Lee, A.T

Abstract Background Guidelines promote shared decision-making (SDM) for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We recently showed that adding a within-encounter SDM tool to usual care (UC) increases patient involvement in decision making and clinician satisfaction, without affecting encounter length. Purpose We aimed to estimate the extent to which use of an SDM tool affected patient adherence to the decided care plan and clinical safety endpoints. Methods We conducted a multi-center, encounter-level randomized trial assessing the efficacy of UC with vs. without an SDM conversation tool for use during the clinical encounter (Anticoagulation Choice, AC) in patients with non-valvular AF considering starting or reviewing anticoagulation treatment. We conducted a chart and pharmacy review, blinded to randomization status, at 10 months post-enrollment to assess primary adherence (proportion of patients who were prescribed an anticoagulant who filled their first prescription) and secondary adherence (estimated using the proportion of days for which treatment was supplied and filled [PDC] for DOAC, and as time in therapeutic range (TTR) for warfarin). We also followed for any safety outcomes (stroke [stroke or transient ischemic attack], major bleeding, or death). Results We enrolled 922 evaluable patient encounters (AC=463, UC=459), of which 814 (88%) had pharmacy and clinical follow-up. We found no differences between arms in either primary (78% of patients in AC filled their first prescription vs. 81% in UC) or secondary adherence to anticoagulation (see Figure, PDCDOAC was 74.1% in AC vs. 71.6% in UC; TTRwarfarin was 66.6% in AC vs. 64.4% in UC). PDCDOAC was better (65%) in AC than in UC (55%) (OR 1.49, CIs 1.00, 2.22). Safety outcomes, mostly bleeds, occurred in 13% (AC) of and 14% (UC) of participants. Conclusions This is the largest reported randomized trial in AF comparing usual care with and without an SDM tool to promote SDM. Although patients were more actively involved in SDM, we found no significant differences between arms in primary or secondary adherence to anticoagulation or clinical safety outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): The trial was funded by and conducted independently of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL131535-01). The funding body had no influence on the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Figure 1

Abstract Background There is a paucity of data about the prevalence and natural history of mitral annular calcification (MAC). Purposes In a large cohort of patients undergoing clinically-indicated echocardiography, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the natural history of MAC, and the frequency of associated mitral valve dysfunction (MVD). Methods Retrospective review of all patients who underwent echocardiographic evaluation at our institution between January 1st and December 31st 2015. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: MAC with MVD, MAC without MVD, no MAC. MVD was defined as moderate or greater mitral regurgitation (MR) or stenosis (MS). The 3 groups were compared for baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Results Of 24,415 evaluated patients, 5478 (22%) had MAC. Patients with MAC were older (75±10 vs. 60±16 years, p<0.01) and more often female (46% vs. 43%, p<0.01). MVD was more frequently observed in patients with MAC (16% vs. 7%, p<0.01); moderate or greater MR was found in 10% of patients with MAC vs. 6% without MAC (p<0.01) and MS in 7% vs. 0.5% (p<0.01). In patients with MAC, those with MVD were more often female and more frequently had creatinine ≥2mg/dl and moderate or greater aortic stenosis (AS) than those without MVD (Fig. A). Kaplan-Meier survivals at 1 year were 75% in patients with MAC and MVD, 87% in those with MAC without MVD, and 92% in those without MAC (Fig B). Adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, creatinine ≥2 mg/dl, coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, and AS, MAC was associated with higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio1.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.3–1.5, p<0.01); combined MAC and MVD was associated with the highest mortality during follow-up of 2.5±1.8 years. Conclusion In a large cohort of patients undergoing echocardiographic evaluation, the prevalence of MAC was 22%. MV dysfunction was more than twice as prevalent in patients with MAC as without. Patients with MAC had higher all-cause mortality than patients without MAC. Among patients with MAC and mitral valvular dysfunction, adjusted mortality was two-fold higher compared to those without MAC. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None