Back to Authors

Saxena, Abhiraj

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7338-2269

Mayo Clinic

Thomas Jefferson University

Citations 2

Comparative Estimation of Long-Term Graft Patency Rates After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Fredericks, Tia, Nasher, Nayeem , Pritting, Christopher , Saxena, Abhiraj , Slota, Paul A., Ahmad, Danial , Saran, Nishant , Stulak, John M., Rahimov, Daler , Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang

Cardiology in Review | November 14, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/crd.0000000000001091 Get It

We sought to characterize the long-term patency of various graft types in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. A comprehensive literature search identified 139 studies including 56,827 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The mean patient age was 62 years (95% confidence interval: 60–63), and 80% (95% confidence interval: 79–82) were male. Patency outcomes were analyzed for each graft type, and parametric extrapolation was performed based on mean patency and mean follow-up time per conduit. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) demonstrated the highest mean patency at 96% with a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, followed by the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) at 94% (2.8 years), gastroepiploic artery (GEA) at 93% (1.7 years), and radial artery (RA) at 89% (3.7 years). The saphenous vein graft had the lowest mean patency at 82% with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Extrapolated 20-year patency rates were 77% for LIMA, 64% for RIMA, 54% for RA, 42% for GEA, and 33% for saphenous vein graft. Arterial grafts demonstrated superior long-term patency compared to vein grafts. LIMA remains the primary conduit of choice, while RIMA, followed by RA and GEA, may be appropriate secondary arterial conduits depending on patient-specific factors. Vein grafts had the poorest long-term patency.
Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Giant Cell Myocarditis: A Systematic Review
Saxena, Abhiraj , Wood, Chelsey T. , O’Malley, Thomas J. , Maynes, Elizabeth J. , Massey, H. Todd , Pirlamarla, Preethi , Alvarez, René , Cooper, Leslie T. , Rame, J. Eduardo , O'Malley, Thomas J , Cooper, Leslie T , Patel, Preeyal M. , Entwistle, John W. , Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang

Journal of Clinical Medicine | December 1, 2020 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3905

10.3390/jcm9123905 Get It

Treatment of giant cell myocarditis (GCM) can require bridging to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) or recovery with mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Since the roles of MCS and immunotherapy are not well-defined in GCM, we sought to analyze outcomes of patients with GCM who required MCS. A systematic search was performed in June 2019 to identify all studies of biopsy-proven GCM requiring MCS after 2009. We identified 27 studies with 43 patients. Patient-level data were extracted for analysis. Median patient age was 45 (interquartile range (IQR): 32–57) years. 42.1% (16/38) were female. 34.9% (15/43) presented in acute heart failure. 20.9% (9/43) presented in cardiogenic shock. Biventricular (BiVAD) MCS was required in 76.7% (33/43) of cases. Of the 62.8% (27/43) of patients who received immunotherapy, 81.5% (22/27) used steroids combined with at least one other immunosuppressant. Cyclosporine was the most common non-steroidal agent, used in 40.7% (11/27) of regimens. Immunosuppression was initiated before MCS in 59.3% (16/27) of cases, after MCS in 29.6% (8/27), and not specified in 11.1% (3/27). Immunosuppression started prior to MCS was associated with significantly better survival than MCS alone (p = 0.006); 60.5% (26/43) of patients received bridge-to-transplant MCS; 39.5% (17/43) received bridge-to-recovery MCS; 58.5% (24/41) underwent OHT a median of 104 (58–255) days from diagnosis. GCM recurrence after OHT was reported in 8.3% (2/24) of transplanted cases. BiVAD predominates in mechanically supported patients with GCM. Survival and bridge to recovery appear better in patients on immunosuppression, especially if initiated before MCS.