Babski-Reeves, Kari

Assistive equipment has helped lower task demands and back stress for patient-handlers; however, limited research exists on the psychological benefits (i.e., safety and comfort) of self-transfer devices for patients in postoperative care. A study was conducted to determine the efficacy of a bed assistive device in a patient population; the objectives were to compare self-perceived recovery measures and usage of pain medication between patients in the Control ( n = 8; age, 34 ± 6.3years) and Device ( n = 7; 41 ± 12) groups. Fifteen female participants undergoing either abdominal hysterectomy ( n = 6) or Cesareansection ( n = 9) procedures were recruited for the study. Both groups completed a total of twelve questionnaires over a five-week recovery period. The Device Group reported higher levels of energy, less pain interference, lower perceived pain, less reliance on pain medication and returned to activities of daily living faster than the Control Group.

Objective: Muscle activity with and without the use of commercially available patient assistive devices during bed rising and lowering was quantified. Background: Limited research is available in understanding or evaluating the physical benefits of assistive devices for patient use following major abdominal surgery. Methods: Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women) took part in a laboratory study to test the effects of device configuration (five levels) and bed elevation angle (0° and 30°) on mean and peak upper and lower rectus abdominis and external oblique concentric and eccentric muscle activity. Results: Reduced muscle activity was associated with the use of an assistive device, as compared with manual bed rising (unassisted). Positioning the devices at a higher anchor height and/or increasing the bed elevation angle further reduced muscle activity. Objective and subjective differences between the two assistive devices evaluated in the study were found. Conclusion: These results suggest that self-assistive devices may speed recovery because of reduced loads on damaged tissues. Application: Potential applications of this research include the assessment of other commercially available lift aids or comparisons of self-assistive lift aids with hospital-housed lift aids used to speed recovery rates.