Mystakelis, Harry

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to characterize susceptibility profiles of both currently approved and investigational β-lactam agents against difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR P. aeruginosa) clinical isolates, including carbapenemase-producing strains. Patients and methods A total of 502 consecutive DTR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were collected from unique hospitalized patients between 2022 and 2024 across three tertiary care centres. Isolates originated from bloodstream, respiratory, urinary and intra-abdominal infections. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for seven β-lactam agents were determined using triplicate reference broth microdilution. Susceptibility interpretations were based on CLSI criteria or, where applicable, investigational breakpoints. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to detect β-lactamase genes. Results Among the 502 isolates, cefepime-zidebactam exhibited the highest in vitro activity (100% susceptibility), followed by cefiderocol-xeruborbactam (98%), cefiderocol (95%), ceftolozane-tazobactam (90%), cefepime-taniborbactam (86%), ceftazidime-avibactam (85%), and imipenem-relebactam (41%). Notably, only 35% of isolates were susceptible to all seven agents. Carbapenemase genes were identified in 4% of isolates, including blaGES (n = 13), blaVIM (n = 7), blaKPC (n = 1) and blaIMP (n = 1). Among carbapenemase-producing isolates, cefepime-zidebactam retained activity against all isolates (100%), exceeding that of other approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (0%–24% susceptible), cefiderocol (76%), cefiderocol-xeruborbactam (86%) and cefepime-taniborbactam (81%). Conclusions While currently approved β-lactam agents retained activity against many DTR P. aeruginosa isolates, their performance was markedly compromised in the presence of carbapenemases, with the notable exceptions of cefepime-zidebactam and cefiderocol. Investigational β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations exhibited consistently robust activity across resistance phenotypes, including carbapenemase-producing isolates, representing promising options for DTR P. aeruginosa infections.

Background: Persistent inflammation and incomplete immune recovery among persons with HIV (PHIV) are associated with increased disease risk. We hypothesized that the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) losartan would reduce inflammation by mitigating nuclear factor (NF)κB responses and promote T-cell recovery via inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ)-mediated fibrosis. Methods: Losartan (100 mg) versus placebo over 12 months was investigated in a randomized (1 : 1) placebo-controlled trial, among PHIV age at least 50 years, receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), with HIV RNA less than 200 copies/ml and CD4+ cell count 600 cells/μl or less. Inflammation, fibrosis and myocardial biomarkers were measured in blood using ELISA, electrochemiluminescence and immunoturbidimetric methods, and T-cell and monocyte phenotypes were assessed with flow cytometry among a subset of participants. Changes over follow-up in (log-2 transformed) biomarkers and cell phenotypes (untransformed) were compared between losartan and placebo arms using linear mixed models. Results: Among 108 PHIV (n = 52 to losartan; n = 56 to placebo), 97% had a month 12 visit. Median age was 57 years and baseline CD4+ cell count was 408 cells/μl. Losartan treatment was not associated with an improvement in interleukin-6 levels, or other blood measures of inflammation, immune activation, fibrosis activity or myocardial function. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells also did not differ by treatment group. Losartan reduced SBP and DBP by 6 and 5 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: Among older PHIV with viral suppression, losartan did not improve blood measures of inflammation nor T-cell immune recovery. Losartan treatment is unlikely to reduce inflammation associated comorbidities to a clinically meaningful degree, beyond the benefits from lowering blood pressure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02049307.