Giglio, Pierre

Abstract Background:The standard of care for elderly glioblastoma (GBM) patients is 40 Gy in 15 fraction radiotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). However, this regimen has a lower biologic equivalent dose (BED) compared to the Stupp regimen of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. We hypothesize that accelerated hypofractionated radiation of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions (BED equivalent to Stupp) will have superior survival compared to 40 Gy in 15 fractions.Methods:Elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) who received hypofractionated radiation with TMZ from 2010-2020 were included in this analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were defined as the time elapsed between surgery/biopsy and death from any cause or progression. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients who received 40 Gy and 52.5 Gy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.Results: Sixty-six newly diagnosed patients were eligible for analysis. Thirty-nine patients were treated with 40 Gy in 15 fractions while twenty-seven were treated with 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions. Patients had no significant differences in age, sex, methylation status, or performance status. Overall survival (OS) was superior in the 52.5 Gy group (14.1 months) when compared to the 40 Gy group (7.9 months, p = 0.011). Isoeffective dosing to 52.5 Gy was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for improved OS on multivariable analysis. Conclusions:Isoeffective dosing to 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions was associated with superior OS compared to standard of care 40 Gy in 15 fractions. These hypothesis generating data support accelerated hypofractionation in future prospective trials.

Abstract Background The current standard of care for the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). While it is well established that TMZ has better efficacy in patients with MGMT promoter methylation, it remains an area of debate whether TMZ should be omitted when treating GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide separate estimates of median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with methylated and unmethylated GBM treated with RT with or without TMZ. We searched multiple databases from inception to January 13, 2020. Results The median OS for patients with unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ pooled from 5 phase III studies (N = 655) was 14.11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.18–15.04) with a median PFS of 4.99 months (95% CI, 4.25–5.72). In contrast, the median OS for patients with methylated GBM pooled from 6 studies (N = 753) was 24.59 months (95% CI, 22.19–26.99) with a median PFS pooled from 7 studies (N = 805) of 9.51 months (95% CI, 7.41–11.61). There is a paucity of prospective data pertaining to OS/PFS in unmethylated patients treated with RT only and therefore a direct comparison was not possible. Conclusions This meta-analysis provides estimates of survival for patients with MGMT methylated or unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ. Further research is needed to delineate whether TMZ should be withheld for patients with unmethylated GBM outside of the setting of clinical trials.