before the initiation of BR during cycle 1. MK2206 was then given along with BR on day 1 of cycles 2-6. Tumor response was evaluated 2 months after the 6th/last cycle of therapy based on IWCLL 2008 criteria. Correlative laboratory studies included assessment of Akt signaling and the plasma cytokine levels (multiplex beads assay (Invitrogen)) at baseline and after one week of first dose of single agent MK2206. Results Nine patients (median age 68) were enrolled in the phase I portion of this trial. All 9 patients had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region genes (IGHV) and 4 had del(11q). Six had received prior chemoimmunotherapy (CIT: FCR or PCR or PCO) and 5 had high risk disease defined as early progression within 26 months of the last CIT. Three had received alemtuzumab containing regimen. We have observed potent lymphocyte mobilization in all evaluated patients (n=7) after one-dose of MK2206 during week 1 (mean increase ALC: 35%) as well as reductions of plasma CCL3, CCL4 and CCL2 in the majority of the patients. A single dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia and hemolytic anemia) was observed at dose level 1 (90 mg weekly) among 6 patients treated at this dose. Two patients with dose-limiting toxicities at dose level 2 (135 mg weekly) were observed where one patient had a rash and one patient had dehydration and febrile neutropenia among three patients treated at this dose. Accordingly, the 90 mg once weekly dose was determined to be the MTD for phase 2 trial testing. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed to date were neutropenia (44%) including febrile neutropenia (22%), rash (22%), diarrhea (22%), nausea and vomiting (11%), dehydration (11%), hemolytic anemia (11%) and thrombocytopenia (11%). The frequency of cytopenias was similar to the published German experience with BR (50% grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities compared to 44% in N1087) in relapsed CLL patients (Fischer, JCO 2011). The median number of cycles received was 6 (range 1-6). Using an intent to treat analysis, two patients achieved complete response (CR, n= 2, 22%), one patient achieved nodular partial response (nPR, n=1, 11%) and five patients achieved a partial response (PR, n=5, 56%). The overall response rate (ORR) is 89%. Conclusion The Akt inhibitor MK2206 in combination with BR is well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Single dose of MK2206 inhibits Akt phosphorylation, mobilizes leukemic cells and decreases plasma cytokines involved in BCR signals. The preliminary efficacy of this combination demonstrated promising results with a 89% ORR and 22% CR albeit in the small phase 1 cohort. These results compare favorably to BR alone (9% CR and 59% ORR) in relapsed/refractory CLL patients. Phase 2 testing of this combination is now underway. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the funding from NCI grant K23CA160345 (WD), NCI grant CA95241 (NEK) and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (CA025224 and CA33601). Disclosures: Off Label Use: MK2206, used in a phase 1 trial of relapsed CLL disease. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding. Zent:Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxSmithKline: Research Funding; Biothera: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech : Research Funding. Reeder:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 4954 Background Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains incurable with current approaches and newer therapies targeting the abnormal disease biology need to be developed. The malignant plasma cell is highly dependent on the marrow microenvironment, which promotes tumor cell proliferation as well as survival. There is increased bone marrow vascular density in patients with MM and the degree of neo-angiogenesis appear to be prognostic in this disease. Studies have also shown that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is intricately involved in the interaction between the marrow microenvironment and the myeloma cell. These findings suggested that the VEGF pathway may be a valuable target for therapeutic approach in this disease. Patients and Methods We designed a phase 2 trial of Sunitinib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had received less than three prior therapies. Sunitinib malate (SU11248; Sutent) is a novel, multi-targeted, small molecule inhibitor of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1), -2, and -3, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) -α and -β. The treatment consisted of Sunitinib 37.5 mg given daily in a continuous fashion in six-week cycles. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE response version 3.0 and responses were assessed according to the International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria. Response rate of single agent Sunitinib was the primary endpoint of the study. Results 13 patients were accrued between July of 2007 and April 2009 before the study was closed. The median age of the study population was 61 years (range, 53 - 84), and included nine females (69%). The median time from diagnosis to registration was 39.2 months (range, 4.5 - 88) and 10 patients had received previous stem cell transplant. Previous therapy included lenalidomide in 7 patients, thalidomide in 5 patients and bortezomib in 2 patients. All 13 patients were alive at last follow up with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (range, 1.3 -21.2). All patients have gone off study, disease progression being the most common cause (9 patients), followed by adverse events (3 pts) and alternate treatment in the remaining patient. A hematological grade 3 or higher adverse event was documented in 6 patients and a grade 3 or higher non-hematological adverse event was seen in 8 patients. A grade 3 or higher neutropenia was observed in 5 pts and thrombocytopenia in 2 pts. Fatigue was common and was seen in 11 pts. The median number of cycles administered was one (range, 1-5) and the total number of cycles across 13 patients was 22. Treatment delays or interruptions were seen in five and six patients respectively. The most common reason for treatment delays was hematologic adverse events. No responses (PR or better) were seen, and stable disease was seen in eight of the 13 patients as the best response. The median time to progression was 2.9 months. Conclusions Single agent Sunitinib has no clinically relevant efficacy in this group of patients with relapsed myeloma with one or two previous therapies. Hematological toxicity was higher than anticipated. Whereas these results indicate that VEGFR TK inhibitors are not active in previously treated myeloma, it does not preclude the possibility that VEGF targeting strategies may enhance the efficacy of other therapies. Disclosures Kumar: CELGENE: Research Funding; MILLENNIUM: Research Funding; BAYER: Research Funding; GENZYME: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Purpose: Flavopiridol is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against multiple myeloma cells in vitro and ex vivo. It can induce apoptosis in non-cycling human cell lines, including RPMI-8226, a myeloma cell line. Suggested mechanisms of cytotoxicity include down regulation of anti-apoptotic regulators, direct binding to duplex DNA, disruption of transcription factor/DNA binding, upregulation of p53, inhibition of transcription, and inhibition of angiogenesis. A Phase II multicenter trial was conducted to determine the activity of flavopiridol in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Experimental Design: Eighteen patients were treated with 1 hour flavopiridol infusions (50 mg/m(2)/day) for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Responses were assessed according to IBMTR criteria each cycle. Serial bone marrow aspirates were collected before and immediately after flavopiridol treatment to measure in vivo and ex vivo effects of flavopiridol on patient plasma cells. Immunoblotting for Mcl-1, Bcl-2, p53, cyclin D, phosphoRNA polymerase II and phosphoSTAT 3 was conducted on total cellular proteins isolated from sorted plasma/myeloma cells. Ex vivo assessment of flavopiridol sensitivity of freshly collected myeloma cells was performed for 5 patients pre-therapy. Results: Median age of patients ranged from 49 to 81 years, with a median of 65 years. Patients had received a median of 3 (range, 1–5) treatment regimens prior to enrollment. Sixty-one percent of patients were refractory to prior therapy and fifty-five percent had received prior high dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell support. The immunoglobulin isotypes of the patients were as follows: IgG (10), IgA (4), light chain (3), and non-secretory (1). At enrollment, 13 patients had a beta-2 microglobulin greater than 3.5. Seven had a plasma cell labeling index greater than or equal to 1%. Four had an elevated LDH. The trial was stopped at time of interim analysis due to a lack of clinical efficacy. Of eighteen treated patients, 15 progressed (including 1 death on study) and 3 discontinued due to toxicity. All patients have ended the active treatment phase, and the mean number of cycles administered for all enrolled patients was 1.6 cycles (range 1–3). No objective responses were observed. The most frequent adverse events were leukopenia and diarrhea (83% each), followed by thrombocytopenia, nausea, and fatigue (61% each). Ex vivo flavopiridol treatment of pre-therapy patient plasma/myeloma cells led to cytotoxicity, but only after longer exposure times at higher flavopiridol concentrations than were anticipated to be achieved in vivo. Further, immunoblotting demonstrated no indication that known in vitro cellular effects of flavopiridol were recapitulated in vivo. Conclusions: Flavopiridol has little single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma when administered at this dose and schedule, which is likely due to the inability to achieve biologically relevant concentrations in patients. .

Abstract Abstract 2862 Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a B-cell malignancy that exhibits significant intratumoral infiltration by non-malignant T lymphocytes. The pathophysiological significance of infiltrating T cells is poorly understood but recent studies have suggested that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells are highly represented in lymph nodes involved by FL. These Treg cells display the ability to suppress the proliferation and cytokine production of other tumor-infiltrating T cells and migrate to areas of B-cell lymphoma in response to chemotactic signals provided by the malignant B-cells. Denileukin diftitox, a chimeric immunotoxin composed of the modified cytotoxic domain of diphtheria toxin and human interleukin-2 (IL-2) protein, targets cells expressing CD25 and has proven efficacy in patients with relapsed B-cell lymphoma. In this study, we combined denileukin diftitox with rituximab in a cohort of previously untreated, advanced-stage follicular lymphoma patients. Our hypothesis was that denileukin diftitox would deplete the Treg cells, thereby removing the inhibition of the immune response, and rituximab would deplete the B-cells thereby preventing further recruitment of Treg cells to the areas of lymphoma. Between August 2008 and March 2010, twenty-four patients with stage III and IV follicular grade 1 or 2 non-Hodgkin lymphoma were accrued to the study. One patient died before treatment was given and is not included in the analysis. The median age was 60 years (range: 27 – 79), 12 (52%) of the patients were male, 19 (83%) had a PS of 0 and 4 (17%) had a PS of 1. Based on the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), 3 (13%) were low risk, 14 (61%) were intermediate risk and 6 (26%) were high risk. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and denileukin diftitox 18 mcg/kg/day on days 1–5 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. A median of 4 cycles of therapy was given (range: 1 – 4). Thirteen patients completed treatment per protocol (57%), however 5 patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (22%), 2 refused further treatment (9%) and 1 discontinued due to disease progression (4%). Nine of the 23 patients (39%; 95% CI: 21–61%) responded to treatment, 3 (13%) had a complete response and 6 (26%) had a partial response. Twenty-one patients (91%) are alive with a median follow-up of 8.7 months (range: 3.4–19.5). Seven (30%) patients have progressed and two (8.7%) has died. The median time to progression is 13.4 months (95% CI: 10.4 – NA). The combination, however, was associated with significant toxicity. Thirteen patients (57%) experienced grade 3 or greater adverse events. Six patients (26%) had symptoms of capillary leak syndrome, 1 of whom died. In correlative studies performed on the peripheral blood, the number of CD25+ T-cells decreased after treatment when compared to pretreatment numbers (median 24%; range: 8–44%). We conclude that while the addition of denileukin diftitox to rituximab decreased the numbers of CD25+ T-cells, denileukin diftitox contributed significantly to the toxicity of the combination. Furthermore, the overall response rate and time to progression in this study were no better than what would be expected in follicular lymphoma patients treated with rituximab alone. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is an essential component of the B-cell receptor signaling pathway, a pathway critical to the survival and proliferation of malignant B cells. Ibrutinib, a small molecule inhibitor of BTK, has shown significant activity in several B-cell malignancies and is currently FDA approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with CLL or mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior treatment.In a Phase 1 dose-escalation study, ibrutinib induced a response in 6 (38%) of 16 patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory FL and 6/11 (54%) of pts treated at doses ≥ 2.5 mg/kg (Advani JCO 2013, Fowler ASH abstr 156:2012). 560 mg daily was identified as a well-tolerated dose in lymphoma resulting in full-target occupancy. On the basis of these results, the Mayo Clinic and Princess Margaret P2Cs conducted a CTEP-sponsored Phase 2 trial of single-agent ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory FL (NCI 9271). Methods: Eligible pts had relapsed or refractory FL (Gr 1, 2, or 3a) that had progressed during or after 1 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. Therapy consisted of ibrutinib, 560 mg daily, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed by CT at 8 weeks and then every 12 weeks. All pts were required to have an on-study biopsy and a second biopsy at progression after response with fresh tissue collected for correlative studies. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints were safety and tolerability, overall survival, time to response, time to treatment failure, duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS). Planned exploratory correlative studies included C1D8 and C3D1 FDG-PET response evaluation in a subset of 20 patients, and whole-transcriptome sequencing for correlation of mutations with response and resistance. Results: 40 patients (38 evaluable for response) were accrued from April 2013 to April 2014. Median age was 64 years (range 46-82), 70% were men, 55% had FLIPI ≥ 3, median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1-11), 20% had a prior stem cell transplant, 45% were rituximab refractory, and 36% were refractory to their most recent treatment. At a median follow-up of 6.5 months (mo) (range 1.8-14.6+), the ORR for the 40 intention-to-treat pts is 30% (95% CI: 17-47%) with 1 CR and 11 PRs by CT criteria (4/12 responders had a negative restaging PET/CT). 26 (65%) patients have exhibited tumor size reduction. Only 2/18 (11%) pts with rituximab-refractory disease responded, compared to 8/19 (42%) pts with rituximab-sensitive disease (P=0.06) and 2/3 who were rituximab-naïve. There was no correlation between response and number of prior regimens. Median time to response was 2.4 mo (range 1.8-12.9 mo). Median PFS is 9.9 mo (95% CI: 6 mo, not reached). One of 12 responders has progressed after 9.9 mo on treatment. Median treatment duration was 5 mo (range 1-15+ mo). Dose delays (2 pts) and reductions were infrequent (4 pts). 17 pts have discontinued treatment due to PD (12), refusal (2), AEs (2), and death (1). Gr 3-4 AEs occurred in 30% of pts, including the following AEs in more than 1 pt: anemia (2), neutropenia (3), and infection (2). 3 pts have died (1 PD, 1 pneumonia, 1 gastric hemorrhage). Of the 20 pts with C1D8 PET scans, 19 also had C3D1 PET scans and were evaluable for response. Six of these 19 pts had objective responses by CT criteria at week 8 or beyond. Of the 6 responders, C1D8 PET/CT showed qualitative (visual) improvement in 3 pts, no visual change in 1 pt, and qualitative worsening in 2 pts. On the C3D1 PET/CT, 4 of 6 had qualitative improvement and 2 had no change. Evaluation of quantitative PET data including SUVs and total lesion glycolysis is ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions: Single agent ibrutinib is well tolerated with a modest ORR in relapsed/refractory FL at this early assessment. Continued follow-up is warranted to capture late responders and to establish response duration. Ibrutinib appears less active in FL than in MCL and CLL. Early PET scans (C1D8) do not reliably predict for response. Support by N01-CM-2011-00099 Disclosures Bartlett: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; ImaginAb: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: PF-05082566 for B-NHL. Kuruvilla:Janssen: Honoraria. Reeder:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is a progressive and fatal myeloproliferative disorder with limited therapeutic options. R115777 is a non-peptidomimetic enzyme-specific inhibitor of farnesyl protein transferase (FT) which we recently reported has in vitro activity against aberrant myeloid progenitors from MMM patients (Leukemia2003;17:849). This observation, coupled with the clinical activity demonstrated in high risk acute myeloid leukemia (Blood2001;97:3361) and chronic myeloid disorders (Blood2003;101:1692) led us to perform a Phase II trial in patients (pts) with MMM. Methods: Eligible pts had histologically confirmed MMM and were symptomatic, defined by anemia (hemoglobin<10g/dL or transfusion dependent) or palpable hepatosplenomegaly. Pts received 300 mg of R115777 orally twice daily for the first 21 days of a 28 day cycle. Dose escalations (up to 1200mg/day) and reductions (down to 100mg/day) were allowed based on activity and toxicity. The primary endpoint was response as defined by improvement in either anemia or organomegaly. Results: 34 pts (median age 65 yrs, range 55–80; 71% male) were enrolled in the trial. All pts displayed symptomatic disease at enrollment, with 10 who were erythrocyte transfusion dependent; and 19 (56%) had a Lille MMM prognostic score ≥1; no pts were significantly thrombocytopenic at entry by enrollment criteria. Median pre-study spleen and liver sizes were 12 cm (range: 0–35) and 2 cm (range: 0–15) below the left and right costal margin, respectively. Median time to discontinuation of therapy was 5.5 months (95% CI:2.9–6.4). Reasons for early termination were progression (7), adverse reactions (5), co-morbidities (2), refusal of further treatment (2), and death on study (1). One pt died of grade 5 pneumonitis two weeks after study enrollment, which was felt to be unrelated to study treatment. Significant toxicities (≥ grade 3) were seen for myelosuppression (n=13), neuropathy (n=2), fatigue (n=1), rash (n=1) and hyponatremia (n=1). Overall, R115777 resulted in little improvement in anemia, with the exception of one anemia-based partial response. However, the myelosuppressive aspects of the agent may have masked improvements in cytopenias. In contrast, R115777 did result in clinically relevant decreases in organomegaly in 11 pts (33%) (splenomegaly in 3 pts, hepatomegaly in 5 pts, and both in an additional 3 pts.) Across all pts who had some reduction in splenomegaly, the median maximal reduction was 42.5% (of palpable component; range: 8–100%). Likewise, all patients with baseline hepatomegaly had resolution of this problem at some point during therapy. Four pts remain on the agent (from 14 to 22 months) for continued and sustained improvement in organomegaly. Responses observed did not significantly correlate with reductions in bone marrow fibrosis, osteosclerosis, neoangiogenesis, or resolution of baseline karyotypic abnormalities. Conclusions: R115777 has demonstrated preliminary activity against MMM associated organomegaly. Whether this latter benefit is independent of R115777 induced myelosuppression is unclear. The myelosuppression observed was generally mild and without clinical consequence, although it was difficult to differentiate between myelosuppression versus disease progression. Pts continue to be followed to evaluate durability of observed responses, long term effects on anemia and intramedullary manifestations of the disease.

Abstract Abstract 76 Background: We measured proliferation in MM cells transfected with 13,984 small interfering RNAs in the absence/presence of increasing concentrations of bortezomib (BTZ) and identified 37 non lethal genes as reproducible BTZ sensitizers. The strongest hit was CDK5 a gene expressed at high levels in MM and neural tissues with relatively low expression in other organs suggesting a large therapeutic window. The small molecule CDK5 inhibitor Dinaciclib is a novel, potent, small molecule inhibitor of cyclin dependent kinases (CDK). It selectively inhibits CDK1, CDK 2, CDK 5 and CDK9 with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) in the low nanomolar concentration. Based on these data, we undertook the current trial to evaluate the maximally tolerated dose of Dinaciclib in this patient population as well as assess the efficacy of single agent Dinaciclib in relapsed MM. Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed MM and measurable disease were enrolled on this phase 1/2 trial provided they had not more than 4 prior lines of therapy for MM, had adequate performance status and organ and hematological function. Patients receiving strong inhibitors/inducers of CYP3A4 were not allowed unless the drugs could be discontinued. The primary objectives were to (i) to determine the MTD of dinaciclib in subjects with relapsed MM (phase 1) and (ii) to evaluate the confirmed response rate with dinaciclib in patients with relapsed MM (phase 2). Dinaciclib was administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle at doses of 30–50 mg/m2. Dose escalation was done using a 3+3 design and MTD was defined as one dose level below that resulted in >=2 DLTs among 6 patients. Results: Overall, twenty-nine patients were accrued to this study (19 phase I, 10 phase II) from July 2009 to December 2011. Two patients were replaced for study violations and are not included in analysis. The Phase II analysis included the 6 patients treated at the Phase I dose level 50mg/m2 as well as the first 9 patients accrued to the Phase II portion (15 evaluable patients). The median age of the 27 evaluable patients was 66 (range, 49–81); 52% were male. The median duration from diagnosis was 42 months (range, 7–207 months); median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1–5). Overall, 11 (41%) patients were considered high-risk by FISH and 56% were ISS stage III at study entry. Patients have received a median of 2 cycles (range: 1–12) and all patients have discontinued treatment for disease progression (18), alternative Treatment (2), adverse Event (4), or other reasons (3). One dose limiting toxicity was seen over all dose levels. One patient at 40 mg/m2 experienced grade 3 constipation possibly related to treatment. The dose level of 50 mg/m2 was determined to be the MTD for the Phase II portion. The overall confirmed response rate was 3 of 27 (11%); including two patients at 40 mg/m2 dose (1 VGPR, 1 PR) and one patient at 50 mg/m2 dose (1 VGPR) with a PR or better. In addition, two patients at 50 mg/mg2 dose have achieved an MR; translating to an overall response rate of 18.5% (5 of 27). Figure 1 shows a waterfall plot of the M protein responses among patients with a measurable M spike. Overall, 21 patients had disease progression and 14 patients have died. Median follow-up for patients still alive is 11.8 months (range: 6.5–19.3). Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common hematological AEs, and gastrointestinal symptoms, alopecia, and fatigue, were the most common non-hematological AEs seen in the study. Conclusions: The current study demonstrates potential single agent anti-myeloma activity of dinaciclib in a relapsed MM patient population with 2 patients achieving a deep response (VGPR) and many patients obtaining some degree of M protein stabilization or decrease. Ongoing studies are examining dinaciclib in combination with proteasome inhibitors, exploring both weekly and every three-week dosing schedules. Disclosures: Zonder: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.