Barry, Frank

ABSTRACTCell‐based therapies, defined here as the delivery of cells in vivo to treat disease, have recently gained increasing public attention as a potentially promising approach to restore structure and function to musculoskeletal tissues. Although cell‐based therapy has the potential to improve the treatment of disorders of the musculoskeletal system, there is also the possibility of misuse and misrepresentation of the efficacy of such treatments. The medical literature contains anecdotal reports and research studies, along with web‐based marketing and patient testimonials supporting cell‐based therapy. Both the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) are committed to ensuring that the potential of cell‐based therapies is realized through rigorous, reproducible, and clinically meaningful scientific discovery. The two organizations convened a multidisciplinary and international Task Force composed of physicians, surgeons, and scientists who are recognized experts in the development and use of cell‐based therapies. The Task Force was charged with defining the state‐of‐the art in cell‐based therapies and identifying the gaps in knowledge and methodologies that should guide the research agenda. The efforts of this Task Force are designed to provide researchers and clinicians with a better understanding of the current state of the science and research needed to advance the study and use of cell‐based therapies for skeletal tissues. The design and implementation of rigorous, thorough protocols will be critical to leveraging these innovative treatments and optimizing clinical and functional patient outcomes. In addition to providing specific recommendations and ethical considerations for preclinical and clinical investigations, this report concludes with an outline to address knowledge gaps in how to determine the cell autonomous and nonautonomous effects of a donor population used for bone regeneration. © 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:485–502, 2020

ABSTRACT Cell-based therapies, defined here as the delivery of cells in vivo to treat disease, have recently gained increasing public attention as a potentially promising approach to restore structure and function to musculoskeletal tissues. Although cell-based therapy has the potential to improve the treatment of disorders of the musculoskeletal system, there is also the possibility of misuse and misrepresentation of the efficacy of such treatments. The medical literature contains anecdotal reports and research studies, along with web-based marketing and patient testimonials supporting cell-based therapy. Both the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) are committed to ensuring that the potential of cell-based therapies is realized through rigorous, reproducible, and clinically meaningful scientific discovery. The two organizations convened a multidisciplinary and international Task Force composed of physicians, surgeons, and scientists who are recognized experts in the development and use of cell-based therapies. The Task Force was charged with defining the state-of-the art in cell-based therapies and identifying the gaps in knowledge and methodologies that should guide the research agenda. The efforts of this Task Force are designed to provide researchers and clinicians with a better understanding of the current state of the science and research needed to advance the study and use of cell-based therapies for skeletal tissues. The design and implementation of rigorous, thorough protocols will be critical to leveraging these innovative treatments and optimizing clinical and functional patient outcomes. In addition to providing specific recommendations and ethical considerations for preclinical and clinical investigations, this report concludes with an outline to address knowledge gaps in how to determine the cell autonomous and nonautonomous effects of a donor population used for bone regeneration. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Abstract Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) have the ability to migrate specifically to tumours in vivo, and coupled with their capacity to bypass immune surveillance, are potentially attractive vehicles for tumor-targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. The aim of this study was to determine the potential of MSC-mediated expression of the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) for in vivo imaging and therapy of breast tumours. Expression of NIS allows cells to concentrate radionuclides including technetium-99m (Tc-99m) and 131-Iodine (131-I). This could potentially support imaging of NIS-expressing MSCs following engraftment, and 131-I therapy of surrounding tumour tissue based on the bystander effect of the radionuclide. Methods: Tumor bearing animals (MDA-MB-231 flank) were given an intravenous or intratumoral injection of NIS expressing human MSCs (MSC-NIS), followed by imaging 3, 7, 10 or 14 days later. Imaging was performed using a Bazooka SPECT γ-camera, following intraperitoneal injection of 2mCi/74MBq Tc-99m. Following imaging, animals were sacrificed and organs harvested for analysis of hNIS expression by RQ-PCR. A second group of animals received an intraperitoneal injection of 1mCi/37MBq 131-I or saline (controls) 14 days following intratumoral or intravenous injection of MSC-NIS, and tumour volume was tracked for 8 weeks. Results: Bazooka SPECT imaging of animals revealed uptake of tracer (Tc-99m) in the mouse thyroid/salivary glands and stomach, representing native NIS expression. Following injection of MSC-NIS, an image of animal intestines was also observed at D3, with a weak image of the tumour also visible. By Day14, uptake of tracer was visible at the site of the tumour with no significant image of non-target tissue observed. Expression of hNIS in harvested organs supported the imaging data, with hNIS detected in the intestines, heart, lungs and tumour at early timepoints. While NIS expression depleted in non-target tissues by D7, gene expression persisted at the tumour site. Based on imaging/biodistribution data, animals were given a therapeutic dose of 131-I 14 days following MSC-NIS injection to avoid toxicity to non-target organs. No adverse effect of injection of MSC-NIS or radionuclide was observed. Tracking of tumour volume revealed a significant reduction in tumour growth in animals that had received an intravenous injection of 131-I 14days following MSC-NIS injection (Mean ± SEM, 236 ± 62mm3 versus 665 ± 204 mm3 in controls). Following intratumoral injection of MSC-NIS + 131-I, although tumour size was reduced compared to controls (472 ± 80 mm3), the difference in volume was not significant. Conclusion: The ability to non-invasively track MSC migration and transgene expression in real time prior to therapy is a major advantage to this strategy. This promising data supports the viability of this approach as a novel therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5392. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5392

Background. A major technical limitation in preclinical cell replacement research is the ability to discriminate between donor and host tissue after transplantation. This problem has been lessened by the availability of transgenic animals that express “reporter” genes, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP). Objective. We determined the usefulness of one such transgenic reporter rat to assess the survival of bone marrow—derived rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) following direct transplantation into the intact adult brain. We also sought to determine if the expression of GFP in the brain affected the survival of the MSCs or the host’s neuroimmune response to the cells. Methods. Rats received intrastriatal injections of sterile transplantation medium, 100 000 normal MSCs, or 100 000 GFP-MSCs and were killed humanely 1, 4, 7, 28, and 42 days posttransplantation for astrocyte and microglial immunohistochemical staining. Results. GFP-MSCs were evident at each examination, although their survival declined over time. Graft volume estimates comparing normal and GFP-MSCs revealed that GFP expression did not adversely affect the survival of the stem cells in the brain. Furthermore, immunostaining for astrocytes and microglia revealed that expression of the reporter protein did not affect the immunogenicity of the stem cells. Conclusions. These data indicate the usefulness of GFP for investigating the survival of MSCs following transplantation to the brain. However, the mechanisms responsible for the poor survival of the stem cells must be elucidated if these cells are to serve cell-based therapies for neurodegenerative disorders.

The aims of this research were to examine the neural expression profile of undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), to define a serum-free environment that would support the survival of MSCs, and to assess the effects of elevated cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels on MSC morphology and expression of neural markers. The neural profile of MSCs was assessed using immunocytochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. These MSCs were then cultured in varying serum-free environments, with flow cytometry analysis of cell viability and apoptosis. The effects of forskolin and 8 bromo-cAMP treatment on MSC morphology and expression of neural markers were assessed using light microscopy, immunocytochemistry and real-time PCR analysis. Expression of the neural markers nestin, vimentin, β III tubulin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and the tropomyosin-related kinases was demonstrated in normal undifferentiated MSCs. Furthermore, MSCs cultured in serum-free conditions containing ascorbic acid 2-phosphate demonstrated greater long-term survival and reduced apoptosis. In contrast, forskolin increased the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis. Culture in the presence of forskolin induced a 6-fold increase in β III tubulin expression after a 6-h exposure time, which was accompanied by dramatic changes in morphology. However, this effect was transient, with the cells reverting to their normal morphology by 24 h. Treatment with 8 bromo-cAMP induced similar increases in β III tubulin expression without such dramatic morphological changes. Factors which increase the concentration of cAMP induce transient changes in expression of neural markers that appear to be the result of cellular adaptation to changes in culture conditions rather than a real process of neural differentiation.