Phase I, pharmacokinetic (PK), & pharmacodynamic (PD) study of 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, (17DMAG, NSC 707545) in patients with advanced solid tumors
3021 Background: 17DMAG is a water-soluble analog of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG), the first geldanamycin compound to enter clinical trials. 17DMAG causes oncoprotein degradation by binding to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) & has greater in-vitro activity than 17AAG. In animals treated with 17DMAG, liver toxicity is dose-limiting. The objectives of this first-in-human study are to: establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); recommend a phase 2 dose; & characterize the PK & PD of 17DMAG. Methods: Using a modified accelerated schema, escalating doses of 17DMAG are given IV over 1 h daily x 5 (schedule A) or daily x 3 (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Plasma 17DMAG concentrations during cycle 1 are quantitated by LC/MS. HSP70 & ILK levels in peripheral mononuclear cells are measured by western blot at baseline & 24 h on d 1. Results: 37 pts have been enrolled. On schedule A, dose levels are 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12 & 16 mg/m2/d (n = 20). On schedule B, the starting dose was 2.5 mg/m2/d. Based on safety information from schedule A, subsequent schedule B dose levels were 14, 19, 25 & 34 mg/m2/d (n = 17). One DLT was noted in schedule A (16 mg/m2) & consisted of reversible liver enzyme elevation. End-of-infusion (EOI) 17DMAG concentrations (33–2074 ng/ml) & AUC0–24 (200–5200 ng/ml x h) increase linearly with dose. Interpatient PK variability was substantial, with CV% of 16–59%. The daily administration schedule precluded precise definition of 17DMAG t1/2 & clearance, but estimates of t1/2 & clearance ranged from 10.8 to 77 h & 19–160 ml/min/m2, respectively. Between 0 & 24 h, 20.5 ± 8.6% (range 4–43.8%) of the administered dose was excreted in urine. HSP70 increased between 0.2 & 3.7 fold above baseline in PBMCs at 24 h at 12, 16, & 25 mg/m2. There is an indication of ILK degradation in 3 of 4 patients evaluated at 25 mg/m2. Conclusions: 17DMAG is well tolerated at current dose levels & maximal tolerated dose has not been reached. 17DMAG plasma PK are linear over the doses delivered to date, & there is evidence of a target effect as manifested by↑HSP70 & ↓ILK. Support: U01CA099168–01, U01CA62502, U01CA69912, R01CA90390 & NIH/NCCR/GCRC grants #5M01 RR 00056 & M01 RR00080 No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, an Inhibitor of Heat-Shock Protein 90, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Purpose To define the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17DMAG). Methods 17DMAG was given intravenously over 1 hour daily for 5 days (schedule A) or daily for 3 days (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Plasma 17DMAG concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) and client proteins were evaluated at baseline and after treatment on day 1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and in pre- and post-treatment (24 hours) biopsies done during cycle 1 at the recommended phase II dose (n = 7). Results Fifty-six patients were entered: 26 on schedule A; 30 on schedule B. The recommended phase II doses for schedules A and B were 16 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included liver function test elevation (14%), pneumonitis (9%), diarrhea (4%), nausea (4%), fatigue (4%) and thrombocytopenia (4%). There were no objective responses. Four patients had stable disease. 17DMAG half-life was 24 ± 15 hours. 17DMAG area under the curve (range, 0.7 to 14.7 mg/mL × h) increased linearly with dose. The median HSP90, HSP70, and integrin-linked kinase levels were 87.5% (n = 14), 124% (n = 20), and 99.5% (n = 20) of baseline. Changes in HSPs and client proteins in tumor biopsies were not consistent between baseline and 24 hours nor did they change in the same direction as those in PBMCs collected at the time of biopsy. Conclusion The recommended phase II doses of 17DMAG (16 mg/m2 × 5 days or 25 mg/m2 × 3 days, every 3 weeks) are well tolerated and suitable for further evaluation.
Cisplatin abrogates the geldanamycin-induced heat shock response
Abstract Benzoquinone ansamycin antibiotics such as geldanamycin (GA) bind to the NH2-terminal ATP-binding domain of heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 and inhibit its chaperone functions. Despite in vitro and in vivo studies indicating promising antitumor activity, derivatives of GA, including 17-allylaminogeldanamycin (17-AAG), have shown little clinical efficacy as single agents. Thus, combination studies of 17-AAG and several cancer chemotherapeutics, including cisplatin (CDDP), have begun. In colony-forming assays, the combination of CDDP and GA or 17-AAG was synergistic and caused increased apoptosis compared with each agent alone. One measurable response that results from treatment with Hsp90-targeted agents is the induction of a heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1) heat shock response. Treatment with GA + CDDP revealed that CDDP suppresses up-regulation of HSF-1 transcription, causing decreased levels of stress-inducible proteins such as Hsp27 and Hsp70. However, CDDP treatment did not prevent trimerization and nuclear localization of HSF-1 but inhibited DNA binding of HSF-1 as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Melphalan, but not camptothecin, caused similar inhibition of GA-induced HSF-1–mediated Hsp70 up-regulation. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium salt cell survival assays revealed that deletion of Hsp70 caused increased sensitivity to GA (Hsp70+/+ IC50 = 63.7 ± 14.9 nmol/L and Hsp70−/− IC50 = 4.3 ± 2.9 nmol/L), which confirmed that a stress response plays a critical role in decreasing GA sensitivity. Our results suggest that the synergy of GA + CDDP is due, in part, to CDDP-mediated abrogation of the heat shock response through inhibition of HSF-1 activity. Clinical modulation of the HSF-1–mediated heat shock response may enhance the efficacy of Hsp90-directed therapy. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(10):3256–64]
P-Glycoprotein–Mediated Resistance to Hsp90-Directed Therapy Is Eclipsed by the Heat Shock Response
Abstract Despite studies that show the antitumor activity of Hsp90 inhibitors, such as geldanamycin (GA) and its derivative 17-allylamino-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG), recent reports indicate that these inhibitors lack significant single-agent clinical activity. Resistance to Hsp90 inhibitors has been previously linked to expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and the multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype. However, the stress response induced by GA treatment can also cause resistance to Hsp90-targeted therapy. Therefore, we chose to further investigate the relative importance of P-gp and the stress response in 17-AAG resistance. Colony-forming assays revealed that high expression of P-gp could increase the 17-AAG IC50 6-fold in cells transfected with P-gp compared with parent cells. A549 cells selected for resistance to GA overexpressed P-gp, but verapamil did not reverse the resistance. These cells also overexpressed Hsp27, and Hsp70 was induced with 17-AAG treatment. When the GA and 17-AAG resistant cells were transfected with Hsp27 and/or Hsp70 small interfering RNA (siRNA), the 17-AAG IC50 decreased 10-fold compared with control transfected cells. Transfection with siRNA directed against Hsp27, Hsp70, or Hsp27 and Hsp70 also increased sensitivity to EC78, a purine scaffold-based Hsp90 inhibitor that is not a P-gp substrate. We conclude that P-gp may contribute, in part, to resistance to 17-AAG, but induction of stress response proteins, such as Hsp27 and Hsp70, by Hsp90-targeted therapy plays a larger role. Taken together, our results indicate that targeting of Hsp27 and Hsp70 should be exploited to increase the clinical efficacy of Hsp90-directed therapy. [Cancer Res 2008;68(18):7419–27]
HER receptor signaling confers resistance to the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor inhibitor, BMS-536924
Abstract We have reported previously the activity of the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-IR)/insulin receptor (InsR) inhibitor, BMS-554417, in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. Further studies indicated treatment of OV202 ovarian cancer cells with BMS-554417 increased phosphorylation of HER-2. In addition, treatment with the pan-HER inhibitor, BMS-599626, resulted in increased phosphorylation of IGF-IR, suggesting a reciprocal cross-talk mechanism. In a panel of five ovarian cancer cell lines, simultaneous treatment with the IGF-IR/InsR inhibitor, BMS-536924 and BMS-599626, resulted in a synergistic antiproliferative effect. Furthermore, combination therapy decreased AKT and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and increased biochemical and nuclear morphologic changes consistent with apoptosis compared with either agent alone. In response to treatment with BMS-536924, increased expression and activation of various members of the HER family of receptors were seen in all five ovarian cancer cell lines, suggesting that inhibition of IGF-IR/InsR results in adaptive up-regulation of the HER pathway. Using MCF-7 breast cancer cell variants that overexpressed HER-1 or HER-2, we then tested the hypothesis that HER receptor expression is sufficient to confer resistance to IGF-IR-targeted therapy. In the presence of activating ligands epidermal growth factor or heregulin, respectively, MCF-7 cells expressing HER-1 or HER-2 were resistant to BMS-536924 as determined in a proliferation and clonogenic assay. These data suggested that simultaneous treatment with inhibitors of the IGF-I and HER family of receptors may be an effective strategy for clinical investigations of IGF-IR inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancer and that targeting HER-1 and HER-2 may overcome clinical resistance to IGF-IR inhibitors. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(9):2589–98]
Up-regulation of Heat Shock Protein 27 Induces Resistance to 17-Allylamino-Demethoxygeldanamycin through a Glutathione-Mediated Mechanism
Abstract 17-Allylamino-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG), currently in phase I and II clinical trials as an anticancer agent, binds to the ATP pocket of heat shock protein (Hsp90). This binding induces a cellular stress response that up-regulates many proteins including Hsp27, a member of the small heat shock protein family that has cytoprotective roles, including chaperoning of cellular proteins, regulation of apoptotic signaling, and modulation of oxidative stress. Therefore, we hypothesized that Hsp27 expression may affect cancer cell sensitivity to 17-AAG. In colony-forming assays, overexpression of Hsp27 increased cell resistance to 17-AAG whereas down-regulation of Hsp27 by siRNA increased sensitivity. Because Hsp27 is known to modulate levels of glutathione (GSH), we examined cellular levels of GSH and found that it was decreased in cells transfected with Hsp27 siRNA when compared with control siRNA. Treatment with buthionine sulfoximine, an inhibitor of GSH synthesis, also sensitized cells to 17-AAG. Conversely, treatment of Hsp27 siRNA–transfected cells with N-acetylcysteine, an antioxidant and GSH precursor, reversed their sensitivity to 17-AAG. A cell line selected for stable resistance to geldanamycin relative to parent cells showed increased Hsp27 expression. When these geldanamycin- and 17-AAG-resistant cells were transfected with Hsp27 siRNA, 17-AAG resistance was dramatically diminished. Our results suggest that Hsp27 up-regulation has a significant role in 17-AAG resistance, which may be mediated in part through GSH regulation. Clinical modulation of GSH may therefore enhance the efficacy of Hsp90-directed therapy. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(22): 10967-75)